ArchiveArchive
958919_1_Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders in debate_standard

Six reasons why the Hillary Clinton nomination was completely rigged and illegitimate

Democrats are consoling themselves by claiming Donald Trump’s election is illegitimate, but they’ll do themselves and the nation a favor if they consider their own faults — including the top-to-bottom corruption in their own party and political strategy. (RELATED: Read more news about Hillary Clinton at Clinton.news)

(Article by John Hayward from Breitbart.com)

1. The Democrats’ rigged primary: Democrats should begin by accepting the obvious truth of a rigged primary revealed by WikiLeaks. The party’s key leaders — not the party’s voters — picked and promoted Hillary Clinton, meaning she was secretly coronated before the primary ever began. Her rival Bernie Sanders never had a chance. The “nomination” contest was theater designed to make Sanders voters accept Clinton. His voters ought to be furious at Sanders for playing along with this farce, which he most certainly did.

When Party elders shriek about nefarious Russian interference in the election process, they’re trying to distract from what the leaked DNC emails actually said, and the fact that we now know those emails are 100 percent genuine, despite early Democrat statements to the contrary. One of those shrieking claims came from Donna Brazile, who was directly involved in doctoring a primary debate by leaking questions to Clinton, not to Sanders.

2. The Democrat superdelegate system: Then there’s the openly rigged element of the Democratic primary, the superdelegate system. It is a political instrument specifically designed to shut down insurgencies and make the interests of Democrat voters secondary to the judgment of party elites, and the powerful lobbyists who manipulate them. Hillary Clinton was chosen by special-interest donors who had already spent a fortune currying favor with her, as demonstrated by the instantaneous collapse of the Clinton “charities”, the instant the Clintons had no more favors to sell.

3. The Democrat money machine: Building a titanic campaign war chest was the paramount concern of the Democrats in 2016, because they thought it — and their media allies — would give them an unbreakable headlock over the public debate. So Joe Biden was told he could not afford to get into the race. Same for Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, who barely raised enough cash to pay for a Philly cheese sandwich. Their financial kneecapping allowed Clinton to suck up hundreds of millions in campaign cash, sometimes in legally questionable ways, even as she railed against the influence of money in politics.

4. The media was part of Clinton’s campaign: It’s fun to watch Democrats wail about Russian spies using WikiLeaks to influence the election, when it’s clear the mainstream media was able to downplay the actual contents of those emails enough to keep most voters in the dark. Sure, outfits like Breitbart News did everything we could to report those revelations, but that’s nothing compared to the influence wielded by the establishment media when it gets a “narrative” avalanche rolling.

Of course the establishment media was an active participant in the rigged primary scandal. Those leaked emails from the DNC and Clinton campaign chief John Podesta reflected very, very poorly on the press. That’s something Democrats could fix – there’s no reason for illegitimate behind-the-scenes coordination between their candidates and the media.

Democrat voters also should demand an end to the incestuous relationship between the media and Democratic politics because it has become as much a liability. Sure, it’s helpful to have the media in your hip pocket, but the value of that advantage is severely degraded when the public knows about it, and has lost faith in the establishment press as a result. Worse, the media enabled a weak, out-of-touch candidates like Clinton to capture the Party nomination.

5. The law was bent and broken to keep Clinton in the game: Democrat voters also should be questioning the legitimacy of Clinton’s nomination because the rule of law was corrupted to preserve her political viability.

Her candidacy should have ended when the email server story broke. (Really, it should have ended with the publication of Clinton Cash, but the Democrats incorrectly believed their controlled media could insulate her from the fallout of those astounding revelations.)

The politicized Obama Justice Department did Democrats no favors by staving off indictments that would have taken Clinton out of the game, or by slow-walking the email investigation until her replacement became prohibitively difficult. The Obama administration perfected tactics for dragging scandal investigations out until they became “old news,” but they miscalculated and prolonged Clinton’s email scandal until it blew up like a string of demolition charges throughout the 2016 election.

Before they began howling about Russian espionage, Democrats were pushing the narrative that FBI Director James Comey sabotaged Clinton’s election hopes by speaking at length about her “extremely careless” actions when he announced no charges would be recommended, and then kneecapped her again by reviving the Clinton investigation briefly during the last days of the presidential campaign.

As with their narrative about WikiLeaks, Democrats are complaining that Clinton was “sabotaged” because people revealed the truth about her. They’re saying their presidential candidate could only win if damaging facts were concealed, false media narratives were perpetuated, and special exemptions from the law were granted to her. That sounds like the very definition of an illegitimate candidacy.

6. Democrats try to hack the electorate: We might also challenge the legitimacy of a political strategy that relies so heavily upon using immigration to hack the demographics of the American electorate. Before Clinton’s defeat shocked them into silence, liberal analysts were beginning to churn out a fresh wave of “Emerging Democratic Majority” pieces about how native-born GOP voters would never win a national election again. One of the reasons Democrats subjected the Electoral College to one of their post-election tantrums is that the EC makes it harder for them to hack the presidential vote with mass immigration. That’s the true significance of the observation that Clinton’s popular-vote “victory” came entirely from California.

Before the 2016 election went down, it was commonly observed that Republicans might have won the previous two presidential contests if they were still running with Ronald Reagan’s electorate; this observation was used to mock Trump as foolish for pursuing an obsolete electoral strategy that could never work in the new, demographically-upgraded America.

That observation also lies behind the Democrats’ decision to downplay the economic concerns of struggling Americans, and to largely ignore the distastefully un-diverse electorates of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania in favor of outreach to immigrants, racial subgroups, gays, professionals, unmarried women, and other element of the hoped-for ‘Emerging Democratic Majority.’ If Democrats didn’t believe they had a reserve army of immigrant voters for Clinton, they might have nominated Biden or Sanders to instead win ordinary Americans to their side. Amusingly, if those immigrants didn’t exist, American voters’ incomes would be higher — and fewer would have been angry enough to shift their votes to the GOP’s candidate.

To sum it all up, everything about Clinton’s nomination and campaign stinks to high heaven.

That’s why Democrats should try to reform their own corrupt party before they lose again in 2020, if only because they can’t overthrow the Constitution or persuade the military to install their next candidate. As President Barack Obama would say if the shoe was on the other foot, reform of the Democratic Party is the legitimate thing to do.

As for Republicans, they know that there are many other techniques that Democrats use to hack the electorate, including the Democrats’ control over the media and education systems. That’s why Republicans should work hard and fast to disable all of them, permanently, because they have a sworn duty to protect the legitimacy of our voting system.

Read more at: Breitbart.com

Stay informed about the Trump presidency by reading Trump.news.

Wikileaks

WikiLeaks servers under attack after latest DNC leak

Wikileaks has been the biggest enemy that the Regressive Left has had to face in 2016. Revealing the truth behind all of the lies they have attempted to spread to the American people, Wikileaks has blown the whistle on nearly everything that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has been trying to hide from the public. Because of this, it is no wonder that the authoritarian leftists are doing everything they possibly can in order to discredit the whisteblowing outlet and pretend that what they are revealing isn’t the honest truth.

Unfortunately for them, the American people are a little smarter than that, and we have all caught on to the fact that they are trying to keep us from discovering just how corrupt and twisted they are – but it’s far too late for that. The evidence has been stacking up this entire election season, and they are no longer able to pull the wool over our eyes.

But that hasn’t stopped them from trying, and it has recently been reported that WikiLeaks’ servers have been under attack since the last string of DNC email leaks – which provide plenty of unflattering realizations. While there is no evidence to confirm that the DNC or the federal government is responsible, there isn’t anyone else that has a stronger motive to take it down than them. They have everything to gain and nothing to lose at this point. All we will learn should they be found out is that they are corrupt, which is what Wikileaks has been proving all along.

Alternative news source Zero Hedge reports, “The latest leak came two days after Australian journalist and documentary maker John Pilger’s [sic] interviewed Julian Assange in what has been dubbed Assange’s most incendiary interview to date, focusing on the role of Hillary Clinton as the primary ‘cog’ in the current establishment. During the conversation, Assange talked about the leaks, saying that the source of [sic] wasn’t the Russian government, as Washington has repeatedly claimed.”

This election is bringing out the worst in people all across the world, but it is showing that the American people desire the truth now more than ever. We realize that we have been lied to so frequently and on such a large scale that we cannot continue to support the establishment politicians that have been causing us endless amounts of grief because that is the only way they can continue to expand their power.

We have to continue our fight for true freedom in this country. We have to continue to reject the status quo.

Sources:

ZeroHedge.com

RT.com

IBTimes.co.uk

julian-assange1-19-1466307461

Assange may face extradition as Ecuador considers revoking asylum

Hillary Clinton and the Democrats are working behind the scenes to have WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange not only censored but possibly ejected from the Ecuadoran embassy in London.

Ecuador granted Assange asylum in 2012, and British officials have said that they will arrest him if he leaves the embassy.

Earlier this year, an arrest warrant for Assange by a Stockholm district court was upheld. Sweden wants to question him in regard to a sex allegation. He has not been charged with a crime and does not face trial. In January, the United Nations ordered Sweden and the UK to immediately release him and compensate Assange for violating his rights.

On Monday, WikiLeaks posted the following tweet:

The DNC leak put a serious kink in Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, and resulted in the replacement of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the DNC boss.

The government of Ecuador fears a move by Britain to limit its relationship with the country in response to the DNC leak will result in a similar move by the United States and negatively impact commercial ties with the Latin American country.

The largest daily newspaper in Ecuador, El Comercio, reported on Wednesday:

It happens that the author of the mess is none other than the person to whom Ecuador has granted asylum and protection for more than four years. I was the first to say that Assange has, like all human beings, inalienable rights that must be respected. However, an asylee also has obligations can not ignore. should not “perform acts that disturb the public peace or tend to participate or influence political activities” and also must respect and not harm their acts to the country that decided asilarlo.

Unfortunately, Ecuador has not set any limit to the conduct of Assange and allowed to violate his refugee status and who seek asylum taunt. His latest interference in US policy could have consequences worldwide, of which Ecuador, Assange protector, will not leave unscathed. If London has refused to closer ties with Ecuador, because of Assange, Washington is expected to react in the same way. And the United States is our best commercial customer! I said that, once granted asylum, Ecuador is bound to keep. However, given the gruesome performances Assange undoubtedly violate his refugee status should be considered whether its conduct, taken to the extreme, it is a good reason for Ecuador to end such asylum.

In 2010, the Ecuadorian foreign ministry invited Assange to travel to Quito to discuss leaked diplomatic cables relating to Ecuador and other Latin American countries.

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa subsequently said his country had not invited Assange for a visit.

A number of US legislators called for Assange to be prosecuted after WikiLeaks published more than 250,000 diplomatic cables from US embassies around the world, described as the largest disclosure of confidential information to date.

US Rep. Peter King, a New York Republican, characterized Assange as an enemy combatant who should be apprehended and charged with espionage. He urged the government to classify WikiLeaks as a terrorist organization and freeze its assets.

The FBI is actively pursuing Assange. On 15 March, the Department of Justice filed a court document stating there is a pending national security prosecution against him and WikiLeaks. A federal warrant issued in 2012 charged Assange with “Espionage, Conspiracy to commit Espionage, Theft of Government Property, Electronic Espionage,” classified as terrorism under the Patriot Act.

Sources:

ElComercio.com

Bill Clinton

Evil politicians are using flowery language to distract and enslave the American public

It’s an indisputable fact that a vast majority of politicians try to manipulate their country’s citizens in order to stay in office and expand their power. This has been part of the political game for so long that it’s widely accepted as fact as opposed to some unfounded conspiracy theory. We’ve seen rhetoric used effectively countless times throughout history — and it’s currently happening right under our noses.

This hasn’t been more noticeable in recent history than it was during Bill Clinton’s DNC speech, where he rambled on about his relationship with Hillary — providing an unconvincing and excruciatingly lengthy retelling of their relationship from the first time they met until his speech began. He conveniently left out all of the sex scandals, of course, and instead painted an image of true love.

Miraculously, a lot of people seemed to buy into the charade, believing the former president was being genuine. How anyone with a memory of the 1990s, or the ability to use Google, could ever believe that Bill Clinton is actually in some sort of fairy tale love story with Hillary is beyond comprehension.

Now, it’s admittedly none of the general public’s business what goes on behind closed doors in a relationship. But, since much of Hillary’s appeal is directly related to her relationship with Bill, it’s frustrating that they’re clearly lying to us. They’re using this faux marriage as a way to manipulate voters. It’s all a sham and they’re playing the American people as fools.

Should Hillary be elected into office, who knows what might come next? Her victory will open up the floodgates for all sorts of political dishonesty that will inevitably lead to further enslavement of the American people. It’s absolutely necessary for the American people to wake up and realize what these politicians are doing to us. They’re using us as pawns in their game of chess—and language is their weapon.

 

Sources:

TheGuardian.com

Breitbart.com

dwassershultz

Monsanto-conspiring DNC tried luring donors with federal appointments, emails reveal

We now have hard evidence of the Democratic Party corruption that many have believed in for years.

In the recent Democratic National Committee email leaks, it was revealed that fundraisers and donors were given prioritized meetings with the federal boards and commissions. In other words, the more money you donated to the DNC — the more they would help you out financially. This is the kind of scummy, corrupt business practice that the democrats claim to be against. Yet here they are, proving themselves to be slimy hypocrites once again.

Similarly, the “tolerant” liberals showed just how intolerant they actually are by colluding to attack Bernie Sanders’ religious views. Chief Financial Officer Brad Marshall wrote in an email, “He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.”

His comments imply that people will react negatively to Bernie’s religious views — whether Jewish or atheist. For the people that have been attacking Donald Trump for being “like Hitler,” this seems a tad antisemitic and extremely hypocritical. Aren’t the democrats supposed to be the ones who are so tolerant of everyone’s religious beliefs?

Hopefully these blatantly disrespectful comments that serve as indisputable evidence of the DNC’s corruption will inspire the American people to abandon the party. It’s pretty much beyond repair at this point. Not only are they clearly in bed with the major corporations — they’re all pretending that they’re not. They’re lining their pockets in the most disgusting, hypocritical way imaginable.

We, as free Americans, must stand up for what’s right and prepare ourselves for the inevitable revolution that is brewing in this country. There’s no way that our citizens will continue to be played by these crooked politicians — led by one of the most corrupt presidential nominees in history. Anything can happen at this point and we have to be ready.

 

Sources:

DailyCaller.com

Breitbart.com