ArchiveArchive
OSU

CNN’s denialist journalism suggests OSU terrorist’s motive is unsolved – yet his OWN WORDS prove otherwise

by Leave a Comment

When news broke of a terrorist attack occurring on Ohio State University’s campus, recent history told many of us that radical Islamic extremism was responsible for the attack. While it is never a good idea to jump to conclusions about these kinds of things, attacks at the hands of Islamic extremists have become so common that it is simply impossible to ignore the trend. Subconsciously, we all knew what was happening, and then our suspicions were confirmed.

Abdul Razak Ali Artan, the attacker in question, revealed via his Facebook page shortly before attempting to murder many on OSU’s campus that he was willing to kill anyone who opposes Islam. This should have been more than enough evidence to show the mainstream media exactly why Artan decided to attack innocent people with a car and a knife, but they have continued to play dumb in order to avoid criticizing the so-called religion of peace.

CNN, unsurprisingly, has been the biggest offender of this.

Max Blau, Emanuella Grinberg and Shimon Prokupecz of CNN report, “Despite claims from the Islamic State’s purported media wing that Artan was an ISIS soldier, there is no indication so far that Artan communicated with any terror group; evidence points to a lone wolf attack. Investigators are inspecting his computer and cell phone and talking to family and associates, as they try to determine what led him to act.”

Of course the Regressive Left falls back on the idiotic “lone wolf” excuse to try and draw attention away from the fact that there is a very real problem with the religion of Islam today. This is not an isolated incident. This is not a few people. There have been so many of these “random” attacks over the past year that we can no longer afford to play nice. We cannot avoid calling these things like we see them anymore.

Our appeasement to the demands of these extremists — by refusing to acknowledge the truth in the name of political correctness — is consequently putting all of our lives at risk. They are only getting stronger as the American media gets weaker. When someone kills, or attempts to kill, in the name of their religion, we have to look into it. We should not pick and choose the religions that we are willing to criticize — and neither should the mainstream media.

 

Sources:

CNN.com

Twitter.com

Dispatch.com

Hillary

Preparation? Two mainstream news reports claimed that Hillary Clinton died

by Leave a Comment

When many alternative media outlets began making claims that Hillary Clinton was in poor health, people were justifiably unconvinced. After all, the reports seemed as if they were reaching at best and downright delusional at worst. As is often the case when it comes to the political sphere, it seemed more like wishful thinking than actual, honest reporting.

Over the past few weeks, though, those alternative media outlets seem to have been proven correct in their reporting.

Photographic and video evidence of Hillary Clinton coughing, stumbling, tripping and fainting have all but proven that the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee is suffering from some form of serious physical illness. People have speculated that she has contracted everything from Alzheimer’s to Parkinson’s and is suffering from the disease in a deathly state.

While there is yet to be hard proof as to what exactly is happening, there’s no denying that something is seriously wrong with Hillary Clinton’s health. No matter what the liberal media will try to convince you, there’s nothing normal about having unstoppable coughing fits or passing out on the sidewalk. These are symptoms of some kind of sickness — there’s no denying that anymore.

Many have even reported that Clinton may be on the verge of death. Considering how ill she has looked as of late, it wouldn’t be especially surprising if her dying were on the horizon, but nothing had been confirmed by anyone close to her.

Well, nothing had been confirmed until two separate branches of ABC News — one national and the other local — preemptively announced that Hillary Clinton had passed away before immediately changing their tune. Shortly after the reports aired, the network corrected their reporters, claiming that they misspoke.

A number of conspiracy theories followed, leaving many to wonder if the woman we’ve known as Hillary Clinton for the past fifteen years actually is who she claims to be. According to The Daily Sheeple, “Something is definitely going on, and a lot of people are asking, did Hillary actually die on 9/11 and what’s happening now is a psyop being perpetrated against the American people? Ground Zero would be a perfect location for it…”

Of course, this belief will be almost immediately discredited as insane, unfounded and evil, but given how bizarre virtually everything about this election cycle has been, would an imposter posing as Hillary be all that surprising?

Still, the most likely outcome is that the liberal media outlets — who clearly have close relationships with the Democratic Party — know that Hillary Clinton is on the verge of death. In turn, they’ve been preparing for what they believe to be her inevitable passing for some time now. It just so happened that they jumped the gun in their initial reporting. Whether or not even this is correct remains to be seen, but there’s definitely more to this story than we’ve been lead to believe…

If there’s one thing we’ve learned about the media over the past five or so years, it’s that the alternative publications tend to expose the truth months before mainstream media sources pick up on it. Could Hillary Clinton’s life-threatening illness be yet another case of this?

 

Sources:

TheDailySheeple.com

RedState.com

hillary

Hillary fed answers via earpiece to media questions

by Leave a Comment

It’s actually kind of a sad situation. No matter how hard Hillary Clinton tries not to appear to be a completely untrustworthy, slimy dunce, she has never been able to break out of that shell. No matter what, she always finds a way to absolutely blow it, en route to appearing less and less fit to be the next president of the United States.

Since she first got into politics, many have posed the theory that Bill Clinton has been pulling the strings, treating her like a puppet who simply regurgitates his ideals in a much more annoying voice. Now, decades later, we have received hard proof that nothing Hillary is saying has been her own thoughts.

Recently, legendary actor and conservative James Woods tweeted an image of Hillary Clinton at the presidential forum with an obvious earpiece lodged in her ear. Given its clear texture and small size, it’s apparent that this was never meant to be seen, but thanks to the advancement of technology, such an act didn’t go unnoticed.

Paul Joseph Watson of Infowars reports, “This is not the first time Clinton has faced charges that she was wearing an earpiece during a crucial event – similar claims were made after her appearance in front of the House Select Benghazi Hearing in October last year.”

As always seems to be the case with the Clinton family, the evidence continues to pile up in regards to finding proof that she is incredibly shady and untrustworthy. If she is genuine, honest and speaking from the heart — like all politicians should be — then why does she need someone to feed her answers to simple questions that merely require honesty and intelligence?

How can we, as a society, pretend that this isn’t a serious issue?

It’s not like we need more reasons not to support her, though. From the Benghazi coverup to the email scandal and her visibly deteriorating health issues, Clinton is unfit to be president — and we’re all in serious trouble if she somehow ends up taking office. It’s deeply upsetting that she somehow managed to get this far in her political career (though it’s no surprise when you consider that many of her detractors end up in body bags), but it has happened and now we must deal with the problem.

As scary as it may be to admit, given the importance of the situation, this is our responsibility, folks. If Hillary is elected, that blood is on our hands. We cannot sit around while this corrupt, lying criminal becomes the leader of the free world. Send a message with your votes this fall.

 

Sources:

Infowars.com

DailyMail.co.uk

Bill-Hillary-Clinton-725x375

Hillary Clinton’s link to terrorism: WikiLeaks CONFIRMS arms deal made with ISIS

by Leave a Comment

In the 1980s during the Reagan administration, various officials within the government and national security structure set up an operation whereby the United States would sell arms to the government of Iran in exchange for the release of some U.S. hostages. Following the sale, the money was then transferred to Contra rebels who were fighting the communist-dominated government of Nicaragua.

There was one major problem with the operation, however: Every phase of it was illegal. U.S. statutes forbade the sale of weapons to Iran, an enemy even back then, and Congress had barred the administration from providing any funding and support to the Contra rebels.

It seems that, in the 2000s, little has changed except the names of the major players. Enter then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

According to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, his organization has obtained a trove of Clinton’s emails that indicate she was at the center of a weapons transfer operation in which many of them wound up in the hands of the Islamic State, otherwise known as ISIS.

As reported by Democracy Now, in March WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for more than 30,000 emails and attachments that were sent to and from Clinton’s private email servers that she set up and used while at the head of the State Department.

The operation managed to retrieve roughly 50,000 pages of documents that span from June 2010 to August 2014. Of those, 7,500 documents were sent by Clinton. The State Department had released the emails as part of a Freedom of Information Act request.

In an interview, Assange – who described WikiLeaks as a “rebel library of Alexandria,” said that Clinton’s emails were mated with diplomatic cables with other Clinton materials he has already published on the site, “creating a rich picture” of how the Democratic presidential nominee functions in office.

More broadly, Assange said, the emails and other documents provide insight into how the State Department in general operates.

“So, for example,” he said, “the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails.

“There’s more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone,” Assange added.

What he’s saying is this: The Obama administration, via Clinton’s State Department, supplied weapons to the world’s foremost terrorist power, and Clinton’s emails prove it.

Assange is, in effect, confirming what the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi has said: That the Clinton-led policy in Libya during the so-called “Arab Spring” ultimately allowed U.S. weapons to flow into the hands of not only ISIS but also elements of Al Qaeda in Syria.

Former CIA operative Clare Lopez, who was a co-author of the report, also noted that scores of other operatives were involved in a sort of gun-running scheme, and that a group of lawmakers known as the “Gang of Eight,” at a minimum, were aware of the operation.

The evidence is clear that Clinton not only made the wrong decisions regarding U.S. policy in Libya and Syria, but that her actions led to the arming, aiding and abetting of an enemy.

One other recent development that seems to indicate Clinton is with the terrorists, not Americans. During a campaign speech in Orlando, Fla., this week, Seddique Mateen, father of the Orlando shooter, was seen sitting in the crowd behind her, cheering her on.

To date, Clinton has not disavowed Mateen or what his son did. And for the record, Mateen supports the Afghan Taliban.

Sources for this story include:

Breitbart.com

AIM.org  [PDF]

DemocracyNow.org

TownHall.com

DailyCaller.com

Breitbart.com