ArchiveArchive

How 4chan trolled the CIA, CNN and BuzzFeed with hilarious fantasy that got reported as real news (infographic)

January 11, 2017 by Mike Adams Leave a Comment

(See INFOGRAPHIC below) From NaturalNews.com:

CNN and BuzzFeed just hit a whole new low as the world’s dirtiest “sleaze journalism” rags after being caught publishing erotic fanfiction fantasies as “CIA intelligence facts” to attack Donald Trump.

The revelations are astonishing and deeply damning to CNN and BuzzFeed, both of which utterly abandoned the most basic journalistic ethics in their rush to publish anything — including completely fabricated “fake news” — that might damage Donald Trump.

The allegations — which included bizarre, twisted fetish fantasies — were so obviously false and unsubstantiated that most news organizations refused to publish them. But CNN and BuzzFeed have abandoned any attachment to journalistic credibility and have demonstrated a shocking willingness to run with any and all news that they think might spread false rumors to damage the reputation of Donald Trump and his administration.

Here’s an infographic that pieces together what we know so far. What’s hilariously emerging from all this is how Arizona Sen. John McCain is such a laughable tool of disinfo and propaganda. Come to think of it, so is the CIA at this point…

Share this infographic widely. As this story is still developing, there may be more added to it over time, so check back:

Tour de FARCE: US Intel report on Russian “interference” a hilarious parade of paranoia politics… zero evidence… just rehashed delusional conspiracy theories

January 6, 2017 by Mike Adams Leave a Comment

We really have reached the point where everything that’s run by the political left has devolved into a parade of delusional paranoia. Whether it’s man-made “climate change,” the purely imagined “KKK hate crimes” epidemic, or the hilarious delusional conspiracy theory about Russians “hacking the election,” everything the left has come up with in recent memory is rooted in sheer fiction (if not slobbering mental illness).

The latest laughable attempt at creating a Russian boogeyman to scare all the little leftist snowflake children has arrived in the form of a US intel report released Friday. Titled, “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections,” the report is so laughably devoid of a single shred of credible evidence that actual journalists all across the world are rolling on the floor with hysterical laughter.

“Every time IC repackages its same assertions in a new form, media acts like it’s been proven, even though it – again – includes no evidence,” Tweeted one of the few remaining independent journalists on the planet, Glenn Greenwald.

Every time IC repackages its same assertions in a new form, media acts like it's been proven, even though it – again – includes no evidence: https://t.co/C5yRsZsJbS

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) January 6, 2017

In another tweet, Greenwald followed up with, “It’s shocking how much this report was hyped and how literally no effort was made to include *any* evidence at all.”

In response, left-wing trolls on Twitter accused Greenwald himself of “working for the Russians.” (That’s now the excuse the everything the left doesn’t like. Must be the Russians!)

A circle jerk of rehashed left-wing paranoia

In essence, a tiny number of Obama puppets inside the CIA and FBI just “made s##t up” and then tried to pass it off as legitimate intelligence. The laughably hysterical document — widely and blindly repeated everywhere in the obedient but mindless left-wing media — is nothing more than a circle jerk rehash of delusional conspiracy theories.

Notably, there isn’t a single piece of actual evidence found in the entire report.

The report spends much of its time covering RT, a media organization funded by the Kremlin: “RT’s coverage of Secretary Clinton throughout the US presidential campaign was consistently negative and focused on her leaked e-mails and accused her of corruption, poor physical and mental health, and ties to Islamic extremism,” says the report.

In other words, anyone who was critical of Hillary Clinton was obviously working with the Russians, right? Never mind that she was an unlikable, deeply corrupt, criminal-minded mob boss with an obvious neurological disorder who pre-sold the White House to foreign interests.

Opponents of fracking are also working for the Russians, you see

It gets even better. The report also implies that environmentalists and opponents of fracking are working for the Russians, too. (Yes, I know. It’s just beyond hilarious.)

“RT runs anti-fracking programming, highlighting environmental issues and the impacts on public health.”

Noooooo! Say it isn’t so! You mean to tell me that people who are concerned about the environmental impact of fracking are really working for the Russians? For the record, that’s about 90% of all leftists, by the way. Apparently, not only are all the people on the right working for the Russians (because they hate Hillary), but also all the people on the left are working for the Russians, too (because they hate fracking).

According to the CIA, then, everyone is working for the Russians. Except, not Hillary Clinton, we’re told, even though she was the U.S. Secretary of State who approved the Russian takeover of U.S. strategic uranium mines… a convenient fact the lying left-wing media refuses to report.

A Tour de Farce of intelligence bullsh#ttery

If you can stop laughing, consider the fact that the left-wing media takes this bogus intelligence report as “fact” even though it is completely devoid of any evidence. The entire thing is nothing more than Obama sycophants ginning up scary bedtime stories to tell each other, then labeling it all “intelligence.”

In truth, there’s no intelligence to be found in the report at all. It’s so devoid of facts, evidence and sources — but rife with opinions, conclusions and “analysis” of opinions — that the whole thing should probably be renamed Tour de Farce: The CIA’s Drug-Induced Assessment of Make-Believe Threats to the Kingdom of F##ktardia.

In conclusion, the report wildly discredits the CIA, FBI and NSA with its cringe-worthy (and obviously politically biased) “analysis” that reads more like twisted, drug-induced paranoid delusions than meaningful intelligence. The very first thing President Trump should do after being sworn in, obviously, is to drain the swamp at the CIA and remove every single analyst churning out this paranoid hogwash.

More proof NSA dragnet surveillance doesn’t keep us safe

August 3, 2016 by D. Samuelson Leave a Comment

Remember those antiquated party lines? At any time, when you picked up your receiver, you might hear one of your neighbors chatting. They were on the same circuit, along with other neighbors. The protocol was to say “Oh, excuse me,” and immediately hang up. Only the nosy busybody would cover the mouthpiece and keep listening. You’d make your call when their conversation was done. If it were an emergency, you’d shout and the other party would immediately disconnect.

From those lackadaisical days, the tumultuous buildup to code cracking and the information age made giant leaps in the decades surrounding World War II. IBM supplied punch cards to the Third Reich, while a small group led by visionary mathematician Alan Turning cracked the code from Germany’s Enigma machine. The definition of information even changed from a communication that had meaning, to any signal was being transmitted through a wire. Or shall we now say, anything that goes through WIFI?

Do we really know what the NSA, CIA, FBI, Director of National Intelligence (DONI) do with our data?

Fast-forward to today’s sprawling complex of interconnected global digital signals, where any phone call, transaction, medical or financial record, email, tweet, photograph, or any digital print you make can be recorded, analyzed, stored and used by a vast, ever-enormous and ever-growing list of governmental agencies. The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect us from unwarranted searches and seizures without probable cause. But your phone calls are now on a surveillance party line, and your location is freely available.

Phys.org reports, “Police don’t need a warrant to obtain mobile phone location data for a criminal investigation, a US appeals court ruled . . .[Judge Diana Motz] wrote that the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment . . . does not apply in this case, because the phone users have no reasonable expectation of privacy.”

Drones use SIM cards to track their target. Do you feel safer now?

It’s under the guise of our own security and safety that we’re being subject to this vast multiplexed surveillance state. And if that was the truth, wouldn’t there be ample evidence that these invasive methods are working? Especially since, according to TheIntercept.com, the NSA and CIA doubled the number of warrant-less searches on U.S. citizens for foreign intelligence purposes between 2013 and 2015. And that doesn’t count the FBI. But terror is on the increase. NewsMax.com has reported thirteen attacks that are related to Islamic Jihad from 2003 to 2015. Their list doesn’t include the recent Orlando incident. One striking conclusion is that of those 13 attacks, over half of them occurred at the same time the NSA and CIA were sweeping more Americans into their sights.

Terror attacks and surveillance are both at an all time high. What gives?

Edward Snowden has been called many things since he released documents describing the scope of NSA surveillance. Regardless of what camp you may be in, i.e., whistle blower, traitor, CIA operative or other, it’s clear that the conversation about our nation’s vast overreach of security measures is still being fleshed out. The torrents of media propaganda, disinformation methods, NSA collection methods, false flag events and actual terrorist strikes can be very difficult to sort out. TheIntercept.com poses five relevant questions, ranging from the nuanced meaning of the law, to who is watching those who watch us?

Here’s another way to ponder the safety question. According to TechJuice.pk, the odds of “dying in any kind of terrorist attack worldwide is 1 in 9,300,000.” Your bath tub and heart disease area actually much more dangerous.

Sources:

Science.NaturalNews.com

(Photo credit: Thestar.com)

Could the CIA illegally use Pokémon Go to track your every move?

July 14, 2016 by Mary Wilder Leave a Comment

Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve likely heard of Pokémon Go. The new app inspired by the classic video game series has become a cultural phenomenon in a matter of days. Though seemingly marketed towards young children and families, the app seems to be most popular among teenagers and people in their 20s — and it could be incredibly dangerous.

The way the game works is that Pokémon (small, animated creatures) appear throughout your area and — by using your smartphone — you travel to these places in order to capture them. It forces users to get up and physically walk around outside instead of just sitting on the couch. As a result, the game was championed by many for supporting a healthy lifestyle.

Similarly, the game seems to have brought people together. Due to the large amount of people currently playing, many users meet each other at the locations where they go to catch Pokémon. Friendships have been created, alliances have been formed. Everything that has come out of this app’s popularity appears to be a positive.

But could there be something darker at play here?

Many have speculated that the game is a CIA invention that is currently being used to spy on the American people in order to obtain private information. Since the terms and conditions to use the app are filled with lots of legal double-talk, many began to believe that the application has been gaining access to users’ private emails, text messages, and anything else they have on their phone.

For the game to work, having your location and camera enabled are necessary. Since the Pokémon appear “in the wild,” the app uses a GPS-style tracking system that utilizes your own camera to see the Pokémon in the real world. It’s an excellent excuse that people on both sides of the argument can use to fit their own beliefs.

So what do you think? Is this a harmless game or are we all falling into the trap of some darker forces at work?

Sources:

Gizmondo.com

TheNewDaily.com

Gawker.com