ArchiveArchive

Obama’s new policy registration may very well have ended all non-GMO agriculture in the US

January 4, 2017 by Jude Henry Leave a Comment

President Obama’s pen has stayed so busy signing executive orders (EO) that it’s surprising it hasn’t yet run dry, and as his days in the Oval Office wind down, he has added another one to his lengthy list of such orders. The recent “Advancing the Global Health Security Agenda to Achieve a World Safe and Secure from Infectious Disease Threats” EO is particularly significant in that it may have put a halt to all non-GMO agriculture in the United States.

Key points of the EO

Section 1 of the EO includes some disturbing points:

“As articulated in the National Strategy for Countering Biological Threats and implemented in Presidential Policy Directive 2 (PPD-2), promoting global health security is a core tenet of our national strategy for countering biological threats. No single nation can be prepared if other nations remain unprepared to counter biological threats; therefore, it is the policy of the United States to advance the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA), which is a multi-faceted, multi-country initiative intended to accelerate partner countries’ measurable capabilities to achieve specific targets to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats (GHSA targets), whether naturally occurring, deliberate, or accidental.” [Emphasis added]

Coordinated effort with military backup

Section 2 of the EO states that the “Council” will include personnel from a multitude of federal government agencies, including the Departments of State, Defense, Justice, Agriculture, Health and Human Services, and Homeland Security, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The Department of Defense (DOD) may “facilitate implementation and coordination of Department of Defense programs to further the GHSA, as well as provide technical expertise to measure and evaluate progress in countries the United States has made a commitment to assist.” In other words, the military will enforce this EO if deemed necessary.

Connection to GMOs

How does this tie in with GMOs? The government claims that farm animals are supposedly infected (but typically are not) and must be slaughtered to make way for their “vastly upgraded” counterparts, which are genetically engineered and thus patented and owned by global organizations. The public receives a fear-based agenda riddled with hysteria over disease threats, and they respond to that by willingly going along with the GMO agenda. It’s a convenient agenda for the powers that be, as it allows them to maintain tight control of the food supply while attempting to obliterate small and organic farms.

Unrealistic aims and better alternatives

The EO is titled “Advancing the Global Health Security Agenda to Achieve a World Safe and Secure from Infectious Disease Threats,” but achieving a world like that is unrealistic. Infectious disease threats have always existed on this planet. The title implies a fear of infections, which is portrayed in the popular music video Vaccine Zombie by Mike Adams. As the lyrics say, “I’m afraid of invisible germs … .” Rather than promoting GMOs and toxic initiatives to address infectious disease concerns, a more effective approach involves educating people to lead healthy lifestyles through nutrition and other immune system-fortifying natural strategies.

Action steps

Don’t be fooled by the impressive- and altruistic-sounding title of this EO. Spread the word about GMO dangers by working to inform family and friends through intelligent conversations and the sharing of relevant online content. We can take back our food supply and end the danger of GMOs for ourselves and future generations. Stay tuned as the GMO issue continues to unfold, and be grateful that Obama’s days of signing his name to oppressive executive orders are rapidly winding down as the January inauguration approaches.

Sources:

NaturalBlaze

WhiteHouse

NaturalNews

Does the EPA have all of Monsanto’s hidden science regarding glyphosate and GMOs?

January 3, 2017 by Natural News Editors Leave a Comment

As you sit down to your various holiday feasts during the next week or so, maybe you ought to think about what’s in your food.

Do you really know the chemicals and GMO ingredients, which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) probably EVEN doesn’t know many of them due to Monsanto’s probable unreported and/or hidden ‘science’ not surrendered as part of the ‘approval’ process for either glyphosate, Roundup® and Roundup Ready seeds for soy, corn, canola, alfalfa, cotton, and sorghum—with wheat under development!

(Article by Catherine J Frompovich, republished from NaturalBlaze.com)

It’s bad enough that numerous crops are “staged” with glyphosate spraying several days before harvest, which impregnates them with glyphosate residues, and that could be a contributing factor and reason for “gluten intolerance.” Genetically modifying wheat is NOT a good idea, since wheat is the western world’s grain, similar to rice being the eastern world’s grain. And “Golden Rice” hasn’t been accepted very well either.

Monsanto’s lobbyist, Patrick Moore, refuses to drink some Roundup® after proclaiming it won’t hurt you because, as he says, “I’m not an idiot!” What does it tell you about that herbicide and, especially, Monsanto’s own lobbyist, who was promoting GMO Golden Rice, and their products?

Here’s an interesting article from the Harvard University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences website titled “Why Roundup Ready Crops Have Lost Their Allure”. Still, corporate interests are pushing federal approval agencies to inundate the human and animal food chains with many more GMOs. [1]

EcoWatch produced the article “15 Health Problems Linked to Monsanto’s Roundup,” which include: ADHD, Alzheimer’s disease, Anencephaly (birth defects), Autism, Brain cancer, Cancer, Celiac disease and gluten intolerance, chronic Kidney disease, Colitis, Depression, Diabetes, Heart disease, Hypothyroidism, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBS) and “Leaky Gut Syndrome”, Liver disease, Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS), Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Parkinson disease, Pregnancy problems (infertility, miscarriages, stillbirths), Obesity, Reproductive problems, and Respiratory illnesses. [2]

There’s been a rather interesting rumor circulating around Monsanto and GMO foods for quite a while now and it is: In the Monsanto corporate dining room, only organically-grown foods must be served! Can a whistleblower come forth to provide proof of that? If that is factual, then that’s something not only the public must know, but all regulatory agencies dealing with approving their respective aspects of GMOs: the U.S. FDA, USDA and EPA!

In the meantime, Food Democracy NOW has a petition website going titled “Tell the EPA to Release ALL of Monsanto’s Hidden Data on Glyphosate and GMOs”.

I heartily recommend readers read and sign now.

Are you aware that “in 1985, the EPA’s own scientists declared glyphosate to be a Category C ‘possible human carcinogen’ after reviewing studies submitted by Monsanto during the original approval”?

However, there are photographs of two-year-old rats from GMO feed studies that resulted in massive tumors. Monsanto’s studies presented for GMO approvals stopped at 90 DAYS, not the normal two-year-life-cycle of rats!

Relative to Monsanto’s 90-day study, EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) stated,

“With respect to the detection of potential unintended eﬀects in whole GM food and feed, it is unlikely that substances present in small amounts and with a low toxic potential will result in any observable (unintended) eﬀects in a 90-day rodent feeding study, as they would be below the no-observed-eﬀect-level and thus of unlikely impact to human health at normal intake levels.

Laboratory animal feeding studies of 90-days duration appear to be suﬃcient to pick up adverse eﬀects of diverse compounds that would also give adverse eﬀects after chronic exposure.”

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2008.1057/epdf (Pg. S-4)

However, “Seralini’s long-term study linking glyphosate to rat tumors was unfortunately retracted from the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology due to pressure from Monsanto lobbyists. The results of the study have since been republished in Environmental Sciences Europe.” [3]

Look what’s happened to food in Europe, which previously was relatively clean of GMOs!

In June 2015, EFSA issued a new guidance document on the information that companies need to provide when applying for renewed authorisation to import GM plants for food and feed into the European Union. The European Commission grants authorizations to place GM food and feed on the European market for a period of ten years. [4]

Could that impact your food shopping and buying practices regarding foods produced in Europe? It certainly ought to affect what previously was considered GMO-free foods coming from European countries.

What do you think?

Aren’t consumers entitled to know what’s in the food we are eating, e.g., GMOs and how that food was grown or produced/manufactured?

Shouldn’t there be “reverse advertising” on all food labels, e.g., no GMOs or GMO-free?

Shouldn’t the PLU identity number “8” be mandatory for all foods containing GMOs or grown as GMOs? [5]

Currently, the PLU identity number “9” identifies organically-grown food.

Won’t you please tell the EPA what you think about GMOs and sign the petition? Thanks!

Wikileaks emails show Clinton’s campaign plan to “control” narrative about her health

October 24, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

Hillary Clinton’s health has been called into question for months now, with the conservative and alternative media outlets being the front-runners in pointing out that something seems unusual about the manner in which she behaves. From the coughing fits to the collapsing and the general weirdness that Hillary evokes, there are plenty of reasons to grow suspicious about the Democrat presidential nominee — she has given us absolutely no reason to think otherwise.

When it comes to Hillary Clinton’s lies and corruption, Wikileaks has consistently been exposing the truth over the past few months, much to the chagrin of the Democrats and the Clinton campaign. For them, the truth coming out ensures that the American people will discover just how evil and generally unfit to be president Hillary is, so they’re doing everything in their power to stop it.

The recent Wikileaks email leaks show that Clinton’s campaign has been looking into how to combat the media from investigating Hillary’s health, proving that they are trying to hide something. After all, if there’s nothing suspicious going on, then why not be completely transparent with her health records? They’re clearly keeping details about Hillary secret from the American people.

Kosar of The Political Insider writes, “Last week, True Pundit placed a $1 million reward on the release of her full medical history. Clinton is now rumored to be suffering from a plethora of medical ailments, including: dementia, post-concussion syndrome, Parkinson’s Disease, brain tumor, brain injury, complex partial seizures, and many more alleged ailments.”

It’s clear that Hillary’s health is a source of concern to virtually everyone from the media to the politicians and even the Clinton campaign itself. So why not ease the minds of everyone by releasing her health records? The only logical reason is because they are trying to hide devastating revelations and the Wikileaks emails cement this belief even more.

In all honesty, though, Hillary’s dwindling health is far down on the list of things that disqualify her from being fit to hold the presidency. She’s an awful candidate in virtually every way, even when you disregard that she is clearly in poor health. From the numerous scandals to the horrid policies, there is no logical reason to desire another President Clinton, yet here we are.

We are in serious trouble if she ends up being elected. If that day comes, her health will truly be the last thing to worry about.

Sources:

Breitbart.com

ThePoliticalInsider.com

WashingtonTimes.com

Hillary avoided ER to hide information about her health from being leaked

September 15, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

One of the most talked about issues concerning the 2016 presidential election has become Hillary Clinton’s seemingly poor health, which has appeared to grow increasingly terrible over the past few weeks. While many alternative media outlets have been reporting on her apparent sickness for years now, visual evidence is finally being brought to light thanks to increased press coverage on the presidential hopeful.

As a result, the Clinton campaign has been going out of their way to assure voters that Hillary is in perfectly good health. Of course, they’ve also claimed that she had an allergic reaction, pneumonia and was overheated all at once, but they continue to assure the easily manipulated voters on the Regressive Left that Hillary Clinton will live forever.

Anyone with a brain and working eyeballs can see that Hillary Clinton is not in the best of health. Whether or not she is on the verge of death has yet to be proven, but people that are in top form simply do not have daily coughing fits on pass out so frequently that they need constant handlers to make sure they stay upright. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure out that something just isn’t right here.

Now it has been revealed that there’s even more to the story than initially believed.

Shortly after collapsing at the September 11th memorial ceremony, Hillary Clinton was rushed to the emergency room — but her campaign prevented that from happening and instead took Hillary to her daughter, Chelsea’s home. Why would they do such a thing? Why wouldn’t they take the precaution to ensure that Hillary was truly safe? Given that she has appeared in visibly poor condition as of late, it’s shocking that anyone would choose not to take her to get checked out by a professional.

The only logical explanation here is that those close to Hillary know exactly what is wrong with her and are doing everything in their power to prevent news from breaking to the public. They’re going as far as to keep her out of hospitals so that not even doctors can leak information to the American people.

From that information, one can infer that Hillary Clinton has more serious ailments than just bad allergies or a bout with pneumonia. It seems as though the alternative media was right all along when they reported that Hillary is battling some form of serious disease.

Whether it be Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s, whatever is wrong with Hillary very likely makes her unfit to hold the most important position in the country. Whoever is holding that office needs to have an incredible level of mental and physical health — and Hillary seems to be the furthest from that.

Sources:

NYPost.com

DailyMail.co.uk

Blackmail: Aetna Threatened Obamacare Pullout if Humana Merger not Approved

August 19, 2016 by Kurt Nimmo Leave a Comment

Aetna, one of the largest healthcare corporations in America, has threatened to drop out of Obamacare.

In July, the corporation sent a letter to the Justice Department stating it plans to roll back much if not all of its Obamacare business if a merger with rival Humana is not approved. Aetna had announced it would acquire the company for $37,000,000,000 in cash and stock.

“It is very likely that we would need to leave the public exchange business entirely and plan for additional business efficiencies should our deal ultimately be blocked,” Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini said in a letter dated July 5. The letter arrived more than two weeks before the DOJ decided to oppose the merger.

The Huffington Post obtained the letter through a Freedom of Information Act request.

“Specifically, if the DOJ sues to enjoin the transaction, we will immediately take action to reduce our 2017 exchange footprint …. [I]nstead of expanding to 20 states next year, we would reduce our presence to no more than 10 states,” Bertolini continued.

The pullout underscores the fact large corporate health providers are losing money by participating in Obamacare.

“Unless the exchanges get a rapid infusion of healthier customers who pay substantial premiums without using much care, insurers are going to keep pulling out of the areas where they are losing money. Or at the very least, they will demand benefits from the government to make it worth their while to stay,” Bloomberg reported on Tuesday.

According to a McKinsey & Company report issued in February, healthcare insurers lost money in 41 states in individual markets, including Obamacare marketplaces.

Bertolini, however, told investors in April the Obamacare mandate, which forces consumers to purchase expensive insurance or face fines imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, represents a cost-effective way to acquire new customers.

If Obamacare continues in its present form and insurance companies continue to lose money and pull out of marketplaces, the federal government will provide a huge infusion of taxpayer cash to float the system.

“While the costs of providing health care insurance are beginning to skyrocket because of Obamacare, insurance company executives are sleeping very soundly,” writes Joe Salerno of the Mises Institute. “A respected consultant to health insurance companies, Robert Laszewski, reveals that there are two obscure provisions in Obamacare that guarantee that insurance companies will be subsidized and bailed out by Amercian taxpayers. Indeed the Congressional Budget Office estimates that $1.071 trillion will be coercively transferred from taxpayers to big insurance companies over the next decade.”

In the meantime, Aetna and other insurance corporations will use the failure of Obamacare as leverage to further consolidate and monopolize the industry.

Sources

TheHuffingtonPost.com

Reuters.com

Bloomberg.com

Healthcare.McKinsey.com

Reuters.com

Mises.org