ArchiveArchive
Edward Snowden

Snowden sheds light on recent NSA hack; talks false flags

Edward Snowden is an American hero.

In the modern era, it’s difficult to think of someone more patriotic than Snowden, considering the man essentially ruined his own life in order to expose the truth of the NSA’s corruption to the American public at large.

Currently living in Russia under political asylum, Snowden has remained a popular figure in regards to free speech and journalism in the years following his exposure of the NSA. With well over two million followers on Twitter, Snowden remains active on the social network — often revealing information about political issues regarding the NSA.

Recently, the iconic whistleblower revealed via Twitter his theory that the Russians are behind the recent NSA hack. He tweeted, “This leak looks like a somebody sending a message that an escalation in the attribution game could get messy fast.”

If Snowden’s theory is correct, there could be devastating consequences. If it is revealed that the United States government has been targeting their own allies, we could be facing a World War III scenario. The current political landscape of the entire world is dangerous and uncertain, and there’s no doubt that the revelation of allies attempting to destroy each other would lead to a complete disaster for the entire planet.

As a result, it’s important for everyone — from civilians to soldiers — to be prepared for the absolute worst. There’s no telling when and where the collapse will begin, but it seems to become more and more likely every day. Recent email and server hacks have revealed that governments all across the world are lying to their citizens and each other. It’s only a matter of time before there is violent retaliation in response to this form of deception.

Right now, we don’t know exact details regarding the NSA hack or who was responsible. The only thing to know for sure is that if nothing drastic changes — and soon — then war is inevitable.

 

Sources:

TheIntercept.com

RT.com

surveillance

More proof NSA dragnet surveillance doesn’t keep us safe

Remember those antiquated party lines? At any time, when you picked up your receiver, you might hear one of your neighbors chatting. They were on the same circuit, along with other neighbors. The protocol was to say “Oh, excuse me,” and immediately hang up. Only the nosy busybody would cover the mouthpiece and keep listening. You’d make your call when their conversation was done. If it were an emergency, you’d shout and the other party would immediately disconnect.

From those lackadaisical days, the tumultuous buildup to code cracking and the information age made giant leaps in the decades surrounding World War II. IBM supplied punch cards to the Third Reich, while a small group led by visionary mathematician Alan Turning cracked the code from Germany’s Enigma machine. The definition of information even changed  from a communication that had meaning, to any signal was being transmitted through a wire. Or shall we now say, anything that goes through WIFI?

Do we really know what the NSA, CIA, FBI, Director of National Intelligence (DONI) do with our data?

Fast-forward to today’s sprawling complex of interconnected global digital signals, where any phone call, transaction, medical or financial record, email, tweet, photograph, or any digital print you make can be recorded, analyzed, stored and used by a vast, ever-enormous and ever-growing list of governmental agencies. The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect us from unwarranted searches and seizures without probable cause. But your phone calls are now on a surveillance party line, and your location is freely available.

Phys.org reports, “Police don’t need a warrant to obtain mobile phone location data for a criminal investigation, a US appeals court ruled . . .[Judge Diana Motz] wrote that the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment . . .  does not apply in this case, because the phone users have no reasonable expectation of privacy.”

Drones use SIM cards to track their target. Do you feel safer now?

It’s under the guise of our own security and safety that we’re being subject to this vast multiplexed surveillance state. And if that was the truth, wouldn’t there be ample evidence that these invasive methods are working? Especially since, according to TheIntercept.com, the NSA and CIA doubled the number of warrant-less searches on U.S. citizens for foreign intelligence purposes between 2013 and 2015. And that doesn’t count the FBI. But terror is on the increase. NewsMax.com has reported thirteen attacks that are related to Islamic Jihad from 2003 to 2015. Their list doesn’t include the recent Orlando incident. One striking conclusion is that of those 13 attacks, over half of them occurred at the same time the NSA and CIA were sweeping more Americans into their sights.

Terror attacks and surveillance are both at an all time high. What gives?

Edward Snowden has been called many things since he released documents describing the scope of NSA surveillance. Regardless of what camp you may be in, i.e., whistle blower, traitor, CIA operative or other, it’s clear that the conversation about our nation’s vast overreach of security measures is still being fleshed out. The torrents of media propaganda, disinformation methods, NSA collection methods, false flag events and actual terrorist strikes can be very difficult to sort out. TheIntercept.com poses five relevant questions, ranging from the nuanced meaning of the law, to who is watching those who watch us?

Here’s another way to ponder the safety question. According to TechJuice.pk, the odds of “dying in any kind of terrorist attack worldwide is 1 in 9,300,000.” Your bath tub and heart disease area actually much more dangerous.

 

Sources:

Phys.org

ComputerWorld.com

TheIntercept.com

NewsMax.com

TheIntercept.com

TechJuice.pk

Science.NaturalNews.com

(Photo credit: Thestar.com)

terrorists

From your phone calls to your texts: how closely is the NSA’s ‘Spynet’ following you?

The computer system that the National Security Agency (also known as the Illegal Spying Agency) uses to identify and track “terrorists” is seriously flawed, warns a shocking new report that takes a closer look at the leaked documents put forward by former NSA subcontractor-turned-whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Many innocent people, particularly in Pakistan, are at serious risk of being killed by a ground-based death squad or unmanned drone strike because NSA’s “SKYNET” program — hink Terminator movies— doesn’t know how to accurately differentiate between legitimate threats and people whose behaviors simply deviate from the norm.

The report indicates that the NSA’s metadata sweeps, which is really just code for illegal spying activities, involve putting an artificial intelligence-based computer algorithm in charge of determining whether or not somebody is a “threat.” It then uses this information to determine whether or not the “threat” needs to be defused.

The Big Brother implications of this evil and highly corrupt system are enough to convince even the most stalwart skeptic that the U.S. government has way too much power — power that it continually uses to murder innocent lives to advance the globalist agenda. And even those on the inside are starting to speak up about the horrors that are taking place under SKYNET’s watch.

According to Human Rights Data Analysis’ executive director Patrick Ball, NSA’s SKYNET program is “ridiculously optimistic,” meaning it tends to target all sorts of innocent people because, quite frankly, it’s a robot with a mind of its own.

“The program, cheekily called SKYNET after the humanity-destroying artificial intelligence from the Terminator franchise, tracks movements and known associates, then an algorithm analyzes all that Big Data and flags potential terrorists to be targeted for drone strikes,” explains New York Magazine.

“The problem is, a data expert told Ars Technica this week, that algorithm is ‘completely [bollocks].'”

More than 4,000 innocent Pakistanis have been murdered by American military under Obama’s watch

A much more detailed explanation of SKYNET’s flaws is available at Ars Technica, but it suffice to say that in order for the system to work, there has to be a certain number of known terrorists within a population. And as of this writing, there are currently only seven in Pakistan, among a population of about 55 million.

This means that innocent people are being pinned and labeled as “terrorists” by the NSA even though they’ve done absolutely nothing wrong. And some of them are ending up dead as a result, the product of a perpetual, U.S.-led “war on terror” that is sowing carnage, misery, and death all throughout the world.

Even the NSA admits that its system has a 0.008 percent false-positive rate, which translates to about 15,000 people in Pakistan alone who will be erroneously tagged as terrorists, and potentially gunned down in a drone or military strike.

It’s the reason why so many people spoke out against NSA spying, warning that such activity represents a threat to everyone, not just Pakistanis. If it’s happening there, you can be sure it will eventually happen here, should the powers that be see a “need” to implement this type of “security” apparatus on domestic soil.

“Big Data being used to show you ads or recommend friends can certainly feel intrusive, but when Facebook gets it wrong, the worst consequence is that icky, uncanny valley feeling,” New York Magazine says.

“But that’s nothing compared to what can happen when machine learning goes wrong for a military-intelligence app in Pakistan. It can literally be life or death.”

Sources include:

TheDailySheeple.com

HRDAG.org

NYMag.com

Science.NaturalNews.com