Bush to vote for Clinton? The establishment has no political party

September 22, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

If there’s one thing we have learned from this election season it’s that the establishment will protect its own, regardless of the political parties associated. This was proven when the Republicans and Democrats actively tried to prevent the success of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders and again when they tried to prevent Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson from being allowed at the presidential debates.

This became even clearer recently, when it was revealed that George H.W. Bush was planning on voting for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. A member of one establishment political family supporting another member of an establishment political family? There’s no surprise there…

Kathleen Hartington Kennedy — the daughter of Robert F. Kennedy — revealed in a Facebook post that Bush recently told her that he was planning to vote for Clinton, because of course he is. The globalist elite cannot allow an outsider to hold such a position of power in the United States. It would surely send their entire plan into a tailspin, as it would likely give the enslaved American people the freedoms people like Clinton are so desperately trying to take away.

When asked about the post, Bush’s spokesman Jim McGrath stated, “The vote President Bush will cast as a private citizen in some 50 days will be just that: a private vote cast in some 50 days. He is not commenting on the presidential race in the interim.” Apparently he knows the kind of backlash he will receive for supporting a crooked criminal like Hillary Clinton will be far too much to handle.

This election may be the most important one of our entire lifetime. It’s not an exaggeration to say that this is a life or death situation for many Americans. We have an opportunity to change the way American citizens are treated by sending a message to the establishment. If we let them know that we are unhappy with the current state of affairs in the United States — and rally the equally unsatisfied masses — then we can change things.

The powers that be are never going to have a change of heart. They are going to continue to do whatever they can to expand their power and keep the rest of us trapped under their tyrannical control. These fascists do not care about us. They only care about themselves and their money. It’s time for us to follow suit.

It’s time for us to learn to take care of ourselves and put our future into our own hands instead of relying on those who clearly do not want us to succeed.

Sources:

Politico.com

Fortune.com

Clinton Foundation making money by renting stolen land to Federal Bureau of Land Management

September 16, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

Despite all of the corruption surrounding the organization, you can’t help but laugh at all of the news surrounding the Clinton Family Foundation. Having been wrapped up in countless scandals over the years, it almost appears as though the organization was founded for the sole purpose of making the Clinton family look like maniacal thieves with no respect for anyone but themselves.

A quick Google search will lead you to all sorts of information about how Hillary and Bill have essentially been using the organization for the singular purpose of laundering money. Having accepted donations from world leaders who would just so happen to benefit from having close relationships with the Clinton family, there’s little doubt that corruption is afoot in the organization.

These kinds of revelations seem to be brought to light every week or so now. There’s so much shadiness going on within the group that new evidence proving its corruption is no longer surprising.

Take, for instance, the fact that it has recently been unveiled that the Clinton Foundation has some pretty unflattering connections with Russia, of all places.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has been seizing land with the goal of leasing it to high-level donors of the Clinton Foundation. Considering that Hillary has utilized similar tactics in order to receive millions of dollars from Saudi Arabian leaders, there’s not much of a surprise there, despite being quite disgusting and un-American.

And it all comes down to the control of uranium — and the financial gain that comes with it. Red Flag News reports that “Russia gradually gained control of Uranium One, a major mining company, in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State.”

Because of this, Vladimir Putin now controls roughly 20% of uranium that is produced in the United States. Hillary Clinton is at fault for this. For a woman whose presidential campaign has been filled with anti-Russian rhetoric about how Donald Trump and Putin are too friendly with each other, it’s hilarious to discover that Hillary has essentially been in business with the man. What’s not so funny is that the American economy is suffering pretty heavily because of this strange partnership.

Once again, the hypocritical democrats have found a way to destroy the lives of the American people under the guise that they’re fighting for freedom and the safety of the country at large. This is just par for the course these days, but it’s still completely disheartening to know that nothing seems to be changing, despite our lack of satisfaction with the way things are.

It cannot be overstated: Hillary Clinton is unfit to be elected president. From her numerous scandals to her poor health, there’s no denying that she doesn’t have the ability to properly run a country. She’s an absolute mess of a person that values her own checkbook over the wellbeing of the country she claims to love.

Like most of the politicians holding office in the federal government, Hillary Clinton is morally bankrupt, which explains why her bank account is so heavy. She has been selling out the American people to improve the quality of her own life, and it’s time that we send the message that we’re not going to let her do this any longer.

It’s time to be done with Hillary Clinton.

Sources:

RedFlagNews.com

NYTimes.com

Hillary avoided ER to hide information about her health from being leaked

September 15, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

One of the most talked about issues concerning the 2016 presidential election has become Hillary Clinton’s seemingly poor health, which has appeared to grow increasingly terrible over the past few weeks. While many alternative media outlets have been reporting on her apparent sickness for years now, visual evidence is finally being brought to light thanks to increased press coverage on the presidential hopeful.

As a result, the Clinton campaign has been going out of their way to assure voters that Hillary is in perfectly good health. Of course, they’ve also claimed that she had an allergic reaction, pneumonia and was overheated all at once, but they continue to assure the easily manipulated voters on the Regressive Left that Hillary Clinton will live forever.

Anyone with a brain and working eyeballs can see that Hillary Clinton is not in the best of health. Whether or not she is on the verge of death has yet to be proven, but people that are in top form simply do not have daily coughing fits on pass out so frequently that they need constant handlers to make sure they stay upright. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure out that something just isn’t right here.

Now it has been revealed that there’s even more to the story than initially believed.

Shortly after collapsing at the September 11th memorial ceremony, Hillary Clinton was rushed to the emergency room — but her campaign prevented that from happening and instead took Hillary to her daughter, Chelsea’s home. Why would they do such a thing? Why wouldn’t they take the precaution to ensure that Hillary was truly safe? Given that she has appeared in visibly poor condition as of late, it’s shocking that anyone would choose not to take her to get checked out by a professional.

The only logical explanation here is that those close to Hillary know exactly what is wrong with her and are doing everything in their power to prevent news from breaking to the public. They’re going as far as to keep her out of hospitals so that not even doctors can leak information to the American people.

From that information, one can infer that Hillary Clinton has more serious ailments than just bad allergies or a bout with pneumonia. It seems as though the alternative media was right all along when they reported that Hillary is battling some form of serious disease.

Whether it be Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s, whatever is wrong with Hillary very likely makes her unfit to hold the most important position in the country. Whoever is holding that office needs to have an incredible level of mental and physical health — and Hillary seems to be the furthest from that.

Sources:

NYPost.com

DailyMail.co.uk

Clinton camp threatening a ‘free press’ for daring to cover her health issues

September 14, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

Pay attention, America: Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has surrounded herself with sycophantic drones who don’t believe in freedom of the press, a basic protection found in the Constitution’s very First Amendment, when it comes to covering their candidate.

In recent days, upset that anyone in the press or in the general public would dare question why Clinton is having some obvious medical issues, some of Hillary’s campaign staff have warned the media to get off the story, ostensibly because there is nothing wrong with her.

As noted by The Hill, Clinton campaign manager Nick Merrill took a reporter for NBC to task for writing about her most recent coughing fit – one of the worst of this campaign cycle, at least of those seen in public – telling him he should “get a life.”

Jon Favreau, a former speechwriter for President Obama, asked on Twitter if “anyone on NBC, or anywhere else” wanted to defend the report.

The short story, written by Andrew Rafferty, was headlined, “Hillary Clinton fights back coughing attack” – hardly an embellishment and, given the severity of the attack, pretty mild actually. In the story Rafferty reported that the “frog in Clinton’s throat…was one of the most aggressive she’s had during her 2016 run.”

If you’ve seen the coughing fit – which is here – there is no doubt that Rafferty’s description and characterization of the incident is spot-on accurate. And for Pete’s sake, it is news. This woman is running for president of the United States, and she can’t seem to walk up a short flight of stairs without help or talk in public without coughing her head off.

Allergies, as she alluded to during the most recent fit, which was during a Labor Day campaign speech in Cleveland, are not the reason why Clinton can’t stop coughing. If that were the case, as long as she’s been in the public eye, Americans would have been watching this for decades. These fits are recent, and they are coming after she suffered a major head injury and brain blood clot stemming from a fall in 2012. By her husband Bill’s own admission, it took her half a year to get over and it wasn’t easy, either.

So, from this media outlet to the Clinton campaign: Your candidate’s health is an issue and ought to be aggressively covered. And we will. In fact, we believe that your attempt to shame the mainstream media into getting off the story – perhaps by threatening to cut off access to your candidate or something – is telegraphing that you know she’s not healthy.

And there is this. If these coughing fits, inability to climb stairs and other physical issues including
needing to use an ear bud to receive instructions during a recent Q & A on national security were happening to GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump, the press – and the Clinton campaign – would be all over it.

Sources:

Preparation? Two mainstream news reports claimed that Hillary Clinton died

September 14, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

When many alternative media outlets began making claims that Hillary Clinton was in poor health, people were justifiably unconvinced. After all, the reports seemed as if they were reaching at best and downright delusional at worst. As is often the case when it comes to the political sphere, it seemed more like wishful thinking than actual, honest reporting.

Over the past few weeks, though, those alternative media outlets seem to have been proven correct in their reporting.

Photographic and video evidence of Hillary Clinton coughing, stumbling, tripping and fainting have all but proven that the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee is suffering from some form of serious physical illness. People have speculated that she has contracted everything from Alzheimer’s to Parkinson’s and is suffering from the disease in a deathly state.

While there is yet to be hard proof as to what exactly is happening, there’s no denying that something is seriously wrong with Hillary Clinton’s health. No matter what the liberal media will try to convince you, there’s nothing normal about having unstoppable coughing fits or passing out on the sidewalk. These are symptoms of some kind of sickness — there’s no denying that anymore.

Many have even reported that Clinton may be on the verge of death. Considering how ill she has looked as of late, it wouldn’t be especially surprising if her dying were on the horizon, but nothing had been confirmed by anyone close to her.

Well, nothing had been confirmed until two separate branches of ABC News — one national and the other local — preemptively announced that Hillary Clinton had passed away before immediately changing their tune. Shortly after the reports aired, the network corrected their reporters, claiming that they misspoke.

A number of conspiracy theories followed, leaving many to wonder if the woman we’ve known as Hillary Clinton for the past fifteen years actually is who she claims to be. According to The Daily Sheeple, “Something is definitely going on, and a lot of people are asking, did Hillary actually die on 9/11 and what’s happening now is a psyop being perpetrated against the American people? Ground Zero would be a perfect location for it…”

Of course, this belief will be almost immediately discredited as insane, unfounded and evil, but given how bizarre virtually everything about this election cycle has been, would an imposter posing as Hillary be all that surprising?

Still, the most likely outcome is that the liberal media outlets — who clearly have close relationships with the Democratic Party — know that Hillary Clinton is on the verge of death. In turn, they’ve been preparing for what they believe to be her inevitable passing for some time now. It just so happened that they jumped the gun in their initial reporting. Whether or not even this is correct remains to be seen, but there’s definitely more to this story than we’ve been lead to believe…

If there’s one thing we’ve learned about the media over the past five or so years, it’s that the alternative publications tend to expose the truth months before mainstream media sources pick up on it. Could Hillary Clinton’s life-threatening illness be yet another case of this?

Sources:

TheDailySheeple.com

RedState.com

Google partnering with ProPublica to skewer election coverage in favor of Hillary Clinton

September 13, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

If you weren’t aware of ProPublica, it is an investigative media operation that describes itself as an independent organization that believes in “Journalism in the Public Interest.”

Fair enough, but the organization recently entered into an election coverage arrangement with none other than Google, putting its self-described independence in question.

As noted here, the joint project is between ProPublica and Google NewsLab. Called, “Election DataBot,” the site describes itself as a one-stop shop for political news stories.

“There are a thousand stories in every political campaign. Use this to find them,” says the site.

Under a heading titled, “The Firehose,” visitors are informed that stories and other campaign information are updated in real time and then searchable.

Another section, “Electionland,” found here, allows journalists covering voting to sign up “to find out more about how you can get tips about voting problems in your area.” Voters can also sign up to “be involved” with the project.

Sounds simple enough and on the up-and-up, right? There’s just one problem. Nothing having to do with Google News and media is independent and unbiased. Let’s look at the evidence.

First, Google’s executive chairman, Eric Schmidt, says he’s backing Democrat Hillary Clinton.

Clinton herself hired a longtime Google executive, Stephanie Hannon, in April 2015 to oversee her campaign’s technology development and outreach.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange revealed in December 2014 that if she ran, multiple Google executives would back her, apparently regardless of who the Republican candidate was eventually going to be.

“It should be noted that the ties [of Google] with Hillary Clinton are especially strong,” Assange said. “Many of those employed by Google have previously worked as her advisers or assistants.”

Google execs conspired with Clinton in 2012, when she was still secretary of state, to work with Syrian rebels who sought to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad.

Then there is Google News’ extremely slanted aggregate coverage of news having to do with Clinton. As noted by Breitbart News, the search engine portion of Google’s operations were caught skewing – as in, covering up – results to her advantage.

That came after a Breitbart News report earlier that noted that Google was directly involved with her campaign.

ProPublica claims to be an independent news organization interested only in presenting unbiased facts to the general public. It should be obvious by this election coverage partnership with Google that the organization has no intention of remaining neutral.

Sources:

Clinton Foundation caught selling diplomatic passports to donors

September 13, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

When Hillary Clinton announced her decision to run for president in the 2016 election, many politically-minded folks began to analyze her past behavior in order to determine whether or not they believed her to be a competent and respectable commander-in-chief.

As you probably already expected, the results were not in her favor. At all.

While many controversies like the Benghazi attack and her visibly dwindling health were mistakes and immoral choices that Hillary made on her own accord, an overwhelming majority of her scandals seemed to stem from her work with the Clinton Family Foundation, which now appears like a huge money laundering scheme instead of a selfless charity. And almost all of the donors were looking for some sort of trade-off.

Hillary’s favorite aide, Huma Abedin, has been involved in her fair share of controversies as well. From her apparent political marriage to sexting addict Anthony Weiner to her connection to radical Islamic extremist groups, Abedin fits right in with the Clinton clan, which is almost never a good thing.

As revealed by the recent DNC email hacks, donors to the Clinton Family Foundation had been sending Abedin emails regarding receiving diplomatic passports as a result of their commitment to the Clinton cult. So by writing a fat paycheck to Hillary Clinton, you can receive political benefits. That is absolutely terrifying and disgusting.

Given Clinton’s close relationship with Saudi Arabia — a country whose primary values and beliefs immensely differ from America’s — it’s particularly worrisome that the leaders of that country can potentially sway Clinton’s opinion on major issues by sending her a few million dollars. This is a country that treats women and members of the LGBT community like second-class citizens. They do not believe in freedom or liberty. Bringing their warped ideology to America, in any way, is a recipe for disaster.

These actions alone are enough to compeltely disqualify Hillary Clinton from being the next president of the United States. By accepting these bribes, she’s proven that she can be bought. As the leader of the free world, that’s the last thing that we want.

We need a strong leader that would laugh in the faces of those who try to bribe them and tell them to beat it. We need a leader that will work hard to make our country safe and prosperous again — not just for rich politicians like Hillary, but also for the average, working class American.

Our country needs a desperate return to form before we reach the point of no return, which seems closer and closer with every passing day. News like this just confirms the fact that American politics has gotten so shady and corrupt that the only way to fix it is by looking at the anti-establishment candidates that are running this fall.

It’s up to us to make a change in this country — and the simplest way to do that is with your votes.

Sources:

Breitbart.com

JudicialWatch.com

NY Times ‘warned’ Clinton to delete her emails

September 13, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

On the surface it looked as if The New York Times was doing its journalistic duty when it first reported that then-Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton had used a private email server to conduct official business as secretary of state. Turns out that the paper may have been warning her to cover her tracks, instead.

As reported by The Hill, scores of Clinton’s emails were deleted after the Times published its story March 2, according to notes from the FBI’s investigation into her private server use that were released last week.

While The Hill attempted to portray the deletion as a “mistake,” a reasonable person reading the passage would conclude that the deletion was more likely done on purpose. The FBI note reads as follows:

In a follow-up FBI interview on May 3, 2016, —— Indicated he believed he had an ‘oh s–t’ moment and sometime between March 25-31, 2015 deleted the Clinton archive mailbox from PRN server and used BleachBit to delete the exported .PST files he had created on the server system containing Clinton;s e-mails. [sic]

Given the gravity of, and implications for Clinton contained in the Times report, along with the fact that all of Clinton’s emails are supposed to be a matter of public record, having such “moments” because you “mistakenly” deleted those records is totally implausible. You have them as a result of being involved in your boss’ scheme to hide her communications from being revealed in a newspaper.

And speaking of the Times report, given the paper’s historical editorial tilt in favor of Clinton and the Democrats in general, was it truly written in the spirit of keeping a watchful eye on those in power, as the founders envisioned a free press would do?

Was it just a momentary lapse of the Times’ usual ideological defense of Clinton – a one-off story to give the paper the appearance of being unbiased?

Or was it written as a warning to her campaign that they needed to do some technological housekeeping before the campaign ramped up in earnest?

Whatever it was, the Times story prompted Clinton allies to begin vacuuming her email files (the “oh s—t” moment), even to the point of using a program – Bleachbit – to “prevent recovery” of electronic files. So effective at cleaning hard drives of data is Bleachbit, that Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C. remarked that “even God can’t read them.”

The story also gave the Clinton campaign a heads-up, allowing aides and likely the candidate herself to decide which of her emails she would eventually make public (though during its investigation the FBI found she had violated the Federal Records Act).

If all this sounds like some wild conspiracy theory, consider this: In the end, FBI Director James Comey himself said he did not believe any “reasonable prosecutor” at the Justice Department would indict her, ostensibly because of a lack of evidence.

Sources:

Wikileaks founder confirms Bernie Sanders was threatened to get out of election

September 13, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange recently confirmed in an interview with Australian journalist John Pilger that Bernie Sanders was, in fact, threatened by members of the Clinton campaign to drop out of the race.

While Assange and WikiLeaks have yet to release the exact email exposing this, they have yet to be proven as anything but trustworthy. What Assange has told all of us about the DNC’s corruption — thanks to WikiLeaks having hacked into their email server — has been the undeniable truth thus far. So when Assange tells us that Bernie Sanders was threatened, the smart money is that he’s being honest with us.

It’s not difficult to understand why the Clinton campaign felt like threatening Sanders was necessary. Clinton was initially seen as a shoo-in as the candidate for Democratic Party, but after the unlikely Bernie Sanders began capturing the affection of liberal millennials across the country, the campaign began to get a lot less cocky.

Of course, Crooked Hillary eventually came out on top, with Sanders eventually dropping out of the race in order for Clinton to enter the frontline. But why he dropped out has been the source of controversy ever since.

If Sanders was threatened, that means that the potential next president of the United States is willing to threaten innocent people in order to get what she wants. Given that her ideals seem to differ drastically from the average American person, this is absolutely horrifying and dangerous for a multitude of reasons.

The Clinton administration’s corruption runs deep. Since Bill first entered the White House decades ago, there has been a hilarious amount of controversy surrounding the family. After Hillary joined the political game, things have grown even more corrupt and unjust. Between the Clinton body count to the Benghazi situation and the aforementioned email scandal, any logical person can see that she is a legitimate problem for the well being of our country.

As free Americans, we need to loudly voice our concerns that Hillary has the potential to destroy all of us. If she is willing to threatened a member of her own party because he was becoming more popular than her, then what is she willing to do to those of us that directly oppose her rise to power?

With her in charge, all of us are in trouble. It may sound like an overreaction or a ridiculous attempt to smear Hillary, but it just isn’t anymore. Hillary has been proven to be a corrupt individual who cares more about financial gain than the well being of her country’s citizens. That isn’t going to change and we have a duty to stand up against it.

Sources:

Press24.us

MorningNewsUSA.com

Hillary fed answers via earpiece to media questions

September 9, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

It’s actually kind of a sad situation. No matter how hard Hillary Clinton tries not to appear to be a completely untrustworthy, slimy dunce, she has never been able to break out of that shell. No matter what, she always finds a way to absolutely blow it, en route to appearing less and less fit to be the next president of the United States.

Since she first got into politics, many have posed the theory that Bill Clinton has been pulling the strings, treating her like a puppet who simply regurgitates his ideals in a much more annoying voice. Now, decades later, we have received hard proof that nothing Hillary is saying has been her own thoughts.

Recently, legendary actor and conservative James Woods tweeted an image of Hillary Clinton at the presidential forum with an obvious earpiece lodged in her ear. Given its clear texture and small size, it’s apparent that this was never meant to be seen, but thanks to the advancement of technology, such an act didn’t go unnoticed.

Earpiece? #CrookedHillary pic.twitter.com/6LqxRGTgA5

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 8, 2016

Paul Joseph Watson of Infowars reports, “This is not the first time Clinton has faced charges that she was wearing an earpiece during a crucial event – similar claims were made after her appearance in front of the House Select Benghazi Hearing in October last year.”

As always seems to be the case with the Clinton family, the evidence continues to pile up in regards to finding proof that she is incredibly shady and untrustworthy. If she is genuine, honest and speaking from the heart — like all politicians should be — then why does she need someone to feed her answers to simple questions that merely require honesty and intelligence?

How can we, as a society, pretend that this isn’t a serious issue?

It’s not like we need more reasons not to support her, though. From the Benghazi coverup to the email scandal and her visibly deteriorating health issues, Clinton is unfit to be president — and we’re all in serious trouble if she somehow ends up taking office. It’s deeply upsetting that she somehow managed to get this far in her political career (though it’s no surprise when you consider that many of her detractors end up in body bags), but it has happened and now we must deal with the problem.

As scary as it may be to admit, given the importance of the situation, this is our responsibility, folks. If Hillary is elected, that blood is on our hands. We cannot sit around while this corrupt, lying criminal becomes the leader of the free world. Send a message with your votes this fall.

Sources:

Infowars.com

DailyMail.co.uk