Donald Trump

Trump sends warning on possible ‘rigged’ election, after repetitive establishment attacks

Donald Trump is one of the most polarizing figures in the history of American politics.

Establishment democrats and republicans alike have been doing everything in their power to prevent him from receiving any positive recognition or attention. They clearly — occasionally admittedly — fear the man because they know that a shocking amount of American people are behind him. He could very well be the next President of the United States.

Trump supporters believe that the democrats are trying to sabotage his campaign by spreading lies and skewing polls. The Donald himself seems to agree with his fans.

During a recent speech in Columbus, Ohio, Trump stated, “I’m afraid the election is going to be rigged, I have to be honest.” Citing previous examples of democratic corruption, Trump’s comment was met with much criticism from the mainstream media, who wrote his statement off as him being a sore loser — well in advance of the election results.

Trump’s suggestion isn’t all that crazy, though. After all, it’s been completely proven that the Democratic National Committee conspired against Bernie Sanders in order to ensure a victory for Hillary Clinton. So why is the concept of them conspiring against Donald Trump — a man who isn’t even in their party — so hard to believe?

Sure, it’d be substantially more difficult to rig a presidential election than a primary, but corruption runs deep in American politics.

Should it be proven that the 2016 elections were rigged in favor of Hillary, American society could very well collapse into chaos. There would be such a powerful outrage among American citizens that the entire country could feel the devastation.

Most people know that the political game is filled with deception, but should they discover that they have been played for fools; should they discover that none of their votes mattered in the end, a legitimate revolution could begin on American soil. The people have felt like their voices don’t matter for many, many years now. If Trump is cheated out of a fair victory, that could be the final straw.

 

Sources:

Infowars.com

RealClearPolitics.com

Bill Clinton

Evil politicians are using flowery language to distract and enslave the American public

It’s an indisputable fact that a vast majority of politicians try to manipulate their country’s citizens in order to stay in office and expand their power. This has been part of the political game for so long that it’s widely accepted as fact as opposed to some unfounded conspiracy theory. We’ve seen rhetoric used effectively countless times throughout history — and it’s currently happening right under our noses.

This hasn’t been more noticeable in recent history than it was during Bill Clinton’s DNC speech, where he rambled on about his relationship with Hillary — providing an unconvincing and excruciatingly lengthy retelling of their relationship from the first time they met until his speech began. He conveniently left out all of the sex scandals, of course, and instead painted an image of true love.

Miraculously, a lot of people seemed to buy into the charade, believing the former president was being genuine. How anyone with a memory of the 1990s, or the ability to use Google, could ever believe that Bill Clinton is actually in some sort of fairy tale love story with Hillary is beyond comprehension.

Now, it’s admittedly none of the general public’s business what goes on behind closed doors in a relationship. But, since much of Hillary’s appeal is directly related to her relationship with Bill, it’s frustrating that they’re clearly lying to us. They’re using this faux marriage as a way to manipulate voters. It’s all a sham and they’re playing the American people as fools.

Should Hillary be elected into office, who knows what might come next? Her victory will open up the floodgates for all sorts of political dishonesty that will inevitably lead to further enslavement of the American people. It’s absolutely necessary for the American people to wake up and realize what these politicians are doing to us. They’re using us as pawns in their game of chess—and language is their weapon.

 

Sources:

TheGuardian.com

Breitbart.com

U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) gestures from the stage at the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver, Colorado August 26, 2008. U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) is expected to accept the Democratic presidential nomination at the convention on August 28.   REUTERS/Chris Wattie           (UNITED STATES)   US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN 2008  (USA)

When a criminal who cannot be indicted is elected to the highest office of the nation, it’s called a dictatorship

Earlier this month FBI Director James Comey, who once had a reputation for extreme fairness and was thought to be well above partisan politics, took to a podium in Washington, D.C., to tell a waiting nation something incredible: That despite all the evidence that Hillary Clinton, as secretary of state, had broken a number of federal statutes and rules governing the handling of classified materials, his agency would not recommend she be indicted by the Justice Department.

In laying out the case, Comey said:

— Scores of emails Clinton turned over contained classified information at the time they were sent or received;

— Clinton failed to turn over all her emails, as she claimed to have done, because the FBI found some of them;

— Clinton used more than one device and one server;

— Her system was not protected well or by any government software;

— It was likely that devices of associates with whom Clinton communicated had their devices hacked by foreign governments.

But despite all of that, his recommendation was not to prosecute.

“Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,” Comey said July 5.

TRANSLATION: She’s guilty but we won’t recommend prosecution.

“To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences.”

TRANSLATION: If you did this, you would be in prison.

In fact, others are in prison or where handed legal sentences for mishandling classified information.

Mind you, this was all preceded by a pair of highly unusual events:

— Attorney General Loretta Lynch just happened to be at the same Arizona airport as Bill Clinton the Saturday before Comey made his announcement, where they met in private for about 25 minutes (long enough to tell the former president why the Justice Dept. would – or, as we found out later – would not indict his wife).

— Clinton herself met on a weekend for about three hours with the FBI – highly unusual in its context and amount of time. After a year’s worth of investigation, the FBI only had about three hours’ worth of questions for Clinton? On a Saturday?

Apparently the fix was in from the outset – and Clinton herself told us so. The previous month, in an interview with Fox News, Clinton was asked by host Bret Baier if she was worried about a possible indictment. “That’s not going to happen,” she responded. “There is no basis for it, and I’m looking forward to this being wrapped up as soon as possible.”

Well, there was a basis for it – but she obviously knew more than the rest of us did as far as the final outcome was concerned, and that’s all that matters to her.

So once again, another Clinton escapes justice. Another Clinton who is running for president gets a pass for doing something that not only endangered national security, but that would have landed an ordinary American in jail for a very, very long time.

It’s hard to know exactly what the Clintons “have on everybody” in D.C., being able to slither away from obvious and serious violations of our laws. But it isn’t hard to figure out what to call a president who is far above the law: A dictator.

When the system of “justice” that is in place is so thoroughly corrupt that travesties like this can occur, we really don’t have a system anymore. We have a racket, and it’s being run by highly organized criminals posing as government officials and elected representatives.

Sources:

http://www.breitbart.com

http://biggovernment.news

https://www.fbi.gov

http://www.cnn.com

http://www.businessinsider.com

Hillary Clinton

Clinton campaign now trying to ban anti-Clinton ads on television

In the unfortunate and horrific event that Hillary Clinton is elected as the next President of the United States, there is an abundance of freedoms and liberties that the American people will have to fear her trampling all over in an attempt to push her authoritarian agendas. However, the one that has already been under attack is the freedom of speech, which the Clinton campaign targeted immediately.

According to the New York Post, the Clinton campaign has been attempting to strong-arm television networks into refusing to air a Donald Trump advertisement that “claims Clinton went to India and talked up outsourcing — and then received a donation from Indian politician Amar Singh of up to $5 million in 2008.”

The leftists claim that they want the ad taken down because it’s factually incorrect. According the Clinton gang, Singh did, in fact, donate $5 million to Hillary, but it wasn’t in 2008. Instead, the donation was given in a different year. They seem to not realize that they date isn’t the problem — it’s that the event took place in general.

While most of Trump and Clinton’s battles have been fought over Twitter, they’ve been going back and forth in television advertisements over the past few weeks. Trump, clearly recognizing the value and tenants of the First Amendment, isn’t demanding that Clinton remove her ads that attack his character. No, only Crooked Hillary demands that…

This shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, though. Hillary Clinton’s laundry list of scandals, corruption and generally horrible political history gives the likes of Trump lots of ground to cover when it comes to attack ads. If her goal is to censor and silence everyone who speaks out against her awfulness, she’s going to need a lot of help — because there are a lot of us out there.

You can watch the ad below and share it around to help expose the truth and support free speech.

 

 

Sources:

NYPost.com

IAgreeToSee.com

the clintons being sneaky

Clinton Cash film drops BOMBSHELL: Hillary arranging for U.S. uranium resources to be sold to Russia

Unbeknownst to most Americans, uranium is a strategic asset because uranium is one of the most important elements in the construction of nuclear weapons and in the production of nuclear energy.

What most Americans also don’t know is that Hillary and Bill Clinton helped arrange the transfer of one-fifth of all U.S. strategic uranium reserves to Russia, as noted in a newly-released documentary, “Clinton Cash,” based on a book of the same name by Peter Schweizer that documents all donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities.

The deal has its roots both in Hillary Clinton’s State Department and her husband’s foundation, which is now the family foundation and which will more than likely be enhanced if Hillary wins the White House in November.

As reported by The New York Times, in 2013 an article in the Kremlin-backed Russian newspaper Pravda provided details about how Russian atomic energy firm Rosatom was able to gain control of a Canadian company that had uranium mining interests that stretched from Central Asia throughout the American West. When all was said and done, the acquisition of the Canadian firm made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Russian President Vladimir Putin much closer to his overall goal of controlling the lions’s share of the world’s uranium supply.

As the Times noted, at the heart of the deal were a number of men who were the leaders of the Canadian mining industry and who also have been large donors to charitable efforts by Bill Clinton and his family. “Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would later become known as Uranium One,” the Times reported.

Here is the essence of the deal:

— Russia already controls uranium mines in Kazakhstan which are among the world’s most lucrative;

— The deal – which began in 2009 shortly after Hillary Clinton took over at the State Department and was finally completed after three phases in 2013 – gave Russia control over one-fifth of production capacity that takes place on U.S. soil;

— Uranium One’s chairman used his own family’s foundation to mask his donations – making four separate donations to the Clinton Foundation that totaled $2.35 million;

— The Clintons did not publicly disclose those donations even though Hillary Clinton signed an agreement with the Obama White House upon becoming secretary of state that she would publicly identify all donors to the foundation;

— There were others with ties to Uranium One that made donations as well.

Almost immediately after the Russians announced that they would attempt to gain a majority stake in Uranium One, Bill Clinton magically received a check for a half-a-million dollars for a speech he gave in Moscow from a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin and which was promoting Uranium One stock.

The U.S. government and Rosatom also made commitments that were supposed to ease concerns about the deal. But records show those pledges were broken repeatedly.

While the Times boldly claimed that there was no evidence of “pay for play” or quid pro quo, two things are clear: The Russians now own 20 percent of U.S. strategic uranium reserves (a key element needed for nuclear power and nuclear weapons); and both Bill and Hillary Clinton personally arranged, and were enriched by, the deal.

You can watch the entire documentary online for free here.

Sources:

NYTimes.com

BarnesAndNoble.com

YouTube.com

Hillary-Clinton

WATCH the full film: Clinton Cash reveals how Bill and Hillary schemed their way to the top

Based on the Peter Schweizer book of the same name, M.A. Taylor’s new documentary Clinton Cash looks to expose the truth behind the Clinton family’s corruption — in entertaining and informative fashion. The documentary “investigates how Bill and Hillary Clinton went from being ‘dead broke’ after leaving the White House to amassing a net worth of over $150 million, with over $2 billion in donations to their foundation.”

Now available to watch for free on YouTube, the film is being released at an incredibly important time — when it seems like a very real possibility that Crooked Hillary just might con herself into the White House this fall. Filled with substantiated facts, Clinton Cash is sure to shock up the world, should the ignorant sheep of the world choose to watch it. The livelihood of our country could depend on it.

This could be the most important documentary you see this year. View it in its entirety below.

 

 

Sources:

ZeroHedge.com

YouTube.com

Hillary Clinton

The beginning of the end: Hillary Clinton’s platform advocating for stricter surveillance state

When it comes to Crooked Hillary Clinton, there are very few instances when any of her views are even remotely understandable. Virtually everything she says is a lie. But even when you take that into account, the issues she is actually transparent and open about are all completely horrifying. When it comes to this corrupt politician, there is no winning.

One of the most appalling stances Hillary has taken is fighting hard to enact stricter surveillance measures on the American people. Under the ridiculous guise of “safety,” Clinton has openly supported the idea of infringing on individuals’ rights to privacy.

Even when Clinton was basically forced to be critical of the NSA — back in 2015, shortly after the Edward Snowden conflict — she used language and rhetoric that refused to take any side on the issue. As a result, most Americans quickly realized that she was trying to play both sides in order to protect her political standing. She would initially lean towards defending the American people’s rights, but would ultimately back the NSA and the surveillance state.

Of course, that’s exactly what happened.

It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, though. After all, she was quoted as saying, “How much is too much? And how much is not enough? That’s the hard part,” in regards to the amount of power the NSA should have. There’s no doubt that she believes that government organizations should have more control, power and resources than the country’s citizens. Politicians like Hillary believe that they own us — they believe that they’re above the law — so they continue to expand their own power by weakening ours.

This is a classic authoritarian leftist maneuver. Trying to suppress the rights of the people by pretending they’re doing it for our own good is shady and condescending. People like Clinton clearly think we’re all stupid enough to fall for this. Should she unfortunately be elected this fall, we’re all in serious danger of being spied on everywhere we go.

 

Sources:

Bitcoinist.net

TheAtlantic.com

Clinton

How many people have died under suspicious circumstances while working for the Clintons?

Controversy has surrounded the Clinton family for decades now. Whether its sex scandals, war crimes or financial shadiness, the family seems generally corrupt by all accounts.

But perhaps the eeriest realization surrounding the Clintons is the staggering amount of those who have worked closely with them dying under mysterious — even suspicious — circumstances. Much like holistic health doctors who threatened to expose Big Pharma, there are too many red flags to discredit these untimely deaths as mere coincidences.

Starting in the early 1990s, many people who could potentially unveil secrets about the family have wound up dead. From James McDougal, Hillary’s convicted partner at Whitewater, to Suzanne Coleman, the pregnant woman who was rumored to have had an affair with Bill, many people who cross the Clintons or do anything that could potentially ruin their reputations end up dying in peculiar ways.

With Hillary Clinton seeming more and more likely to be elected this November, these are the kinds of things that should be looked into. As with all conspiracies, there could be reasonable explanations for a few of these, but time and time again, those who could potentially threaten the success of the Clinton family have died in unusual fashion. Perhaps it couldn’t hurt to merely look into it.

Regardless of the outcome, there’s no denying that Hillary is dangerous. Who knows what America may look like with her as our commander-in-chief. The things she’s already done — and the things she plans to do if elected — have the potential to have devastating effects on our country. If that day unfortunately comes — and she does become the leader of the United States — the smartest thing we can do is prepare for the worst.

Given her sordid history with Bill and Hillary, if anything strange happens to Monica Lewinsky, we’ll know for sure that something terrible is going on…

 

Sources:

About.com

NaturalNews.com

Huma Abedin

Clinton’s right hand aide Huma Abedin worked on September 11th with Saudi charity suspected of funding terrorists

Like the old adage goes, if you lie with the dogs, you get up with fleas. The same applies to dirty politicians, so we can never underestimate the disgusting nature of Crooked Hillary Clinton and all of those around her.

It was recently revealed that Huma Abedin — who has been Hillary’s aide for decades — had ties to a known terrorist group on September 11th, 2001. Abedin was working for an organization that shared an office with the Muslim World League, which has been suspected of funding terrorists by the federal government. It has been rumored that the government prematurely backed off their investigation due to pressure from Saudi Arabia.

Lee Stranahan of Breitbart reports, “This latest revelation ties the Muslim World League directly to the The Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs and the Journal for Muslim Minority Affairs, an organization that Vanity Fair writer William D. Cohan called ‘the Abedin family business.'” Even if the investigation had come back without any substantial evidence, calling off the search beforehand is just dangerous. After all, similar events led us to the Orlando shooting.

This wouldn’t be the first time that government officials went out of their way to hide the truth in regards to potential Islamic terrorism. Considering the direction the world is headed, it likely won’t be the last, either. We’ve been forced to walk on eggshells in an attempt to avoid offense at all possible costs. Not hurting anyone’s feelings has become more of a priority to the federal government than preventing mass murder.

The powers that be are clearly more concerned with financial gain and maintaining power than they are with the livelihood of the American people. They’ve proven this time and time again. Things are only going to get worse and preparing for awful things to happen has become a necessary way of life.

 

Sources:

Breitbart

Natural News

Hillary Clinton

The Clinton Foundation has scored about $50 MILLION in donations from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait

For someone who rambles incessantly about the rights of women, Hillary Clinton sure does love to accept hefty donations from countries that violently oppresses members of her gender.

It has been reported by The Daily Caller that the Clinton Foundation has received between $16 million and $40 million in donations from the governments of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait — the three countries that Clinton herself demonized in a speech following the Orlando nightclub massacre.

In the speech, she stated, “For starters, it is long past time for the Saudis, the Qataris and the Kuwaitis and others to stop their citizens from funding extremist organizations.”

Well, Hillary, if you have such an issue with the way they do things in those countries, why are you so quick to accept tens of millions of dollars from their leaders? Because cold, hard cash is more important to you than integrity, it seems.

This woman is as crooked as they get. She truly lives up to the ‘Crooked Hillary’ nickname every single day of her life. One day she’s accepting copious amounts of money from the governments of Muslim countries that imprison and murder gay people, and the next she’s criticizing their policies. It’s shady, gross, and in a strange way, even disloyal. It’s everything you don’t want in a commander-in-chief, and we should be hoping and praying that she doesn’t become the next one.

So which is it, Hillary? Are you going to come out an openly denounce the manner in which women and homosexuals of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait are treated, or are you going to continue to wallow in the money the men from those countries continue to give you?

I think we already know the answer to that…

 

Sources:

The Daily Caller

FoxNews.com

Clinton.news