ArchiveArchive
WhiteHouse

Death threats from unhinged Leftists did nothing to sway Electoral College outcome; electors ignored the idiots and did their duty

by Leave a Comment

In the weeks since Donald J. Trump handily vanquished his Democratic presidential foe, two-time loser Hillary Clinton, by winning majorities in states that haven’t voted for a Republican in decades, the angry, unhinged Left has been working overtime to intimidate and threaten members of the Electoral College into changing their vote and denying the billionaire businessman his rightful victory.

On Monday, however, they were once again unsuccessful, as the majority of GOP electors did their duty and selected Trump to be the 45th president of the United States.

But even up to the final day – Monday, Jan. 19 – when votes were to be cast, electors were under siege by the so-called “mainstream” media, by Left-wing academics, by legal institutions and by the billionaire financiers who helped fund all of the summer’s violence against Trump supporters.

One way electors were being targeted right up to the end included the planting of fake news stories and phony polls. For instance, a YouGov “poll” allegedly shows that more than half of Americans, or 52 percent, wanted the electoral college vote delayed until electors could be “briefed” on supposed “intelligence” that Russia “hacked” the election in favor of Trump.

As noted by Hot Air, the polling was skewed (intentionally) because the questions were skewed (intentionally). For one, the questioning did not even explain what exactly Moscow has been accused of doing or what exactly Moscow is believed to have done to influence the outcome of the Nov. 8 election. At first, the story was, “fake news” planted in “alternative media” sites by “Russian propagandists” is what destroyed Clinton’s chances of winning and helped Trump. When this lie was exposed as completely made up, the next lie became, “The Russians hacked the election.” Yet no one has ever bothered to explain just how that happened, and what Moscow actually did to alter the election’s end result.

Threats and voter intimidation should be investigated and prosecuted

In addition, these purveyors of hate and discontent went so far, even, as to threaten the lives of some electors, which appears to be blatantly illegal on its face, but also violates federal rules against voter intimidation. If threatening someone over their decision to honor a pledge to cast a ballot for a president-elect isn’t voter intimidation, then it doesn’t exist. Hopefully the incoming law and order administration of Trump will rectify this issue with some arrests and prosecutions.

The Associated Press reported Monday that it wasn’t likely Trump would be denied the Oval Office; only one GOP elector, Chris Suprun from Texas – who is nothing but a massive fraud and not a 9/11 “first responder” to the Pentagon, as he claimed – had said publicly that he would change his ballot. Given his lies about his past, it’s quite obvious that this is someone without much integrity in the first place.

Still, it’s the effort at discrediting both Trump and the election results that is most troubling – not just for the incoming administration, but for the country in general. We don’t want to create the impression that because one side lost the election the other side does not have the legitimacy and moral authority to govern. Yet the Left is attempting to create this very impression using the argument that Trump is not legitimate because he lost the popular vote.

He did lose the popular vote – by about 2.5 million votes. All of which were in California. So what does that mean? In this case, according to James E. Campbell, a distinguished professor of political science at the University of Buffalo-SUNY, it means that the Electoral College system worked exactly as our founders envisioned it.

Hey, whiny Leftists: Our election system worked just like the founders envisioned

The Left is claiming that the EC’s “creator,” Alexander Hamilton, believed that electors should not be constitutionally bound by the popular vote to cast their lot in with the election winner if they thought him a fool or otherwise not fit to be president (this is not the case with Trump despite the Left’s claim that he is unfit). But what Hamilton also envisioned as a role for the Electoral College is that it would give equal voice to smaller states. Hamilton explains:

Donald Trump’s election is difficult for many Americans to accept, but there is no good reason to question its democratic legitimacy. For better or worse, Trump won the presidency by constitutional and sensible democratic rules that guided both campaigns and were known to any politically conscious citizen. He also won the national popular vote cast outside of the single state of California. Moreover, Clinton won all of California’s 55 electoral votes despite the fact that 4.3 million of the state’s voters voted for Trump. That big winner-take-all advantage for California’s Democrats and Clinton was certainly felt, but it wasn’t enough to override her losses in many other states. Under our electoral-vote system, American voters elected a national president, not California’s choice.

In other words, just because California is a large state does not give it outsized authority to literally choose our presidents. Besides, if we had no Electoral College and presidents were elected by popular vote, both Clinton and Trump would have campaigned differently instead of just concentrating on “battleground states.”

Now that Trump has been duly awarded the presidential prize he won fair and square Nov. 8, the pathetic, shrill and childish Left will not simply “go away” and allow him to govern. They will continue to obstruct, challenge and undermine him at every turn. Expect more shrillness, more insanity and more threats.

Sources:

AVAAZ.org[PDF]

HotAir.com

Freedom.news

CBSNews.com

MarketWatch.com

donald-trump1-777x437

‘Hamilton Electors’ plan to strip presidency from Trump

by Leave a Comment

A group calling itself the “Hamilton Electors” has called for members of the Electoral College to pick a “consensus candidate” to replace president-elect Donald Trump.

The Electoral College meets on December 19 to decide on the president.

Hillary Clinton registered 64,654,483 total votes, compared to 62,418,820 for Trump, according to a Cook Political Report analysis, the International Business Times reports. If the report is accurate, the numbers represent a margin of 2,235,663 in the popular vote for the former secretary of state.

Washington State Democratic elector Levi Guerra told The Olympian Trump is a “demagogue.” She believes “that there are Republican leaders out there that the whole country can unify behind.”

Bret Chiafalo is the leader of the Hamilton Electors. He claims that blocking Trump is a “moral imperative.” Chiafalo cites Trump’s campaign rhetoric on immigrants and Muslims and his appointment of Steven Bannon as a senior advisor. The establishment press and Democrats describe Bannon, who formerly ran Breitbart News, as a white nationalist.

Chiafalo suggested Ohio Gov. John Kasich, former Secretary of State Colin Powell and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg as possible alternative candidates.

The Hamilton Electors and others opposed to the election result are attempting to persuade enough Democratic and Republican electors to unite behind a third candidate. They hope to strip Trump of the 270 votes required for the presidency. In that case, the decision would be left up to the House of Representatives.

The Hamilton Electors are part of a larger effort to disqualify Trump and ultimately dump the Electoral College. The Electoral College was first proposed by Alexander Hamilton, and was approved by the Constitutional Convention on September 6, 1787.

Democrats say that they have formed a coalition of lawyers prepared to defend, pro bono, any electors who vote to oppose Trump.

“I have always believed we should have a national popular vote. That’s been my position now for decades,” Colorado’s Polly Baca told Politico.

Sources:

IBTimes.com

TheOlympian.com

Politico.com

Soros Hack

Exposed: Leaked intel reveals Soros funding being used to manipulate the election

by Leave a Comment

Leaked documents have revealed that George Soros and his various foundations have been making a concerted effort to manipulate election rules and process laws far more than other reports have previously indicated.

Soros, a billionaire and convicted felon, has moved hundreds of millions of dollars to silently sway election laws, fuel litigious attacks against election integrity efforts,  push mainstream narratives about voter fraud and support leftist ground games — such as inciting fear among minority groups by creating imagined threats to their voting rights.

These efforts have been passed through dozens of 501(c)(3) and (c)(4) charities and utilized active compliance with rights groups, government officials, and even supposedly non-partisan groups such as League of Women Voters.

InfoWars reported that the leaked documents have also uncovered  deliberate and successful efforts to manipulate mainstream media coverage of election issues.

Republicans and Conservatives reportedly “have no opposing effort or source of funds that represents even a small fraction in opposition to level of the Soros-led manipulation contained in the leaked documents.”

Citizenship verification and voter ID laws are just some of the election integrity measures that Soros has used his financial prowess against.  PJ Media reports that through immense financial backing,  Soros has, “propped up left-leaning media to attack reports of voter fraud, and conducted racially and ideologically targeted voter registration drives.”

These racially-targeted voter registration drives were conveniently executed when Soros was also fueling other efforts to polarize racial minority groups by inciting fear of police officers and the alleged loss of voting rights.

George Soros — a convicted criminal — is treating this election like a game; he thinks if he spends enough money, he can put Hillary Clinton in office and essentially own the US. Hopefully, the American people are finally seeing through their shiny facades and put a stop to their plans.

Sources:

InfoWars.com

PJMedia.com

electronic voting

Voter fraud: CA resident finds about 90 ballots marked with the same address, mysterious names

by Leave a Comment

Regardless of what the authoritarian leftists have done in order to ensure that we don’t question their twisted motives, all the evidence points to the fact that there is a severe problem with voter fraud in the United States. Thousands — if not millions — of votes are placed across the country that are fraudlent. If they are not under the name of a dead person, they are duplicate votes that should not exist either.

Because of this, it’s no wonder that the Democratic Party fights so hard against passing laws that would make it significantly more difficult to commit voter fraud. They are the ones who benefit from this act of corruption since they cannot receive an adequate number of votes based solely on merit. Even when you consider the brainwashed masses, the American people at large are intelligent enough to know that there is no hope for the future of the DNC.

If you need more evidence to the fact that there is a major voter fraud problem, consider what recently happened to California resident Jerry Mosna. Mosna recently accidentally received 83 unused ballots in the mail — all of which were addressed to people with different names, each supposedly living in the single apartment next door to Mosna. The man realized there was something extremely wrong going on, so he turned the ballots into the local police department, which is currently investigating the case.

The Los Angeles County Registrar’s Office issued a statement which read, “We are carefully reviewing our records and gathering information to fully identify what took place. Our preliminary assessment is that this appears to be an isolated situation related to a system error that occurred causing duplicate ballots to be issued to an address entered for a single voter. We are working directly with the system vendor to ensure the issue is addressed and to identify any similar occurrences.”

News like this makes it extremely difficult to take the voting process seriously. It has been proven that there is so much corruption in United States politics that believing that individual votes matter can be a tough task. Still, numerous elections throughout history have been extremely close, so it is our duty as freedom-loving Americans to make our voices heard and get out to the polls on election day.

This election has a lot riding on it and we need to take that into account. The longterm freedom of the United States is always at risk, so we have to do our part to make sure that it is safe. We have to fight voter fraud with honesty and integrity. It’s up to us, people.

 

Sources:

FoxNews.com

DailyMail.co.uk

WesternJournalism.com

Google

Google’s bias algorithm can manipulate up to 10 million undecided voters, rigging the election for Hillary

by Leave a Comment

It isn’t much of a secret that the mainstream media is fighting desperately to ensure that Hillary Clinton wins the presidential election. Between the lack of coverage on the Wikileaks email hacks, the constant assault on Donald Trump’s past and the complete disregard for third party candidates, those working the mainstream are visibly biased in support of Crooked Hillary.

Not even search engines are beyond this corruption, with Google currently utilizing a biased algorithm that hides news coverage that paints Hillary Clinton in a negative light, while not offering the same for Donald Trump, Gary Johnson or Jill Stein. This shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, given the fact that Google parent company chairman Eric Schmidt recently offered to be a “head outside advisor” for the campaign. But when people are relying on search engines in order to find news stories, it is very upsetting to discover that the truth is being hidden.

In an interview with Russian Times, psychologist and author Robert Epstein broke down how this kind of biased algorithm could manipulate up to 10 million undecided voters, more than enough to skew the election in one direction or another. Epstein states, “Through several years of research, I found that they had the power to control elections, the power to shift the votes. So, that was more than four years of experimental research … . We established through some very careful experiments that by favoring one candidate in search rankings Google can shift a lot of votes. More than 20 percent of undecided voters overall, and in some demographic groups up to 80 percent of undecided voters.”

Of course, you have to wonder what would lead someone to consider voting for Hillary Clinton in the first place. As if her untrustworthy, slimy nature didn’t disqualify her from receiving support from the American people, the seemingly endless scandals most definitely should. It’s clear after any significant research that she is a dangerous person that should not be trusted by the American people. If only discovering the truth weren’t such an issue, then these problems wouldn’t arise in the first place.

But since the mainstream media has proven that they are willing to go to great lengths in order to suppress the truth and support Hillary Clinton, we have to get creative if we want to know what’s really going on in the world. The truth is out there, and it is up to us to spread it. If Google won’t get with the program, then the rest of us have to do it for them.

Sources:

InfoWars.com

WashingtonTimes.com

RT.com

hillary

Hillary’s ridiculous claim that she ‘will not add a penny to the national debt’ is absurd and impossible

by Leave a Comment

Hillary Clinton is no stranger to lying to the American people in order to make herself sound more fit to hold the presidency of the United States. After all, her entire campaign has been based on a number of lies, scandals and other forms of corruption. But when you take a look at the promises she has made, it is clear that she has absolutely no way of fulfilling them. Nobody should believe, for even a second, that she will be able to make any of this happen.

For the libertarians and conservatives of the country, one of the things we are most concerned about is the rising debt that the federal government continues to accumulate. By spending money on things that we don’t need, our country has slipped further and further into a debt of trillions and trillions of dollars. Hillary Clinton’s claims that she “will not add a penny to the national debt” is absolutely unbelievable, given the fact that she also wants to increase taxes and continue to spend money on things that the American people do not want or need.

Russell Berman of The Atlantic writes that even if Hillary Clinton is able to enact all of the policies she desires, “the national debt will still go way up during her time in office. The national debt now stands at about $19.7 trillion, and if policymakers wanted to keep it there, they’d have to approve hundreds of billions of dollars in immediate spending cuts or tax increases—neither of which Clinton is actually proposing.”

In summation, there is virtually no way that Hillary Clinton is telling the truth here — and it just goes to show just how out of touch and delusional she is. She seems to think — or at least wants the American people to think — that she can destroy the country financially without causing the national debt to increase. Having someone like that as the figurehead of our country would be extremely dangerous for reasons far beyond the economy.

This is a dangerous woman that couldn’t be any less fit to be president. Yet, that appears to be exactly what is going to happen come November 8th. So many people have bought into the myth of Hillary Clinton that we are doomed. The only way to combat this corruption is by getting out to the polls and sending a message to the establishment. We don’t want to add to the national debt and we don’t want President Clinton, part two.

 

Sources:

WashingtonPost.com

TheAtlantic.com

BusinessInsider.com

Trump

The upcoming election can be hacked, Trump already claiming it’s rigged

by Leave a Comment

Sadly, there’s very little that seems to prevent elections in the United States from being completely rigged. Thanks to the staggering voter fraud numbers — which we recently learned is in the millions — any election can be swayed in one way or another. Potentially, though, the election can be hacked and skewed in a way that doesn’t need traditional voter fraud methods in order to succeed — and we should all be terrified as a result.

Since the beginning of the year, Donald Trump has been warning the American people that the leftists are trying to rig the election. While the mainstream media has made claims that this is just Trump trying to make excuses for an impending loss, there’s a lot of proof that there actually is corruption within the federal government.

If the Regressive Left is willing to go to the lengths they are to cover up Hillary Clinton’s shadiness, then they are surely willing to go to even greater lengths to ensure that she is victorious — and considering that nobody in their right mind would ever willingly vote for such a despicable candidate, they’re having to rely on idiots and corruption to do their bidding.

Similarly, the Democrats themselves have warned of potential rigging in favor of the Republican Party. The Daily Sheeple reports, “73% of Republicans – and according to one poll, 41% of all voters – believe the election could be stolen by Clinton and her lackeys in the media. Democrats urgently warn that there’s a real threat that Russia could hack our election to steal it for Trump. The alternative media has been warning for years that America’s voting systems are so poorly-designed that it would be child’s play to steal an election.”

At the end of the day, it doesn’t really matter who the theoretical hackers are swaying the election in favor of, what really matters is that it is possible to rig the election. The United States of America is supposed to be the greatest power in the world, so it’s absolutely embarrassing that foreign powers could potentially be controlling the election. If these rumors are correct, then a Hillary victory could very well lead to World War III. The Russian powers have already threatened this and the widespread hatred of Clinton will only make matters worse.

Either way, we need to be prepared for the worst when it comes to the 2016 presidential election. Because no matter how it turns out, things aren’t going to be looking up…

 

Sources:

TheDailySheeple.com

WSJ.com

TheFederalist.com

graveyard

Voter fraud: Dead people are voting

by Leave a Comment

A Halloween horror story has come to life a few weeks before the holiday actually takes place, but this ghost story is not as delightful as the ones told around the campfire. It seems as though dead people are voting all throughout the United States, but their corpses are not rising from the grave and stumbling to the polling booth — no, they have become victims of voter fraud.

This is what happens when voter registrations that are connected to deceased individuals remain in use. While liberals across the country have claimed that this really isn’t much of a problem, the statistics prove otherwise. See, it was recently reported that a staggering 18 million invalid voter registrations exist in the United States, which is more than enough to sway an entire election in one way or the other. It’s also shocking that somehow this level of corruption was able to slip through the cracks. That is, unless the federal government has been involved all along, which is never out of the question.

John Gibbs of The Federalist reports that there is a reason why the leftists continue to push their narrative, stating, “The science of criminal justice tells us that many crimes go unreported, and the more ‘victimless’ the crime, the more this happens. The fact is, a person attempting to commit voter fraud is very unlikely to be caught, which increases the incentive to commit the crime.”

To say that this is a frightening fact is a huge understatement. We should all be way more upset about this than most appear to be. After all, the right to vote should be much more sacred than it is, having this level of fraud attached to it. Our voices should matter — they shouldn’t be drowned out by 18 million fakes. It also begs the question: which party is receiving the most benefit by these fake voters existing? Perhaps the fact that we don’t know for sure is the reason why members of both the Republican and Democrat parties have been mostly silent on the issue — they know that it could be helping them get elected.

That’s the kind of behavior that we should all be trying to vote against, though.

Somehow this story would be much less frightening if zombies crawled out of the ground and began showing up at the polling places. At least there’s no widespread government corruption in that scenario.

 

Sources:

TheFederalist.com

NBCNews.com

WashingtonTimes.com

gunstrump (1)

October Surprise: Top Democrat Threatens to Take Down Trump

by Leave a Comment

David Brock, the conservative-turned-progressive who founded American Bridge, a Democrat PAC funded by George Soros, is offering millions of dollars for Apprentice footage showing Clinton rival Donald Trump in a bad light.

Former contestants, crew members, and editors told the Associated Press Trump had treated women on the show inappropriately. Insiders said Trump demeaned women with sexist language and talked about which contestants he would like to have sex with.

“If a $5 million ‘leak fee’ is what stands between truth and total Trump implosion, sign me up,” Brock said in an email to BuzzFeed News.

Brock’s remark is in response to comments by Emmy Award-winning producer Chris Nee. On Sunday Nee said the producers of Trump’s reality game show have outtake footage of the billionaire presidential candidate saying the “N-word.” Trump was fired from the show by NBC executives in 2015 after he allegedly made derogatory comments about Mexican-Americans.

Nee said Apprentice staffers are intimidated by a $5 million penalty if they leak the footage.

Last week The Washington Post reported on lewd comments made by Trump in 2005. During a conversation caught on a hot microphone, Trump said women allow men to have sex with them when they are celebrities. Trump made the remark while talking with Billy Bush of Access Hollywood.

Bill Pruitt, a producer of the Apprentice show, tweeted on Sunday that Trump made “far worse” remarks on tape than what was revealed during the Access Hollywood incident.

Mark Burnett, also an Apprentice producer and a Trump supporter, told BuzzFeed News the show is under increasing pressure to release the tapes before the election. Burnett has told staffers they will face legal action if footage is leaked.

Last week WikiLeaks released the Hollywood Access tape.

Be advised, the video includes obscene language:

Many Republicans, however, have said they are not concerned with Trump’s comments and will vote for him regardless.

Sources

Associated Press

BuzzFeed News

The Washington Post

28736470374_f9fbe46dfe_b

SOURCES: EMP attack to be unleashed on America to stop election if Trump looks likely to win

by Leave a Comment

There have been many dire predictions – mainly from the political Left – about what would happen in the U.S. and the world if Republican presidential nominee Donald J. Trump beats his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, next month.

Financial ruin. Loss of U.S. allies. Stock market collapse. And now, an electromagnetic pulse attack on our country that would throw us back to the 18th century in terms of technology.

As noted by Dave Hodges of The Common Sense Show, four separate sources have contacted him in recent days with some shocking observations and predictions, all of which appear to add up to one thing: A Trump victory would lead to a catastrophic attack on our country, perhaps using an EMP weapon.

One source who works at a nuclear power plant told Hodges that “Palo Verde Unit 2 tripped” one night just recently, meaning it went from 100 percent power to 0 percent. And while that one incident wasn’t particularly newsworthy, the source went on to say that U-1 and U-3 units tripped at different times during the previous two weeks. That’s bizarre, the source said, because “these units will normally run ‘breaker to breaker’ with NO issues at all,” adding they run for 18 straight months without problems.

A second source who also works at a nuclear plant speculated that officials with the Department of Homeland Security, FEMA and the North American Electric Reliability Corp. may believe that a “grid down scenario” is coming because the premise of the plant inspection was to find out how long the facility could continue cooling its fuel rods without power before a meltdown began. The answer: 10 days – an answer that “scared the hell out of them.”

The third source, Gary Haevin, the producer of Amerigedon, told Hodges on a recent program of the EMP event (interview can be accessed here; the EMP discussion begins around the 10:00 mark). Haevin said he knows someone very influential in the Trump campaign and that they’ve been told the globalists would unleash an EMP attack to stop the election from taking place if it looks like the GOP nominee will win. “Trump is a real threat to their world order, and I don’t think they’re going to allow it to happen,” Haevin said.

Finally, a fourth source – a former military commander – said directly that an EMP attack was definitely a consideration if it looks like Trump can beat Clinton in just a few short weeks. “He said an EMP attack was still very much on the table and that we are looking at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and DHS preparing to strengthen the defense of our nuclear power plants. He said they have stepped up the plants ability to maintain cooling capabilities in case of an EMP attack,” Hodges wrote on his web site.

Sources:

Mediaarchives.gsradio.net

NERC.com

NewsTarget.com