ArchiveArchive

Former Clinton Foundation CEO missing since October 2016 – #WheresEric internet chatter reaches a fevered pitch

January 5, 2017 by News Editors Leave a Comment

Former Clinton Foundation CEO, Eric Braverman, was hired in July 2013, supposedly backed by Chelsea Clinton to “impose McKinsey-like management rigor,” to the foundation. The foundation board approved a $395,000 salary, plus bonuses, then voted to extend his term through 2017. Weeks after that vote to extend his board term, Braverman abruptly quit in January 2015.

(Article by Sudan Duclos, republished from allnewspipeline.com)

According to a Politico article about Braverman from March 2015, “his exit stemmed partly from a power struggle inside the foundation between and among the coterie of Clinton loyalists who have surrounded the former president for decades and who helped start and run the foundation.”

Six days after that Politico story was published and about two months after Braverman resigned, Joe Scarborough, host of Morning Joe on MSNBC, tweeted “A source close to the Clintons tell @ron_fournier to “follow the money” and find the real HRC scandal.”

According to leaked emails published by Wikileaks from the Podesta emails, Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden emailed Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta “@JoeNBC: A source close to the Clintons tell @ron_fournier to “follow the money” and find the real HRC scandal. http://t.co/lPTQY0L0o4 – I’m hoping someone is keeping tabs on Doug Band. Quote in here is from someone who worked in Clinton Foundation.”

Podesta responded with one name “Eric Braverman.” To which Tanden replied “Holy Moses.”

That same month is when the news of Clinton’s private email server broke nationally, became major headline news.

Wikileaks published those emails during the height of the election season, in October 2016, around the same time that Eric Braverman disappeared from public view. His last public activity can be traced to an October 12, 2016 retweet. A look at his Twitter history shows he was wasn’t very active, as the one before that was on August 3rd and before that, one in June.

Is it a coincidence that Braverman cannot be contacted in any manner, from emails sent to him and to Yale University, where he is still listed for Spring 2017 classes in the School of Management and the law school, all not responded to?

Rachel Alexander from Stream, writes the following: “I left a voicemail on Braverman’s personal phone and sent him an email, but received no response. He is still listed as a lecturer at Yale University and, contrary to some reports, there is a record of his lectures going back several years. I contacted the press office and Braverman’s department at Yale and received no response.”

ANP has also attempted to reach out to Braverman as well as contacts connected to him, to no avail.

Videographer George Webb, who runs a popular YouTube channel has been tracking Braverman’s disappearance, providing daily feature video updates, and believes Braverman officially went missing 12 days after his last tweet, on October 24, 2016, which was just two days after Wikileaks published the Podesta email where it became public knowledge that Podesta suspected Braverman of being behind the “follow the money and find the real HRC scandal,” scoop given to Ron Fournier.”

Internet chatter and conspiracy theories have surrounded Braverman’s disappearance from the public, originating with a rumor that he had sought asylum from Russia, but due to his intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton Foundation, in conjunction with the fact that five FBI bureaus across the country, in New York, Little Rock, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and Miami , are all involved in a massive probe of the Clinton Foundation, it is more likely that Braverman is in protective custody as witness to the crimes he uncovered during his tenure at the Clinton Foundation, since no official missing persons report has been filed on him.

In November 2016, Brett Bauer from Fox News reporters that FBI sources believed the Clinton Foundation case was moving towards “likely an indictment.”

Transcript via Real Clear Politics:

BRET BAIER: Breaking news tonight — two separate sources with intimate knowledge of the FBI investigations into the Clinton emails and the Clinton Foundation tell Fox the following:

The investigation looking into possible pay-for-play interaction between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Foundation has been going on for more than a year. Led by the white collar crime division, public corruption branch of the criminal investigative division of the FBI.

The Clinton Foundation investigation is a, quote, “very high priority.” Agents have interviewed and reinterviewed multiple people about the Foundation case, and even before the WikiLeaks dumps, agents say they have collected a great deal of evidence. Pressed on that, one sources said, quote, “a lot of it,” and “there is an avalanche of new information coming every day.”

Some of it from WikiLeaks, some of it from new emails. The agents are actively and aggressively pursuing this case. They will be going back to interview the same people again, some for the third time.

As a result of the limited immunity deals to top aides, including Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, the Justice Department had tentatively agreed that the FBI would destroy those laptops after a narrow review. We are told definitively that has not happened. Those devices are currently in the FBI field office here in Washington, D.C. and are being exploited.

The source points out that any immunity deal is null and void if any subject lied at any point in the investigation.

Another interesting point that we would remiss to ignore is how it became public knowledge that immunity deals had been offered to Clinton aides, regarding the investigations, not one peep from the FBI, nor the mainstream media, has mentioned any such “deal” for Braverman, a man who held the CEO position for the Foundation for over a year, and would be far more knowledgeable about any crimes committed by the Clinton Foundation.

#WheresEric has now been created as a hashtag on Twitter and depending on whether we go from the October 12 retweet by Braverman or the videographer’s date of October 24th, he has now been missing anywhere from 70 to 82 days.

BOTTOM LINE

It all comes back to the “follow the money to find the real HRC scandal,” because the private server use, the internal corruption and collusion by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, and the mainstream media, makes for good headlines, but when you follow the money, all roads lead back to the Clinton Foundation, under investigations by multiple FBI bureaus, and the man that has been missing for well over two months was in a position to know all of their dirty secrets.

Since the initial questions about Braverman’s disappearance from the public eye started months ago, all it would take is one public statement, one returned email, one video, for Braverman to dispel all theories, rumors and talk of his disappearance, yet not one word has come from him or anyone that knows him. No public statements saying he is alive and well. ….. nothing.

The silence is deafening, and troublesome.

Media silence after ‘pay to play’ scheme revealed in Clinton Foundation hack

October 6, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

If you’re reading this, you are someone who has learned long ago not to rely on the so-called “mainstream” establishment media for your news. Those outlets lie, obfuscate and generally shill for one political party and ideology – the Democratic Party.

And because you’re reading this, you’re set to learn more about the Clinton’s malfeasance and corruption via their family “foundation.”

Zero Hedge reports that, after notorious hacker Guccifer 2.0 breached the servers of the Democratic National Committee and the campaign of Hillary Clinton, a hack of the Clinton Foundation had finally taken place, as if we didn’t know that was coming.

“So, this is the moment. I hacked the Clinton Foundation server and downloaded hundreds of thousands of docs and donors’ databases,” the hacker wrote on his website.

The hacked information shows that big banks and corporations agreed to donate to congressional Democrats in exchange for taxpayer-supplied TARP funding.

But the most damning evidence of all is a root directory of folders that Guccifer 2.0 listed on his site – including one folder marked “Pay to Play.”

Now, two factors could be at work here: Either this “pay to play” folder is real and the person who titled it is arrogant (or stupid) enough to believe it will never see the light of day; or the hacked files aren’t real. Indeed, Donna Shalala, a former official in Bill Clinton’s White House and currently president of the foundation, says no hack of the charity’s data has occurred.

But given that Shalala would say that, what’s even more damning here is that the establishment media once again passed on a story that could damage their self-anointed presidential choice – Hillary.

Then again, we’ve come to expect this from the establishment media types. If Hillary is implicated in anything negative or bad, the story gets a pass and is left to the independent alternative media, like us, to report.

One establishment outlet, The Hill, did a brief summary report on the alleged hack, probably because it is a political issue and the publication focuses on Washington politics. But even here the publication attempted to downplay the alleged hack’s significance.

For instance, The Hill noted, “a number of red flags” include the suggestion that the documents posted on the Guccifer 2.0 website came from a previous hack on the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), rather than a new hack of the foundation. Then again, a “spot check” on some of those on a donor list that Guccifer 2.0 posted against Federal Election Commission filings “found that they all lined up with DCCC contributions.”

The political news site also claimed that the Clinton Foundation disclosed its donors – many of which were on the list published by Guccifer 2.0- and that many of them did not give to the organization.

And while The Hill stated this matter-of-factly, in reality the foundation has attempted to hide 1,100 donors.

Sources:

ZeroHedge.com

TheHill.com

Bloomberg.com

Clinton Foundation caught trying to bribe the Senate president of Haiti

September 23, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

The criminal enterprise better known as a “family charity” begun by Bill and Hillary Clinton just got outed again, but given the sea of corruption tied to the Clinton Foundation (and the mainstream media’s lack of interest in reporting Clinton crimes) it’s a good bet most Americans didn’t notice.

As picked up by Zero Hedge, the former Haitian Senate president, Bernard Sansaricq, speaking at a campaign event for Republican presidential nominee Donald J. Trump, recounted how, back in the 1990s when Bill Clinton was president, the leader of the free world attempted to bribe him.

The year Sansaricq became president of the Haitian Senate, 1994, was the year Clinton attempted to oust an oppressive military regime that was currently ruling the country through an invasion threat. The former Haitian leader told Trump that in an effort to “appease” him at the time, Clinton sent then-U.S. Rep. Bill Richardson, D-New Mexico, to speak to him.

Sansaricq said he spoke to Richardson for some four hours, in his attempt to persuade Clinton, through Richardson, not to invade. He said it would be better to do what President Reagan did in the 1980s to rid a country of an oppressive leader, just “send one plane,” not an army. Sansaricq asked Richardson to “take the message back to President Clinton.”

The following week, the U.S. Embassy in Haiti sent an anonymous messenger back to SanSaricq who allegedly told the Haitian leader if he “sided” with Clinton on the invasion, he would become “the richest man in Haiti.”

As noted further by The Daily Caller, Sansaricq said he declined the offer because he “loves [his] country.” He then said a week later, by executive order, Clinton revoked his visa. Sansaricq said at the time he was a U.S. resident but since then he has become an American citizen.

But that wasn’t all he had to say.

He said he has “all the records” on the Clinton Foundation in its dealings and operations in Haiti following a massive earthquake in 2010 that left 200,000 dead and leveled 100,000 homes [details of which can also be found in this White Paper by NewsTarget editors].

Sansaricq said that the foundation withheld billions of dollars in donations from the stricken country after the earthquake and called upon the family charity to “disclose the audit of all the money.”

Similar claims were made by conservative activist and author Dinesh D’Souza, in a new book released over the summer titled, “Hillary’s America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party.”

“The Haitians were initially sympathetic to the Clintons. One may say they believed in the message of ‘hope and change,’” D’Souza wrote. “Over time, however, the Haitians wised up. Whatever their initial expectations, many saw that much of the aid money seems never to have reached its destination; rather, it disappeared along the way.”

Bill Clinton was designated UN representative and charged with overseeing aid to Haiti. At the time, Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, and she was in charge of the flow of aid to Haiti. Together, they were the two most power people regarding Haiti’s recovery and future.

In the end, Haitians came to realize that much of the “aid” money was not being spent on necessary infrastructure rebuilding, per se, but was going to companies that spent lavishly filling the coffers of the Clinton Foundation.

Again, read more about this and other Clinton “pay for play” schemes here.

Sources:

Clinton Foundation making money by renting stolen land to Federal Bureau of Land Management

September 16, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

Despite all of the corruption surrounding the organization, you can’t help but laugh at all of the news surrounding the Clinton Family Foundation. Having been wrapped up in countless scandals over the years, it almost appears as though the organization was founded for the sole purpose of making the Clinton family look like maniacal thieves with no respect for anyone but themselves.

A quick Google search will lead you to all sorts of information about how Hillary and Bill have essentially been using the organization for the singular purpose of laundering money. Having accepted donations from world leaders who would just so happen to benefit from having close relationships with the Clinton family, there’s little doubt that corruption is afoot in the organization.

These kinds of revelations seem to be brought to light every week or so now. There’s so much shadiness going on within the group that new evidence proving its corruption is no longer surprising.

Take, for instance, the fact that it has recently been unveiled that the Clinton Foundation has some pretty unflattering connections with Russia, of all places.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has been seizing land with the goal of leasing it to high-level donors of the Clinton Foundation. Considering that Hillary has utilized similar tactics in order to receive millions of dollars from Saudi Arabian leaders, there’s not much of a surprise there, despite being quite disgusting and un-American.

And it all comes down to the control of uranium — and the financial gain that comes with it. Red Flag News reports that “Russia gradually gained control of Uranium One, a major mining company, in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State.”

Because of this, Vladimir Putin now controls roughly 20% of uranium that is produced in the United States. Hillary Clinton is at fault for this. For a woman whose presidential campaign has been filled with anti-Russian rhetoric about how Donald Trump and Putin are too friendly with each other, it’s hilarious to discover that Hillary has essentially been in business with the man. What’s not so funny is that the American economy is suffering pretty heavily because of this strange partnership.

Once again, the hypocritical democrats have found a way to destroy the lives of the American people under the guise that they’re fighting for freedom and the safety of the country at large. This is just par for the course these days, but it’s still completely disheartening to know that nothing seems to be changing, despite our lack of satisfaction with the way things are.

It cannot be overstated: Hillary Clinton is unfit to be elected president. From her numerous scandals to her poor health, there’s no denying that she doesn’t have the ability to properly run a country. She’s an absolute mess of a person that values her own checkbook over the wellbeing of the country she claims to love.

Like most of the politicians holding office in the federal government, Hillary Clinton is morally bankrupt, which explains why her bank account is so heavy. She has been selling out the American people to improve the quality of her own life, and it’s time that we send the message that we’re not going to let her do this any longer.

It’s time to be done with Hillary Clinton.

Sources:

RedFlagNews.com

NYTimes.com

Documents provide smoking gun suggesting Clinton used her office for financial gain

August 24, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

Another day, another scandal involving Crooked Hillary and the Clinton Foundation.

No matter how much time passes, Hillary just can’t seem to avoid being wrapped up in a horrible scandal that makes everyone question her true intentions. While her brainwashed followers seem to be unbothered by her corrupt nature, the rest of us are forced to sit in awe by just how much Hillary can get away with.

It has been revealed that while Hillary was secretary of state, more than half the people she met with gave money to the Clinton Foundation shortly thereafter. It doesn’t take a detective to realize that she was exchanging political benefits in exchange for cold, hard cash.

$156 million was “donated” by 85 donors, at least 40 of which gave over $100,000 each, and at least 20 of which gave over $1 million each. For a person in Hillary’s position to have been accepting such massive donations is beyond inappropriate.

While there’s no hard proof that Clinton violated any legal agreements, these are clearly bribes. Her connections with shady organizations and immoral individuals are made even more unsettling know that it seems pretty clear that she’s accepting money from them.

This is all so incredibly dangerous because we don’t know where she draws the line — and that’s what is most worrisome about Clinton somehow being elected this fall.

As President of the United States, this kind of behavior from Clinton could lead to our entire country falling apart.

It’s clear that she is more concerned with her own financial benefit than the success and well-being of the country as a whole, and that could have devastating results for the rest of us. What would it say about the United States that our leader is a money-hungry lunatic that doesn’t care whether or not the citizens of the country live or die?

This is one of the most frightening American elections in history, and we better hope and pray that Hillary doesn’t win.

Sources:

AP.org

RedState.com

Hillary is the candidate of treason: Ties to Russia, Qatar, and Libya revealed

August 8, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

There isn’t much about Hillary Clinton that isn’t tainted, co-opted or politically compromised. Indeed, she may well be the most corrupt presidential candidate in the history of our country.

One of her campaign’s main arguments to voters is that she is imminently more qualified that GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump because of her vast experience as a first lady, a U.S. senator and, most recently, as the Obama administration’s secretary of state.

What she appears to have the most experience in is feathering her own next and helping our enemies gain strategic advantages over us.

First, the Libyan connection.

As reported former judge and Fox News contributor Andrew Napolitano, the Democratic nominee for president has a lot to answer for over her role as facilitator arms to Libyan jihadists.

“To pursue her goal of a ‘democratic’ government there, Clinton, along with Obama and a dozen or so members of Congress from both houses and both political parties, decided she should break the law by permitting U.S. arms dealers to violate the U.N. arms embargo and arm Libyan rebels whom she hoped would one day run the new government,” Napolitano wrote. “So she exercised her authority as secretary of state to authorize the shipment of American-made arms to Qatar, a country beholden to the Muslim Brotherhood and friendly to the Libyan rebels and a country the U.S. had no business arming—unless the purpose of doing so was for the arms to be transferred to the rebels.”

There is evidence to suggest Napolitano’s assertions are true. Memos that were uncovered from the burned American compound in Benghazi and obtained by the Washington Times reveal that U.S. diplomats there were tracking a number of potential U.S.-sanctioned weapons shipments that were ostensibly aimed at arming allies. But at least one of those shipments were sent to the Transitional National Council, a Libyan rebel movement that sought to overthrow leader Moamar Gadafi. And while that shipment appears to have been canceled, a career CIA officer, David Manners, told Fox News in 2015 that the shipment of thousands of rocket launchers and machine guns, as well as millions of rounds of ammunition, did eventually make it to the council – despite a ban on shipping weapons to Libya at the time.

In testimony before the House Select Committee on Benghazi Oct. 22, 2015, Clinton [allegedly] lied under oath and said no such shipments took place.

Next, Clinton – as secretary of state – was also duplicitous in allowing Russia to gain control of one-fifth of all U.S. uranium supplies, a mineral of such strategic importance because of its use in nuclear energy and nuclear weapons. As reported by The New York Times and revealed in the recently released documentary, “Clinton Cash,” both Hillary and Bill Clinton were complicit. For both, their complicity began in 2009, shortly after Hillary took over the State Department.

At the center of the deal are a number of men who are leaders of the Canadian mining industry, all of whom have been major donors to the Clinton Foundation and its various charities. The group’s members built, financed and eventually sold to the Russians a company called Uranium One.

Because uranium is such a strategic asset, the deal had to be approved by a committee comprised of representatives from several U.S. government agencies. Among those that eventually green-lighted the sale was Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

As the Russians gained control of Uranium one in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, according to Canadian records, cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation – to the tune of $2.35 million, donations that were not public disclosed by the Clintons, though Hillary had struck a deal with the White House to make sure all donors were made public.

Shortly after the Russians announced they wanted to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Bill Clinton received a $500,000 check to give a speech in Moscow from a Russian investment bank with links to the government, which was also promoting Uranium One stock.

Promises made to ensure to ease concerns over the deal were repeatedly broken, the Times reported.

Sources:

Clinton Cash film drops BOMBSHELL: Hillary arranging for U.S. uranium resources to be sold to Russia

July 28, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

Unbeknownst to most Americans, uranium is a strategic asset because uranium is one of the most important elements in the construction of nuclear weapons and in the production of nuclear energy.

What most Americans also don’t know is that Hillary and Bill Clinton helped arrange the transfer of one-fifth of all U.S. strategic uranium reserves to Russia, as noted in a newly-released documentary, “Clinton Cash,” based on a book of the same name by Peter Schweizer that documents all donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities.

The deal has its roots both in Hillary Clinton’s State Department and her husband’s foundation, which is now the family foundation and which will more than likely be enhanced if Hillary wins the White House in November.

As reported by The New York Times, in 2013 an article in the Kremlin-backed Russian newspaper Pravda provided details about how Russian atomic energy firm Rosatom was able to gain control of a Canadian company that had uranium mining interests that stretched from Central Asia throughout the American West. When all was said and done, the acquisition of the Canadian firm made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Russian President Vladimir Putin much closer to his overall goal of controlling the lions’s share of the world’s uranium supply.

As the Times noted, at the heart of the deal were a number of men who were the leaders of the Canadian mining industry and who also have been large donors to charitable efforts by Bill Clinton and his family. “Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would later become known as Uranium One,” the Times reported.

Here is the essence of the deal:

— Russia already controls uranium mines in Kazakhstan which are among the world’s most lucrative;

— The deal – which began in 2009 shortly after Hillary Clinton took over at the State Department and was finally completed after three phases in 2013 – gave Russia control over one-fifth of production capacity that takes place on U.S. soil;

— Uranium One’s chairman used his own family’s foundation to mask his donations – making four separate donations to the Clinton Foundation that totaled $2.35 million;

— The Clintons did not publicly disclose those donations even though Hillary Clinton signed an agreement with the Obama White House upon becoming secretary of state that she would publicly identify all donors to the foundation;

— There were others with ties to Uranium One that made donations as well.

Almost immediately after the Russians announced that they would attempt to gain a majority stake in Uranium One, Bill Clinton magically received a check for a half-a-million dollars for a speech he gave in Moscow from a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin and which was promoting Uranium One stock.

The U.S. government and Rosatom also made commitments that were supposed to ease concerns about the deal. But records show those pledges were broken repeatedly.

While the Times boldly claimed that there was no evidence of “pay for play” or quid pro quo, two things are clear: The Russians now own 20 percent of U.S. strategic uranium reserves (a key element needed for nuclear power and nuclear weapons); and both Bill and Hillary Clinton personally arranged, and were enriched by, the deal.

You can watch the entire documentary online for free here.

Sources:

NYTimes.com

BarnesAndNoble.com

YouTube.com