ArchiveArchive

How 4chan trolled the CIA, CNN and BuzzFeed with hilarious fantasy that got reported as real news (infographic)

January 11, 2017 by Mike Adams Leave a Comment

(See INFOGRAPHIC below) From NaturalNews.com:

CNN and BuzzFeed just hit a whole new low as the world’s dirtiest “sleaze journalism” rags after being caught publishing erotic fanfiction fantasies as “CIA intelligence facts” to attack Donald Trump.

The revelations are astonishing and deeply damning to CNN and BuzzFeed, both of which utterly abandoned the most basic journalistic ethics in their rush to publish anything — including completely fabricated “fake news” — that might damage Donald Trump.

The allegations — which included bizarre, twisted fetish fantasies — were so obviously false and unsubstantiated that most news organizations refused to publish them. But CNN and BuzzFeed have abandoned any attachment to journalistic credibility and have demonstrated a shocking willingness to run with any and all news that they think might spread false rumors to damage the reputation of Donald Trump and his administration.

Here’s an infographic that pieces together what we know so far. What’s hilariously emerging from all this is how Arizona Sen. John McCain is such a laughable tool of disinfo and propaganda. Come to think of it, so is the CIA at this point…

Share this infographic widely. As this story is still developing, there may be more added to it over time, so check back:

Comey’s FBI ‘clearing’ of Hillary Clinton may seal Donald Trump’s victory

November 6, 2016 by Robert Willis Leave a Comment

Many Americans have long believed that the Clintons are a criminal family that regularly breaks the law without having to answer to anyone for their crimes.

The Clintons have been accused of misconduct for decades, from Hillary’s firing during the Watergate investigation, to Bill Clinton’s various sex scandals — the most famous being with Monica Lewinsky.

The Clinton’s have had countless scandals and Americans are sick of them

Although the Lewinsky scandal would eventually lead to Bill Clinton’s impeachment as President, the Clinton family’s reputation appears to be made of steel; the impeachment clearly had little affect on the Clintons’ popularity with Democrats. This can be seen shortly after the Clintons’ left the White House, when Hillary was elected to the Senate in New York.

It would be hard to think of another family that has been able to get away with so many documented corrupt activities seemingly unscathed.

The surprising thing to many Americans (especially Republicans) has been their ability to dodge any sort of consequence for their actions; there is no doubt that they are held to a different standard, even to the point of being “protected” by authorities. Many average citizens have struggled to understand how the Clintons’ are able to get away with their constant scandals. Will they ever be held accountable? Isn’t everyone equal under the law?

Although equality has been a term touted by Hillary Clinton for many years, she makes it clear that elites like her and her husband have special privileges.

Voters are sick of the political establishment in the United States. They are sick of having their intelligence insulted when blatant lies are told to them. This is the internet age and the Clinton’s are having a hard time keeping their crimes (and lies) silent — especially with Wikileaks dumping Clinton campaign chair John Podesta’s emails that outline corruption. The mainstream media will not report on real “news,” but we now have the new media that is doing the job for many of these compromised news agencies.

Through whistle blowers, the public has learned that the Clintons do not have the people of the United States’ best interests in mind. From selling uranium to the Russians, to pay-to-play schemes while Hillary was Secretary of State, there seems to be no line that they won’t cross.

Citizens now realize they can only fix their country by voting Trump

Hillary Clinton setup an illegal email server and sent classified information using it. She even lied to Congress about them, yet the FBI decided that they would not bring charges against her. This infuriated the American people — many ex-officials have been prosecuted for much less.

When FBI director James Comey sent a letter to Congress 11 days before the election to inform them that the FBI was investigating Clinton’s email case again, the American people finally felt their voices were being heard. They had possibly found sensitive information with links to Hillary’s email on a laptop that was taken from Anthony Weiner, a disgraced ex-politician who was caught sexting an underage girl. Was this going to be the end to Hillary’s corruption?

Now — just 2 days before the election — Comey has come forward to say that Hillary Clinton has been cleared by the FBI. They will not seek charges against her.

It is now clear that the only way to stop Hillary Clinton is to make sure she doesn’t win the presidency. Not only would it be the end of America, but it may be the end of the world. The only way to do this is to make sure Donald Trump wins the election. It is hard to think of a more powerful motivator to get out and vote not just for Trump, but against someone who has done so much to harm the United States.

Sources:

DailyMail.co.uk

FoxNews.com

FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton so dirty agents are ready to revolt

October 12, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

As expected, there is no shortage of FBI agents who are upset about the way their boss handled the bureau’s year-long probe into Hillary Clinton’s compromise of top secret materials via her private email server.

In a word, many are angry that Director James Comey not only let her off the hook, but altered the conditions and parameters of the investigation in such a way there was never going to be a serious examination of all the facts. And, hence, no recommendation for prosecution.

As noted by veteran investigative reporter Paul Sperry, writing at the New York Post, agents in general are “ready to revolt” following the pseudo-probe. He notes that veteran agents are blaming Comey for permanently damaging the FBI’s once-established reputation as a non-partisan law enforcement entity that rarely compromised investigations, especially over politics.

In response to congressional critics, Comey said last week that the case was handled by career FBI agents, adding, “If I blew it, they blew it too.” But agents past and present are telling a different story – namely, they’re not letting Comey lay his “cowardly” whitewash on them.

For one thing, agents say Comey tied their hands by agreeing to unprecedented ground rules and other outlandish demands made by lawyers for Clinton and her aides that severely hampered agents.

Dennis V. Hughes, the first head of the FBI’s computer investigations unit, told Sperry, “In my 25 years with the bureau, I never had any ground rules in my interviews.”

In addition, Comey did not to go to Justice Department prosecutors or insist in convening a grand jury that could compel testimony and authorize the seizing of evidence. Rather, he granted immunity to several key witnesses, including some potential targets.

And those immunity deals came with ridiculous side deals, including one that prevented agents from searching for any documents on a Dell laptop owned by former Clinton chief of staff and longtime loyalist Cheryl Mills that were generated after Jan. 31, 2015, when she had back-and-forth conversations with the server administration who destroyed emails that had been subpoenaed.

In addition, Comey even agreed to allow Mills to destroy the laptop after the very restricted search, meaning he may have been an accessory to the destruction of evidence.

“The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation will suffer for a long time,” Hughes said. “I hold Director Comey responsible.”

Other retired and current agents agreed, with some even suggesting that Congress subpoena the agents who actually conducted the investigation to answer questions about how Comey – who had them all sign non-disclosure agreements – ordered them to investigate.

Sources:

NYPost.com

Freedom.news

More PROOF the FBI conspired with the Clintons to cover up their crimes

October 4, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

The evidence is clear: The FBI has been completely politicized during the current administration, and it’s going to be difficult for the nation’s top federal law enforcement agency to ever earn back its once-stellar reputation. And who is to blame, you ask. None other than President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other top democrats.

As reported by Zero Hedge, a letter that has just been released by the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, apparently the FBI struck secret side agreements with Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson allowing them to destroy their “laptops after concluding its search.”

Mills has been a top aide, protector and lieutenant for both Bill and Hillary Clinton for decades. Most recently she served alongside Mrs. Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State, when she became the focus of an FBI investigation for mishandling classified information via a private server she set up in her home in Chappaqua, New York.

In the letter, Goodlatte inquired as to why the department and the bureau would permit the destruction of laptops that were used to sort Clinton’s emails as part of immunity deals that had already been struck, protecting Mills and Samuelson from any prosecution based on records found on their computers. What the public is also learning is that, according to those immunity agreements, FBI agents had to limit their searches to documents that were written before January 2015.

Goodlatte argued that those ridiculous parameters prevented FBI investigators from analyzing potential proof that there had been destruction of evidence – a crime in and of itself – that took place after the January 2015 date, and that deals already offered to Mills and Samuelson protected them from any prosecution related to any alleged deletion of subpoenaed emails.

“Like many things about this case, these new materials raise more questions than answers,” Goodlatte wrote of the “side agreements,” which lawmakers were allowed to read even though they had not yet been released in full to members of Congress, Zero Hedge noted.

Mills and Samuelson negotiated their immunity deals before they even turned over their laptops and they were subsequently destroyed, as we have now learned.

Looking through the letter it is difficult to ascertain as to why the FBI essentially granted immunity to just about every key player involved in this mess, leaving no room to apply any pressure on Clinton. Aides who were given “get out of jail free” cards have no incentive to be honest with investigators and implicate Clinton in anything.

So they didn’t. And guess what? The FBI decided not to recommend her prosecution, even though Director James Comey laid out in detail everything she did wrong (including what, for other lesser beings, would have led to some serious prison-time).

What’s more, it now appears as though the bureau was a co-conspirator in assuring that key evidence would be destroyed.

If you are an American who still believes that Clinton is not guilty – or worse, that she is but you don’t care because she belongs to the ‘right’ political party – you are contributing to our country’s eventual collapse. The fact is, we won’t survive as a viable nation, let alone a superpower, if the rule of law does not apply to all of our citizens equally.

Sources:

ZeroHedge.com

FBI.gov

Proof FBI head James Comey is a Clinton operative, let Hillary get away with crimes

September 30, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

At one point FBI Director James Comey had a reputation as a straight-shooter – a Washington insider who was considered to be above the political fray.

Not anymore.

In recent days the FBI’s own data dump to the public – the release of documents related to the supposed “investigation” into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s highly improper use of a private email server during her tenure as President Obama’s secretary of state – prove that the probe was a sham from the outset. Clinton was never going to be held responsible for her very illegal handling of classified intelligence over her unsecured private server.

John R. Schindler, a former NSA intelligence analyst and counterintelligence officer, Naval War College professor and espionage specialist, wrote in The Observer that from the moment “Emailgate” became a scandal, it was obvious that the FBI, highly politicized under Obama, had no stomach for prosecuting Clinton and her pals – or, really, any high-ranking Democrat.

The most recent document dump, Schindler notes, makes it clear that:

Clinton either repeatedly and purposefully lied to the FBI (a crime in and of itself) and to Congress about her email habits, or she is far too stupid to be commander-in-chief;

The FBI “completely ignored” that fact that there was highly classified signals intelligence in Clinton’s email, including information that was taken verbatim from Top Secret NSA briefings in 2011. (For some reason, Schindler says, no one at the FBI bothered to ask Team Clinton about these emails.);

The bureau granted immunity to so many key players during its investigation – including Hillary’s lawyer Heather Samuelson, State Department IT boss John Bental, and by far the most consequential figure, Cheryl Mills, that there was no way agents were ever going to get enough traction to recommend prosecution.

Even Congress was stunned about the granting of immunity to Mills, who has long ties to Hillary and served as the State Department’s chief of staff and counselor throughout her tenure. Schindler says granting her immunity, “given her deep involvement” in the scandal – including the destruction of tens of thousands of emails – is curious, especially considering the fact that she also sat in on Clinton’s July chat with the FBI over Emailgate.

“The whole thing stinks,” explained a retired FBI senior official who was obviously upset and confused by the current state of his former employer. “This was impossible in my time, unthinkable.”

Schindler adds that Mills’ immunity deal now needs further investigation, and Congress may do it. But so what? What are lawmakers prepared to do if they find out everything about the deal stinks?

Given Congress’ track record of impotence, maybe it’s just better to save the taxpayers money and hope to hold the next president – and his/her appointees – accountable.

Of course, that won’t happen if Hillary wins in November.

Sources:

RedState.com

Observer.com

TownHall.com

NY Times ‘warned’ Clinton to delete her emails

September 13, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

On the surface it looked as if The New York Times was doing its journalistic duty when it first reported that then-Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton had used a private email server to conduct official business as secretary of state. Turns out that the paper may have been warning her to cover her tracks, instead.

As reported by The Hill, scores of Clinton’s emails were deleted after the Times published its story March 2, according to notes from the FBI’s investigation into her private server use that were released last week.

While The Hill attempted to portray the deletion as a “mistake,” a reasonable person reading the passage would conclude that the deletion was more likely done on purpose. The FBI note reads as follows:

In a follow-up FBI interview on May 3, 2016, —— Indicated he believed he had an ‘oh s–t’ moment and sometime between March 25-31, 2015 deleted the Clinton archive mailbox from PRN server and used BleachBit to delete the exported .PST files he had created on the server system containing Clinton;s e-mails. [sic]

Given the gravity of, and implications for Clinton contained in the Times report, along with the fact that all of Clinton’s emails are supposed to be a matter of public record, having such “moments” because you “mistakenly” deleted those records is totally implausible. You have them as a result of being involved in your boss’ scheme to hide her communications from being revealed in a newspaper.

And speaking of the Times report, given the paper’s historical editorial tilt in favor of Clinton and the Democrats in general, was it truly written in the spirit of keeping a watchful eye on those in power, as the founders envisioned a free press would do?

Was it just a momentary lapse of the Times’ usual ideological defense of Clinton – a one-off story to give the paper the appearance of being unbiased?

Or was it written as a warning to her campaign that they needed to do some technological housekeeping before the campaign ramped up in earnest?

Whatever it was, the Times story prompted Clinton allies to begin vacuuming her email files (the “oh s—t” moment), even to the point of using a program – Bleachbit – to “prevent recovery” of electronic files. So effective at cleaning hard drives of data is Bleachbit, that Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C. remarked that “even God can’t read them.”

The story also gave the Clinton campaign a heads-up, allowing aides and likely the candidate herself to decide which of her emails she would eventually make public (though during its investigation the FBI found she had violated the Federal Records Act).

If all this sounds like some wild conspiracy theory, consider this: In the end, FBI Director James Comey himself said he did not believe any “reasonable prosecutor” at the Justice Department would indict her, ostensibly because of a lack of evidence.

Sources:

More proof NSA dragnet surveillance doesn’t keep us safe

August 3, 2016 by D. Samuelson Leave a Comment

Remember those antiquated party lines? At any time, when you picked up your receiver, you might hear one of your neighbors chatting. They were on the same circuit, along with other neighbors. The protocol was to say “Oh, excuse me,” and immediately hang up. Only the nosy busybody would cover the mouthpiece and keep listening. You’d make your call when their conversation was done. If it were an emergency, you’d shout and the other party would immediately disconnect.

From those lackadaisical days, the tumultuous buildup to code cracking and the information age made giant leaps in the decades surrounding World War II. IBM supplied punch cards to the Third Reich, while a small group led by visionary mathematician Alan Turning cracked the code from Germany’s Enigma machine. The definition of information even changed from a communication that had meaning, to any signal was being transmitted through a wire. Or shall we now say, anything that goes through WIFI?

Do we really know what the NSA, CIA, FBI, Director of National Intelligence (DONI) do with our data?

Fast-forward to today’s sprawling complex of interconnected global digital signals, where any phone call, transaction, medical or financial record, email, tweet, photograph, or any digital print you make can be recorded, analyzed, stored and used by a vast, ever-enormous and ever-growing list of governmental agencies. The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect us from unwarranted searches and seizures without probable cause. But your phone calls are now on a surveillance party line, and your location is freely available.

Phys.org reports, “Police don’t need a warrant to obtain mobile phone location data for a criminal investigation, a US appeals court ruled . . .[Judge Diana Motz] wrote that the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment . . . does not apply in this case, because the phone users have no reasonable expectation of privacy.”

Drones use SIM cards to track their target. Do you feel safer now?

It’s under the guise of our own security and safety that we’re being subject to this vast multiplexed surveillance state. And if that was the truth, wouldn’t there be ample evidence that these invasive methods are working? Especially since, according to TheIntercept.com, the NSA and CIA doubled the number of warrant-less searches on U.S. citizens for foreign intelligence purposes between 2013 and 2015. And that doesn’t count the FBI. But terror is on the increase. NewsMax.com has reported thirteen attacks that are related to Islamic Jihad from 2003 to 2015. Their list doesn’t include the recent Orlando incident. One striking conclusion is that of those 13 attacks, over half of them occurred at the same time the NSA and CIA were sweeping more Americans into their sights.

Terror attacks and surveillance are both at an all time high. What gives?

Edward Snowden has been called many things since he released documents describing the scope of NSA surveillance. Regardless of what camp you may be in, i.e., whistle blower, traitor, CIA operative or other, it’s clear that the conversation about our nation’s vast overreach of security measures is still being fleshed out. The torrents of media propaganda, disinformation methods, NSA collection methods, false flag events and actual terrorist strikes can be very difficult to sort out. TheIntercept.com poses five relevant questions, ranging from the nuanced meaning of the law, to who is watching those who watch us?

Here’s another way to ponder the safety question. According to TechJuice.pk, the odds of “dying in any kind of terrorist attack worldwide is 1 in 9,300,000.” Your bath tub and heart disease area actually much more dangerous.

Sources:

Science.NaturalNews.com

(Photo credit: Thestar.com)

When a criminal who cannot be indicted is elected to the highest office of the nation, it’s called a dictatorship

August 2, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

Earlier this month FBI Director James Comey, who once had a reputation for extreme fairness and was thought to be well above partisan politics, took to a podium in Washington, D.C., to tell a waiting nation something incredible: That despite all the evidence that Hillary Clinton, as secretary of state, had broken a number of federal statutes and rules governing the handling of classified materials, his agency would not recommend she be indicted by the Justice Department.

In laying out the case, Comey said:

— Scores of emails Clinton turned over contained classified information at the time they were sent or received;

— Clinton failed to turn over all her emails, as she claimed to have done, because the FBI found some of them;

— Clinton used more than one device and one server;

— Her system was not protected well or by any government software;

— It was likely that devices of associates with whom Clinton communicated had their devices hacked by foreign governments.

But despite all of that, his recommendation was not to prosecute.

“Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,” Comey said July 5.

TRANSLATION: She’s guilty but we won’t recommend prosecution.

“To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences.”

TRANSLATION: If you did this, you would be in prison.

In fact, others are in prison or where handed legal sentences for mishandling classified information.

Mind you, this was all preceded by a pair of highly unusual events:

— Attorney General Loretta Lynch just happened to be at the same Arizona airport as Bill Clinton the Saturday before Comey made his announcement, where they met in private for about 25 minutes (long enough to tell the former president why the Justice Dept. would – or, as we found out later – would not indict his wife).

— Clinton herself met on a weekend for about three hours with the FBI – highly unusual in its context and amount of time. After a year’s worth of investigation, the FBI only had about three hours’ worth of questions for Clinton? On a Saturday?

Apparently the fix was in from the outset – and Clinton herself told us so. The previous month, in an interview with Fox News, Clinton was asked by host Bret Baier if she was worried about a possible indictment. “That’s not going to happen,” she responded. “There is no basis for it, and I’m looking forward to this being wrapped up as soon as possible.”

Well, there was a basis for it – but she obviously knew more than the rest of us did as far as the final outcome was concerned, and that’s all that matters to her.

So once again, another Clinton escapes justice. Another Clinton who is running for president gets a pass for doing something that not only endangered national security, but that would have landed an ordinary American in jail for a very, very long time.

It’s hard to know exactly what the Clintons “have on everybody” in D.C., being able to slither away from obvious and serious violations of our laws. But it isn’t hard to figure out what to call a president who is far above the law: A dictator.

When the system of “justice” that is in place is so thoroughly corrupt that travesties like this can occur, we really don’t have a system anymore. We have a racket, and it’s being run by highly organized criminals posing as government officials and elected representatives.

Sources:

http://www.breitbart.com

http://biggovernment.news

https://www.fbi.gov

http://www.cnn.com

http://www.businessinsider.com

The head of the FBI’s shocking admission: You are no longer under any moral or ethical obligation to obey any federal laws whatsoever… the rule of law is now vacated across America

July 7, 2016 by Mike Adams Leave a Comment

The head of the FBI’s shocking admission: You are no longer under any moral or ethical obligation to obey any federal laws whatsoever… the rule of law is now vacated across America – NaturalNews.com

(Article by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger)

On July 5th, 2016, exactly 240 years and one day after the founding of the United States of America, FBI director James Comey detailed the criminal violations of written law committed by Hillary Clinton… and then declared that she alone should not be prosecuted for those clear violations. In doing so, James Comey cements his notoriety in history as the high-ranking government official who ended the rule of law in America and staked out a dark new era of runaway government lawlessness.Through his bizarre actions, James Comey just sent an undeniable message to all Americans: You are no longer under any moral or ethical obligation to abide by any federal law whatsoever, as such laws no longer apply equally to all people.

As explained by Chris Farrell, Director of Investigations & Research for Judicial Watch:

The public’s faith in the fair administration of justice was damaged by Attorney General Lynch’s meeting with President Clinton on the tarmac in Phoenix. It was further damaged by the apparent sweetheart “voluntary interview” of Mrs. Clinton by the FBI on the Saturday of the July 4th weekend.

Then just over 48 hours later (no doubt Mr. Comey spent the weekend carefully examining a year’s worth of interview transcripts), the proverbial stake was driven through the heart of any remaining faith and confidence in the public’s concept of “equal justice under law” or in Mr. Comey’s professional integrity by his nonsensical, contradictory, and insulting decision to let Mrs. Clinton “walk” on her national security crimes. No other federal government employee would have received the extraordinary, exceptional treatment Mr. Comey conferred on Mrs. Clinton.

If justice is not equal, then justice is a farce

Any law that does not apply to those in positions of high power is, by definition, null and void for all people living under a system of so-called “equal justice for all.” If laws do not apply to Hillary Clinton, then they apply to no one.

As of right now, according to Comey, you no longer need to abide by any federal laws whatsoever. The justice system is a farce. The written word no longer means the written word. The mental construct of law and order has just been shattered by the head of the FBI, the federal agency that once claimed to investigate those who violate the law. Yet now, even the FBI admits that laws don’t mean anything unless they want them to.

Effectively, there are no longer any legitimate federal laws in America… there are only Washington D.C. tyrants who selectively apply the illusion of law to their political enemies while ignoring all the same written laws for their political pals. When the top law enforcement investigation official for a nation takes to the public stage and declares that clearly written, unambiguous laws NO LONGER APPLY TO THOSE IN POWER, then the very construct of a law-abiding society has been evacuated and nullified.

Simply put, if the head of the FBI refuses to follow the law, then why should anybody else?

Listen to my Health Ranger Report podcast: James Comey and the FBI just LIED to the whole nation about Hillary Clinton.

Don’t lie, cheat and steal… the government hates competition

This does not mean, of course, that you should behave like an outlaw. I don’t recommend you run around lying, cheating and stealing all the time. After all, the federal government hates competition. If you really wish to extort people out of their money, just join the IRS.

Even though all federal laws have now been effectively nullified, I hope you operate with some measure of compassion, politeness and respect for the Golden Rule: Treat others as you wish to be treated in return. It’s also a good idea to abide by state and local laws, and they tend to have far greater legitimacy under the 10th Amendment (except for unconstitutional laws like SB 277 in California, of course).

Also, just because James Comey effectively nullified the very fabric of federal law, don’t think you can’t still be selectively prosecuted by federal officials. They can and will prosecute you for a long list of “crimes” even when you are completely innocent. Criminal prosecution of the innocent is one of the most potent “psychological terror” tactics of every tyrannical regime to oppress dissent and demand political obedience to the tyrants in power. Even worse, because the federal government is now utterly lawless, it does not need to abide by any laws, either, meaning it can arrest and prosecute you completely outside any written law, for any concocted reason whatsoever.

In other words, you do not even need to be guilty of anything in order to be arrested, prosecuted and imprisoned by the lawless regime that now rules Washington D.C. When the rule of law has been abandoned to protect the criminals of the political elite, that same lawlessness is inevitably turned toward the citizens to terrorize them into compliance with the totalitarian state. The federal government has effectively declared it doesn’t need to abide by laws… especially not when the regime in power invents or ignores whatever laws it wants at that particular moment, depending on whom it is trying to prosecute or protect.

Where will the nation go from here?

The bigger question in all this is how does America rid itself of this illegitimate, lawless, parasitic, incompetent cabal of America-hating traitors who currently occupy the positions of power in Washington D.C.?

To answer that question, I give you the words of Michael Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg who offers this wisdom:

None of this will be lost upon a citizenry which is already seething with rage and very close to a tipping point. Increasingly, the general public is coming to the very unpleasant realization that they live in a corporate oligarchy in which they are subjects rather than citizens. The more they are pushed into a corner, the sooner they will lash out in all sorts of ways.

The generational level revolts I anticipate have been a long time coming and will emanate from both rural, largely white America, as well from inner city communities populated mostly by minorities. The key thing we must all bear in mind going into the turbulent times ahead is that we are all in this together.

The status quo doesn’t care whether you are black, white, Jewish, Muslim, Christian, male, female, straight, gay or transgender. To the status quo we are all expendable peasants — cannon fodder. The establishment loves to play up the differences between us in order to divide us, but they don’t care about any of us. They will allocate all their energy and efforts into dividing and conquering the public in the period of civil unrest to come. If we fall for this trap we will have only ourselves to blame for the failure to turn grassroots protests into genuine, systemic change.

The other key variable as to whether the forthcoming rebellions result in any positive change will revolve around what form they take. When I say civil unrest, I am well aware that this likely means some degree of violence and looting; however, such expressions of frustration will do far more harm than good. We must recognize that as it stands the status quo has no actual legitimacy, and therefore can only succeed if it’s able to portray the abused public as the bad guys, and sell us on the idea that the U.S. government is the only thing standing between us and violent mobs.

If you want to win this battle, you need to be smart. Winning the hearts and minds of the general public is absolutely critical, and shouldn’t be difficult in an environment in which the establishment discredits itself on a daily basis.

To summarize, I think the activist community across American needs to do two things:

1. Stick together. Black, white, rural, urban, we are all in this together. Don’t allow yourselves to become divided — we have the same opponent. Never forget that.

2. Keep things non-violent. If violence happens, always make sure the government fires the first shots. If the general public perceives you to be out there looking for a fight as opposed to reacting to state aggression, you will lose. Think outside the box, be creative and employ non-violent civil disobedience whenever possible.

Learn more: www.naturalnews.com