Hillary

Beyond Bengahazi: 5 forgotten scandals you need to know about Hillary Clinton

by Leave a Comment

When it comes to Hillary Clinton, the scandals are endless. Though the Benghazi conflict and the private email server are certainly at the top of everyone’s list, Clinton’s scandals are constantly piling up — even to this day.

Here are five that you should know about.

1.) Huma Abedin’s murky conflicts of interest ties

Huma Abedin, longtime aide of Hillary Clinton and longtime husband of Anthony Wiener, is a major conflict of interest. A devout Muslim, Abedin’s ties to a Saudi Arabian “charity” that was actually funding terror attacks is well documented and shouldn’t be ignored. For Hillary to be working so closely with someone who clearly has a stronger allegiance to her religion than her country sets off a number of red flags.

2.) Sidney Blumenthal — the aide she never should have trusted

A top aide during Bill Clinton’s presidency, Sidney Blumenthal has had ties to the Clinton family for decades. Unfortunately for him, he seems to be incorrect about a stunning amount of political theories. Clinton still seems to trust him, though, which has potentially led to her making a series of boneheaded decisions. In regards to the safety of our country, that is incredibly dangerous.

3.) Expensive speeches — bought-out morality

The Clintons are notoriously expensive when it comes to booking them to give speeches — so much so that it became a major talking point for Bernie Sanders while campaigning against Hillary. Her attempts to seem relatable to the working class are doomed to fail when she’s making hundreds of thousands of dollars to give legendarily brief speeches.

4.) The Clinton Foundation scam

Constantly viewed as a complete and utter scam by anyone who even attempts to analyze it, the Clinton Foundation has been the subject of controversy for years now. The completely undeniable conflicts of interest and the belief that the foundation was actually funding big businesses have left many people feeling turned off by the organization.

5.) The Whitewater scandal

This is where most of the controversies began. The Whitewater Development Corporation controversy dates back to the late 1970s when Bill and Hillary entered into a failed real estate venture with Jim and Susan McDougal. A series of FBI investigations followed in search of criminal misconduct due to many investors losing money on the deal. While neither Bill nor Hillary were formally convicted of any wrongdoing, Whitewater is still a controversial subject.

 

Sources:

TheAtlantic.com

Breitbart.com

Hillary Clinton

Newest poll from Texas: 3 out of 5 support state secession if Hillary elected

by Leave a Comment

For the most part, Texans have been on the #NeverHillary train since its inception. There’s just something about the freedom-loving nature of Texas that completely clashes with Hillary’s big government ideology.

For years, the Texas Nationalist Movement has been urging for the state to secede from the United States of America. Should Hillary win, polls show that a majority of Texans who are currently supporting Republican nominee Donald Trump will jump on board with that idea.

New poll results released by Public Policy Polling show that three out of five Trump-supporting Texas residents (a stunning 60%) would be in favor of secession if Hillary is elected this November. They simply don’t feel safe with her in charge of our country — and for good reason.

Hillary has proven during her time in office that she’s a legitimate problem. From completely mishandling the private email server situation to letting American soldiers die in Benghazi to the whole fiasco with the Democratic National Committee, Clinton is the last person you want as the leader of the Free World. She’s truly awful.

It says something about Hillary that she is so terrible that entire states will want to leave the country if she is elected. We’re not talking about a few dozen extremists here, we’re talking about hundreds of thousands of people. She is so untrustworthy and incompetent that millions of people across the United States don’t want her to be elected. That’s quite a statement.

Perhaps the saddest thing about all of this is that, to many, Texas represents everything that we love about America. Tough people, hard work, and individual liberties are a part of the religion down in the Lone Star State. For our nation to fall so far from grace that Texans want to leave for good is deeply upsetting — but it’s also understandable.

So where do you stand? Would you support secession if Hillary becomes the President of the United States?

 

Sources:

Chron.com

TheHill.com

trumpclinton-1466840998

Trump fights back against establishment media campaign to discredit him

by Leave a Comment

On Monday, presidential candidate Donald Trump led a foray against the establishment media.

In addition to a flurry of tweets, Trump sent out a Mainstream Media Accountability Survey via email. “We are running against the very dishonest and totally biased media!” the email reads. “It’s time to hold the media accountable for trying to rig this election against us.”

Trump’s recent criticism of the establishment media follows a story The New York Times published about the alleged secret work that Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, had done for Viktor F. Yanukovych, the elected leader of Ukraine who was deposed during a State Department engineered coup.

“One again The New York Times has chosen to purposefully ignore facts and professional journalism to fit their political agenda, choosing to attack my character and reputation rather than present an honest report,” Manafort said in a statement, adding that the accusation that he “accepted cash payments is unfounded, silly and nonsensical.”

“I have never received a single ‘off-the-books cash payment’ as falsely ‘reported’ by The New York Times, nor have I ever done work for the governments of Ukraine or Russia,” he insisted.

Manafort then excoriated The Times for ignoring the corruption of Hillary Clinton. “The Times does fail to disclose the fact that the Clinton Foundation has taken (and may still take) payments in exchange for favors from Hillary Clinton while serving as Secretary of State,” he said.

“This is not discussed despite the overwhelming evidence in emails that Hillary Clinton attempted to cover up.”

The reason the establishment media does not cover the Clinton Foundation scandal is obvious: NBC Universal, News Corporation, Turner Broadcasting and Thomson Reuters are among more than a dozen media organizations that have made contributions to the foundation.

“The list also includes mass media groups like Comcast, Time Warner and Viacom, as well a few notable individuals, including Carlos Slim, the Mexican telecom magnate and largest shareholder of The New York Times Company, and James Murdoch, the chief operating officer of 21st Century Fox. Both Slim and Murdoch have given between $1 million to $5 million, respectively,” writes Josh Gerstein for Politico.

The donations span the supposed political divide, and include Newsmax, Google, Bloomberg Philanthropies, Mort Zuckerman, George Stephanopoulos and others.

Trump’s strategic attack arrives at a time when public attitudes toward the establishment media are at a historical low.

“Over the last two decades, research shows the public has grown increasingly skeptical of the news industry,” a report from the American Press Institute released in April reads. “The study reaffirms that consumers do value broad concepts of trust like fairness, balance, accuracy, and completeness. At least two-thirds of Americans cite each of these four general principles as very important to them.”

Even journalists believe that the establishment media is not only biased, but corrupt. “There is unprecedented, I believe, influence on the media, not just the news, but the images you see everywhere. By well-orchestrated and financed campaign of special interests, political interests and corporations. I think all of that comes into play,” a CBS reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, told Fox News host Bill O’Reilly.

“Broadly there are overarching concerns about, I would say just fear over original investigative reporting,” she added.

According to a report by the Associated Press, Democrats are more likely to believe establishment media news stories than are Republicans and independents.

“Just 6 percent of people say they have a lot of confidence in the media, putting the news industry about equal to Congress and well below the public’s view of other institutions. In this presidential campaign year, Democrats were more likely to trust the news media than Republicans or independents.”

Donald Trump’s latest effort to fight back against negative propaganda aimed at his presidential bid appears to be well-timed and executed, especially following the outrageous charge by the media that he encouraged gun owners and supporters of the Second Amendment to assassinate Hillary Clinton.

Sources include:

NYTimes.com

TheHill.com

Politico.com

AmericanPressInstitute.org

TruthRevolt.org

BigStory.AP.org

Breitbart.com

Editorial-Use-Donald-Trump-Podium-Smile

Liberal Tech Companies Team Up to Defeat Trump

by Leave a Comment

Now that the primaries are history and the election is right around the corner, the effort to take down Donald Trump and ensure Hillary’s coronation has shifted into high gear.

Liz Crokin writing for Observer Politics reports:

The usual suspects from left-leaning major media outlets like The New York Times, MSNBC, CNN and even entertainment networks are doing everything in their power to ensure a Clinton victory. Look no further than to Wolf Blitzer mincing around and drinking wine at the Democratic convention, celebrating Hillary’s nomination. But the propaganda skewing this election runs much deeper than just the media: our iPhones, iPads, social media networks, Google and even video games are all in the tank for Hillary Clinton—and it’s chilling.

Crokin explains how Trump media is rejected or stigmatized as “explicit” while left-leaning podcasts are allowed to dominate. “Of all the channels listed in the Apple News politics section, only two of the 16 arguably lean right—the rest are reliably left-wing,” she writes.

This should not come as a surprise: Apple CEO Tim Cook is an avid Clinton supporter. Team Clinton hired Google’s Eric Schmidt to kickstart a company providing consulting services for the candidate.

“While Schmidt has said that he would not work in a Clinton administration, he does support her presidential campaign. Google also has a number of close ties to the Obama administration, with a number of former employees serving in top positions, from U.S. Chief Technology Officer Megan Smith to the head of the U.S. Patent Office, Michelle Lee. The chief technology officer of Clinton’s campaign, Stephanie Hannon, was also hired from Google,” writes Alexander Howard for The Huffington Post.

Google also stands accused of rigging search criteria to show Clinton in a favorable light.

“Twitter is another culprit,” notes Crokin. “The company has gotten a lot of slack for banning conservatives and Trump supporters such as Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos and, most recently, rapper Azealia Banks after she came out in support of Trump. Twitter has provided vague answers as to why conservative voices have been banned while they’ve allowed other users to call for the killing of cops.”

On Thursday it was revealed Twitter CEO Dick Costolo “secretly ordered employees to filter out abusive and hateful replies to President Barack Obama during a Q&A session,” according to BuzzFeed.

Moreover, founders of popular pro-Trump Twitter handles accuse the corporation of censoring their content.

Instagram pulls down accounts criticizing Clinton. “In June, a conservative comedy group called Toughen Up America was banned with no warning or explanation. Last week, the popular Australian-based graffiti artist, Lushsux, was banned from Instagram after he posted photos of a bikini-clad Clinton mural he painted.”

Facebook faced criticism after Sen. John Thune sent a letter to CEO Mark Zuckerberg asking him to explain why conservative posts were taken down while those for Black Lives Matter promoted.

Facebook is said to be a product of the CIA’s tech investment operation, In-Q-Tel.

“The publicly available record on the Facebook/In-Q-Tel connection is tenuous,” writes The Corbett Report. “Facebook received $12.7 million in venture capital from Accel, whose manager, James Breyer, now sits on their board. He was formerly the chairman of the National Venture Capital Association, whose board included Gilman Louie, then the CEO of In-Q-Tel. The connection is indirect, but the suggestion of CIA involvement with Facebook, however tangential, is disturbing in the light of Facebook’s history of violating the privacy of its users.

Google’s connection to In-Q-Tel is more straightforward, if officially denied. In 2006, ex-CIA officer Robert David Steele told Homeland Security Today that Google “has been taking money and direction for elements of the US Intelligence Community, including the Office of Research and Development at the Central Intelligence Agency, In-Q-Tel, and in all probability, both the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Army’s Intelligence and Security Command.” Later that year, a blogger claimed that an official Google spokesman had denied the claims, but no official press statement was released.

Hillary Clinton is the obvious choice for the establishment, its national security state, the military industrial complex, and the surveillance apparatus that relies on tech companies, especially Facebook.

Sources:

Observer.com
HuffingtonPost.com
BuzzFeed.com
CorbettReport.com

Anderson Cooper CNN

Is it time to call for the arrest of CNN propaganda producers for their full scale attack on democracy?

by Leave a Comment

Sometimes the First Amendment goes too far and allows the “wrong” kind of speech — or at least, that’s what the political Left in America wants you to believe. Whether on a college campus or a rally for GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump, the Left is always screaming for “limits” on certain kinds of speech – that is, speech that the purveyors of Left-wing political correctness have deemed “offensive.”

Maybe it’s time for Americans who are sick of being bullied into silence to turn the tables on these intolerant speech cops. Maybe it’s time to demand that the media be held liable not for reporting but for being little more than a propaganda machine for the Democratic Party.

Of course we’re not actually calling for limits on the First Amendment; the Left does that. But holding the media’s feet to the fire is certainly something more Americans ought to do. And in fact, millions are already fighting back.

Case in point: CNN, a supposedly “unbiased” news network which is going full-out for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. At a recent Trump campaign event in Kissimmee, Florida, CNN producer Noah Gray was confronted by Trump supporters angry about the network’s bias against their candidate. One older gentleman who would only say “I’m a Patriot” when asked his name, flipped Gray the bird, calling him a “traitor” to the country.

But is it fair to say that CNN really is in the tank for Clinton? Sure it is – especially when one of the network’s own hosts admits it.

As reported by BizPac Review, Chris Cuomo – the guy who called Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort a liar and stayed on-air for 32 minutes without a commercial break to debate a ridiculous liberal interpretation of Trump’s recent Second Amendment statement – and another hostess discussed Clinton’s possible entrance into the race in 2014.

“It’s a problem because she’s doing what they call in politics ‘freezing pockets,’ because the donors are giving her money thinking she’s going to run, that means they’re not going to have available money for other candidates if she doesn’t.” Cuomo said. “And I don’t think she’s going to give it to them. We couldn’t help her any more than we have, she’s got just a free ride so far from the media, we’re the biggest ones promoting her campaign, so it had better happen.”

It doesn’t get any clearer than that. “The media” – meaning the legacy media combined with the bulk of Left-wing new media – are completely dedicated to ensuring another Clinton presidency.

That’s not “journalism,” that is activism disguised as journalism, meaning it’s propaganda.

But is it criminal? Some on the Left think so. Consider what leftist attorneys general from a handful of blue states want to do to oil companies who they say are “climate change deniers” – they want to bring criminal charges against them, in an effort to shut them up (because the Left cannot prove – and will never be able to prove – that fossil fuels are causing global warming/climate change). And, of course, they are aided and abetted by the very same media that is all for Hillary Clinton.

Wait – maybe it is time to arrest the propagandist “news” media.

Sources for this story include:

Freedom.news

BizPacReview.com

DailySignal.com

Bill-Hillary-Clinton-725x375

Hillary Clinton’s link to terrorism: WikiLeaks CONFIRMS arms deal made with ISIS

by Leave a Comment

In the 1980s during the Reagan administration, various officials within the government and national security structure set up an operation whereby the United States would sell arms to the government of Iran in exchange for the release of some U.S. hostages. Following the sale, the money was then transferred to Contra rebels who were fighting the communist-dominated government of Nicaragua.

There was one major problem with the operation, however: Every phase of it was illegal. U.S. statutes forbade the sale of weapons to Iran, an enemy even back then, and Congress had barred the administration from providing any funding and support to the Contra rebels.

It seems that, in the 2000s, little has changed except the names of the major players. Enter then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

According to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, his organization has obtained a trove of Clinton’s emails that indicate she was at the center of a weapons transfer operation in which many of them wound up in the hands of the Islamic State, otherwise known as ISIS.

As reported by Democracy Now, in March WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for more than 30,000 emails and attachments that were sent to and from Clinton’s private email servers that she set up and used while at the head of the State Department.

The operation managed to retrieve roughly 50,000 pages of documents that span from June 2010 to August 2014. Of those, 7,500 documents were sent by Clinton. The State Department had released the emails as part of a Freedom of Information Act request.

In an interview, Assange – who described WikiLeaks as a “rebel library of Alexandria,” said that Clinton’s emails were mated with diplomatic cables with other Clinton materials he has already published on the site, “creating a rich picture” of how the Democratic presidential nominee functions in office.

More broadly, Assange said, the emails and other documents provide insight into how the State Department in general operates.

“So, for example,” he said, “the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails.

“There’s more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone,” Assange added.

What he’s saying is this: The Obama administration, via Clinton’s State Department, supplied weapons to the world’s foremost terrorist power, and Clinton’s emails prove it.

Assange is, in effect, confirming what the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi has said: That the Clinton-led policy in Libya during the so-called “Arab Spring” ultimately allowed U.S. weapons to flow into the hands of not only ISIS but also elements of Al Qaeda in Syria.

Former CIA operative Clare Lopez, who was a co-author of the report, also noted that scores of other operatives were involved in a sort of gun-running scheme, and that a group of lawmakers known as the “Gang of Eight,” at a minimum, were aware of the operation.

The evidence is clear that Clinton not only made the wrong decisions regarding U.S. policy in Libya and Syria, but that her actions led to the arming, aiding and abetting of an enemy.

One other recent development that seems to indicate Clinton is with the terrorists, not Americans. During a campaign speech in Orlando, Fla., this week, Seddique Mateen, father of the Orlando shooter, was seen sitting in the crowd behind her, cheering her on.

To date, Clinton has not disavowed Mateen or what his son did. And for the record, Mateen supports the Afghan Taliban.

Sources for this story include:

Breitbart.com

AIM.org  [PDF]

DemocracyNow.org

TownHall.com

DailyCaller.com

Breitbart.com

George Soros

George Soros confirmed through email leaks as Clinton’s puppet master while she was Sec. of State

by Leave a Comment

For many years now, many political pundits have suspected that, when it comes to foreign policy, billionaire businessman George Soros has been pulling the strings behind the scenes.

Despite being attacked by the lie-spewing mainstream media, new evidence proves that those people have been right all along.

Recently, groups run by Soros were hacked by DCLeaks — who released thousands of documents online. As always seems to be the case with these political email leaks, the content reveals all sorts of political collusion. No matter how hard the global elite try to keep it hidden, the truth always comes out in the end.

The leak reveals that Soros was the puppet master behind Hillary Clinton’s decisions as Secretary of State.

One of the emails, dated January 24, 2011, reads:

Dear Hillary,

A serious situation has arisen in Albania which needs urgent attention at senior levels of the US government. You may know that an opposition demonstration in Tirana on Friday resulted in the deaths of three people and the destruction of property. There are serious concerns about further unrest connected to a counter-demonstration to be organized by the governing party on Wednesday and a follow-up event by the opposition two days later to memorialize the victims. The prospect of tens of thousands of people entering the streets in an already inflamed political environment bodes ill for the return of public order and the country’s fragile democratic process.

I believe two things need to be done urgently:

1. Bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha and opposition leader Edi Rama to forestall further public demonstrations and to tone down public pronouncements.

2. Appoint a senior European official as a mediator.

While I am concerned about the rhetoric being used by both sides, I am particularly worried about the actions of the Prime Minister. There is videotape of National Guard members firing on demonstrators from the roof of the Prime Ministry. The Prosecutor (appointed by the Democratic Party) has issued arrest warrants for the individuals in question. The Prime Minister had previously accused the opposition of intentionally murdering these activists as a provocation. After the tape came out deputies from his party accused the Prosecutor of planning a coup d’etat in collaboration with the opposition, a charge Mr. Berisha repeated today. No arrests have been made as of this writing.

The demonstration resulted from opposition protests over the conduct of parliamentary elections in 2009. The political environment has deteriorated ever since and is now approaching levels of 1997, when similar issues caused the country to slide into anarchy and violence. There are signs that Edi Rama’s control of his own people is slipping, which may lead to further violence.

The US and the EU must work in complete harmony over this, but given Albania’s European aspirations the EU must take the lead. That is why I suggest appointing a mediator such as Carl Bildt, Martti Ahtisaari or Miroslav Lajcak, all of whom have strong connections to the Balkans.

My foundation in Tirana is monitoring the situation closely and can provide independent analysis of the crisis.

Thank you,

George Soros

Shortly after the email was sent, Hillary followed orders. Soros had successfully convinced her to fulfill his demands.

The theory that Hillary knows nothing about foreign policy and has merely been Soros’ puppet the entire time is heavily backed up by this email. Soros is essentially telling her exactly how to do her job — and considering he’s a businessman with a lot to gain from her decisions, this is quite alarming.

The leaks serve as further proof that American politicians are owned by corporations and fueled by the almighty dollar.

These email leaks continue to prove that skeptics and alternative media outlets aren’t the insane conspiracy theorists that they are often portrayed as being. These days, they seem to know the truth for weeks, months and even years before it’s revealed by the mainstream media.

We, as American citizens, deserve to know who is really pulling the strings behind all of the political decisions being made by our government. Why bother electing officials if they’re only going to make decisions that their handlers ask them to? At what point will we finally reach our breaking point?

It feels like the timer is ticking down…

 

Sources:

Breitbart.com

DailyCaller.com

victor-thorn

Investigative anti-Clinton critic the latest to turn up dead in recent weeks

by Leave a Comment

Add another “mysterious death” to the Clinton body count.

A contributing reporter to the American Free Press, Victor Thorn, 54, has turned up dead from what police say was a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Thorn’s claim to fame, so to speak, is that he was a long-time researcher and critic of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

An author of more than 20 books, Thorn was known best for the Clinton trilogy, “three definitive works that delved into the history of the power couple, including their sordid scandals, Bill Clinton’s sexual assaults of multiple women, and the drug-running out of Mena, Arkansas, while Clinton was governor of the state.” The Political Insider reports.

Upon receiving news of Thorn’s demise, the American Free Press contacted the State College, Pa., police department for news related to his death; Thorn was born Scott Robert Makufka. But police weren’t able to provide any details, and it was unclear how the determination that the gunshot would was self-inflicted was made.

Thorn’s latest book is titled, “CROWNING CLINTON: Why Hillary Shouldn’t Be in the White House.” It has been described as a major indictment of Hillary Clinton’s alleged criminal behavior.

According to a description of the book, it provides readers with a wealth of information that the mainstream media only recently discovered and reported – some outlets, anyway. In addition, there are more than 50 one-on-one interviews with a number of experts on government and policy to provide a multitude of evidence as to why Clinton is unsuited for the White House and why the country should never let Bill Clinton anywhere near it.

Some of the details provided by Thorn in the book involves “the real truth” about Benghazi, specifically implicating Hillary Clinton; her cover-ups of her husband’s serial sexual dalliances and assaults against some of his victims; what really happened regarding her use of multiple private email servers and devices while serving as Obama’s secretary of state; shady business arrangements and dealings of late, involving allegations of money laundering; and more.

“At a time when this nation’s future hangs on a delicate thread, every argument must be made to prevent Bill and Hillary from inflicting any further damage on the nation. Crowning Clinton arrives at precisely the right time,” says the book description.

The death of Thorn is just the latest one in a series of freak deaths that don’t make a lot of sense when you delve into the circumstances:

— In early July, former president of the UN General Assembly, John Ashe, died just days before he was to testify against the Clintons and the Democratic Party. According to the official story, Ashe “accidentally” crushed his own throat in a workout-related incident. But that was after the New York Post‘s Page Six reported that he had died from a heart attack. Ashe was to testify with his businessman co-defendant Ng Lap Seng, a Chinese national who funneled $1 billion to Ashe – and several hundred thousand dollars, illegally, to the Democratic National Committee during Bill Clinton’s tenure.

— Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich was shot and killed as he walked in his neighborhood in Washington, D.C., on July 10. He was shot in the back; police are investigating the crime as an attempted robbery but the shooter did not take his wallet or anything else of value. Rich was a data analyst who some believe leaked thousands of damaging emails from the DNC to WikiLeaks. Also, there is another connection to the Clinton Global Initiative involving corruption, which you can read here.

Sources for this story include:

Trump.news

ThePoliticalInsider.com

AmericanFreePress.net

TheGatewayPundit.com

ZeroHedge.com

Editorial-Use-Donald-Trump-Ivanka

Junk food-damaged Michael Moore calls for Ivanka Trump to convince her dad to step down

by Leave a Comment

Filmmaker Michael Moore has told Ivanka Trump her father needs to end his presidential campaign.

The Oscar-winning director made news in December when he stood outside the Trump Tower in New York with a placard proclaiming “We are all Muslim.” Moore also penned an open letter at the time.

“Fortunately, Donald, you and your supporters no longer look like what America actually is today,” Moore wrote. “We are not a country of angry white guys. Here’s a statistic that is going to make your hair spin: Eighty-one percent of the electorate who will pick the president next year are either female, people of color, or young people between the ages of 18 and 35. In other words, not you. And not the people who want you leading their country.”

In yet another open letter posted on August 10 on the liberal Alternet website, Moore tells Trump’s daughter she must convince him to shut down his campaign.

“I’m writing to you because your dad is not well,” Moore begins. “Every day he continues his spiral downward—and after his call for gun owners to commit acts of violence against Mrs. Clinton, it is clear he needs help, serious help. His comments and behavior have become more and more bizarre and detached from reality. He is in need of an intervention. And I believe only you can conduct it.”

Trump’s supposed call for gun owners to murder Clinton is a classic case of the establishment media taking comments out of context for the sake of political gain. After the Clinton campaign distorted the statement and the Secret Service talked with Trump about the remark in support of the Second Amendment, Donald Trump posted a tweet and his campaign issued a formal statement.

“It’s called the power of unification—2nd Amendment people have amazing spirit and are tremendously unified, which gives them great political power,” Jason Miller, a Trump aide, said in the statement.

“And this year, they will be voting in record numbers, and it won’t be for Hillary Clinton, it will be for Donald Trump.”

It should come as no surprise Moore would disingenuously attack Trump on the Second Amendment. He established himself as a leader of the anti-Second Amendment movement when he released his 2002 film Bowling for Columbine. In the film, he verbally attacked the late actor and president of the National Rifle Association, Charlton Heston.

In the open letter Moore provides Ivanka with a script she can recite to convince her father to step aside and seek psychiatric help. It is peppered with the sarcastic remarks Moore is known for.

“Ivanka, I have faith in you that you can do this,” Moore concludes. “I know I’ve called your dad crazy before, but I was speaking politically, not clinically. This has gone beyond crazy. The entire nation—in fact, the entire world—needs you to step forward and do the courageous thing history will praise you for: the loving act of a brilliant daughter who also loved her beleaguered country enough to say her father wasn’t well and needed help.”

Moore has not posted an open letter to Hillary Clinton despite her documented health issues and anger management problem, the latter demonstrated when she testified before Congress on Benghazi.

In 2008 Moore told Larry King he was “morally prohibited from voting for Hillary in the primaries because of her war votes, I mean that not as a personal attack against her, but I simply can’t side with somebody who participated, whether willingly or unknowingly, as she claims, in something that has been so evil.”

Despite this aversion to Clinton, in January Moore admitted a “forbidden love” for the former secretary of state. After fawning over Bernie Sanders, Moore told Chris Hayes of MSNBC although “I have obviously many disagreements with Hillary about her vote on the war and her relationship with Wall Street, whatever,” he has “always really liked her, and not just in a—in a forbidden way.”

Moore further admitted his admiration for the Clintons. “Obviously, my politics line up very closely with Bernie’s. But we have a historic moment where we could elect the first woman president of the United States. And you know, I got invited to the White House by the Clintons back in the day. And they were really nice to me. And I got to eat whatever I wanted to eat. It was all very friendly… We were going through the reception line. And Bill goes ‘I’m your number one fan.’ She grabbed his hand and goes ‘No, I’m your number one fan.’ They’re great.”

Moore expressed his admiration years after Bill Clinton demonstrated his capacity as a warmonger, illegally bombing Yugoslavia, a medical facility in Sudan, and launching cruise missiles into Baghdad, killing a number of civilians, including the renowned artist Layla al-Attar. Moore has not spoken a word about Bill Clinton’s murderous sanctions that ultimately killed 500,000 Iraqi children.

Michael Moore is a throughly modern Democrat. He champions social issues, attacks the cornerstone of the Constitution, and downplays the war crimes of the Clintons and Obama.

Moore may consider Donald Trump insane. However, the billionaire presidential candidate had nothing to do with killing 30,000 Libyans, the US policy in Syria responsible for the murder of 500,000 Syrians, and orchestrating a coup in Honduras.

An intervention is required in the case of Hillary Clinton.

Hopefully, the American people will do it in November.

MichaelMoore.com

Alternet.org

TheHill.com

TheHuffingtonPost.com

Mediaite.com

NYTimes.com

FPIF.org

CounterPunch.org

Hillary Clinton

Hillary is the candidate of treason: Ties to Russia, Qatar, and Libya revealed

by Leave a Comment

There isn’t much about Hillary Clinton that isn’t tainted, co-opted or politically compromised. Indeed, she may well be the most corrupt presidential candidate in the history of our country.

One of her campaign’s main arguments to voters is that she is imminently more qualified that GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump because of her vast experience as a first lady, a U.S. senator and, most recently, as the Obama administration’s secretary of state.

What she appears to have the most experience in is feathering her own next and helping our enemies gain strategic advantages over us.

First, the Libyan connection.

As reported former judge and Fox News contributor Andrew Napolitano, the Democratic nominee for president has a lot to answer for over her role as facilitator arms to Libyan jihadists.

“To pursue her goal of a ‘democratic’ government there, Clinton, along with Obama and a dozen or so members of Congress from both houses and both political parties, decided she should break the law by permitting U.S. arms dealers to violate the U.N. arms embargo and arm Libyan rebels whom she hoped would one day run the new government,” Napolitano wrote. “So she exercised her authority as secretary of state to authorize the shipment of American-made arms to Qatar, a country beholden to the Muslim Brotherhood and friendly to the Libyan rebels and a country the U.S. had no business arming—unless the purpose of doing so was for the arms to be transferred to the rebels.”

There is evidence to suggest Napolitano’s assertions are true. Memos that were uncovered from the burned American compound in Benghazi and obtained by the Washington Times reveal that U.S. diplomats there were tracking a number of potential U.S.-sanctioned weapons shipments that were ostensibly aimed at arming allies. But at least one of those shipments were sent to the Transitional National Council, a Libyan rebel movement that sought to overthrow leader Moamar Gadafi. And while that shipment appears to have been canceled, a career CIA officer, David Manners, told Fox News in 2015 that the shipment of thousands of rocket launchers and machine guns, as well as millions of rounds of ammunition, did eventually make it to the council – despite a ban on shipping weapons to Libya at the time.

In testimony before the House Select Committee on Benghazi Oct. 22, 2015, Clinton [allegedly] lied under oath and said no such shipments took place.

Next, Clinton – as secretary of state – was also duplicitous in allowing Russia to gain control of one-fifth of all U.S. uranium supplies, a mineral of such strategic importance because of its use in nuclear energy and nuclear weapons. As reported by The New York Times and revealed in the recently released documentary, “Clinton Cash,” both Hillary and Bill Clinton were complicit. For both, their complicity began in 2009, shortly after Hillary took over the State Department.

At the center of the deal are a number of men who are leaders of the Canadian mining industry, all of whom have been major donors to the Clinton Foundation and its various charities. The group’s members built, financed and eventually sold to the Russians a company called Uranium One.

Because uranium is such a strategic asset, the deal had to be approved by a committee comprised of representatives from several U.S. government agencies. Among those that eventually green-lighted the sale was Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

As the Russians gained control of Uranium one in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, according to Canadian records, cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation – to the tune of $2.35 million, donations that were not public disclosed by the Clintons, though Hillary had struck a deal with the White House to make sure all donors were made public.

Shortly after the Russians announced they wanted to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Bill Clinton received a $500,000 check to give a speech in Moscow from a Russian investment bank with links to the government, which was also promoting Uranium One stock.

Promises made to ensure to ease concerns over the deal were repeatedly broken, the Times reported.

Sources:

FrontPageMag.com

FoxBusiness.com

WashingtonTimes.com

FoxNews.com

NYTimes.com