28736470374_f9fbe46dfe_b

SOURCES: EMP attack to be unleashed on America to stop election if Trump looks likely to win

There have been many dire predictions – mainly from the political Left – about what would happen in the U.S. and the world if Republican presidential nominee Donald J. Trump beats his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, next month.

Financial ruin. Loss of U.S. allies. Stock market collapse. And now, an electromagnetic pulse attack on our country that would throw us back to the 18th century in terms of technology.

As noted by Dave Hodges of The Common Sense Show, four separate sources have contacted him in recent days with some shocking observations and predictions, all of which appear to add up to one thing: A Trump victory would lead to a catastrophic attack on our country, perhaps using an EMP weapon.

One source who works at a nuclear power plant told Hodges that “Palo Verde Unit 2 tripped” one night just recently, meaning it went from 100 percent power to 0 percent. And while that one incident wasn’t particularly newsworthy, the source went on to say that U-1 and U-3 units tripped at different times during the previous two weeks. That’s bizarre, the source said, because “these units will normally run ‘breaker to breaker’ with NO issues at all,” adding they run for 18 straight months without problems.

A second source who also works at a nuclear plant speculated that officials with the Department of Homeland Security, FEMA and the North American Electric Reliability Corp. may believe that a “grid down scenario” is coming because the premise of the plant inspection was to find out how long the facility could continue cooling its fuel rods without power before a meltdown began. The answer: 10 days – an answer that “scared the hell out of them.”

The third source, Gary Haevin, the producer of Amerigedon, told Hodges on a recent program of the EMP event (interview can be accessed here; the EMP discussion begins around the 10:00 mark). Haevin said he knows someone very influential in the Trump campaign and that they’ve been told the globalists would unleash an EMP attack to stop the election from taking place if it looks like the GOP nominee will win. “Trump is a real threat to their world order, and I don’t think they’re going to allow it to happen,” Haevin said.

Finally, a fourth source – a former military commander – said directly that an EMP attack was definitely a consideration if it looks like Trump can beat Clinton in just a few short weeks. “He said an EMP attack was still very much on the table and that we are looking at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and DHS preparing to strengthen the defense of our nuclear power plants. He said they have stepped up the plants ability to maintain cooling capabilities in case of an EMP attack,” Hodges wrote on his web site.

Sources:

Mediaarchives.gsradio.net

NERC.com

NewsTarget.com

Trump-Clinton-Debate

First Presidential Debate: Actual Reason for our Staggering National Debt Ignored

During the debate on Monday rivals Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump offered more of the same in the way of proposed economic solutions for America.

Trump declared he will prevent corporations from leaving the country. He said his proposed tax reductions will put an end to the flood or companies leaving. “That’s going to be a job creator like we haven’t seen since [Ronald] Reagan,” he said.

Clinton responded by saying she will jack up taxes on the wealthy and close down corporate loopholes. She mocked Trump’s plan as “Trumped up, trickle down.”

Trump criticized NAFTA and other globalist trade deals and noted the legislation was ushered in by Hillary’s husband.

Clinton said she wants to renegotiate trade deals and make them more favorable to the United States. She deflected previous criticism by saying “let’s not assume trade is the only challenge we have in the economy.”

Both candidates proposed spending a fortune on fixing the crumbling US infrastructure, although how they would pay for it was not addressed.

Clinton touched on the national debt, but only to attack Trump’s tax proposals.

“Independent experts have looked at what I’ve proposed and looked at what Donald’s proposed, and basically they’ve said this, that if his tax plan, which would blow up the debt by over $5 trillion and would in some instances disadvantage middle-class families compared to the wealthy, were to go into effect, we would lose 3.5 million jobs and maybe have another recession,” she said.

Trump responded, noting Obama has raised to the debt to an astronomical level.

“The Obama administration, from the time they’ve come in, is over 230 years’ worth of debt, and he’s topped it. He’s doubled it in a course of almost eight years, seven-and-a-half years, to be semi- exact,” he said.

Trump is correct. Obama has nearly doubled the national debt. When he entered the White House the debt stood at 10.6 trillion dollars. It is now 19.5 trillion dollars, according to figures compiled by the Treasury Department.

“Obama still has several months to go until the end of his second term,” notes Michael Snyder of The Economic Collapse. “That means that an average of more than 1.1 trillion dollars a year will be added to the national debt during his presidency. We are stealing a tremendous amount of consumption from the future to make the economy look much, much better than it otherwise would be, and we are systematically destroying the future in the process.” He added an additional 1.36 trillion dollars to the national debt during the fiscal year that is now coming to an end.

How did we get here?

The national debt is directly attributable to the Federal Reserve. In 1971, under President Nixon, the United States moved away from the gold standard and the Fed was allowed to print money out of thin air. This opened the floodgates for unrestrained government borrowing, spending, and an exponentially rising “public debt.”

The Fed keeps the scheme going by holding interest rates artificially low. Since whatever the government owes is inherited by the people, it’s the people who ultimately get stuck with the bill. If the interest was allowed to return to market rates, it would help prevent the government from borrowing beyond its means.

Unfortunately, the obvious solution—ending the Fed and instituting a sane monetary policy—was not addressed on Monday night.

Sources

MarketWatch

The Washington Post

Treasury Department

The Economic Collapse

Julian Assange

WikiLeaks prepares for release of more Clinton emails ahead of election

On Wednesday, Fox News conducted an interview with WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange.

Assange said the release of more Clinton emails is in the works.

“We have a lot of material, thousands of pages of material,” Assange told Megyn Kelly. “There’s a variety of different types of documents and different types of institutions that are associated with the election campaign, some quite unexpected angles that are, you know, quite interesting, some even entertaining.”

Assange’s timing is designed to inflict damage at crucial junctures in the election cycle. The DNC emails were released during the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia and ultimately resulted in the removal of Debbie Wasserman Schultz as the DNC boss.

Kelly asked if the next leak will be a “game changer” and Assange said it would.

“I think it’s significant. You know, it depends on how it catches fire in the public and in the media,” he said.

Media pickup of any future story is crucial. Earlier this week, the establishment media ran with stories criticizing WikiLeaks, accusing the whistleblower organization of exposing data insensitive to gay people, sick children and rape victims.

Tweets went out accusing The Huffington Post, The Independent, Mediaite and others of fabrication and distorting the facts. Much of the information attributed to Wikileaks came from other sources.

The effort to discredit WikiLeaks is coordinated in part by the elite of the Democratic party.

“Democratic leaders are putting out a warning that could help inoculate Hillary Clinton against an October cyber surprise: Any future mass leaks of embarrassing party emails might contain fake information inserted by Russian hackers,” Politico reported with an explanation saying the information came from a conference call between Rep. Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic Party leaders who are strategizing how to minimize the fallout from leaks.

Clinton has avoided addressing numerous controversies by shunning the press and refusing to hold press conferences, thus allowing a friendly corporate media to fend off criticism of the candidate. She has not held a press conference for 260 days.

The Washington Post criticized this tactic:

Jokes aside, it’s beyond ridiculous that one of the two people who will be elected president in 80 or so days continues to refuse to engage with the press in this way.

But she does sit-down interviews! And she did a “press conference” with a moderator, um, moderating the questions!

Not good enough. Not when you are running to be president of the United States. One of the most important things when someone is offering themselves up to represent all of us is that we get the best sense we can about how that person thinks on his or her feet, how they deal with unwanted or adversarial questions. Those two traits are big parts of doing the job of president in the modern world.

There’s nothing like a press conference to put a candidate for president through their paces. If you don’t believe me, just watch how Clinton handled this presser — not well! — when she tried to put the email server controversy to rest.

In the end, the corporate media effort to ignore or underplay the damage inflicted by revelations of Clinton’s corruption and lawbreaking may prove successful, especially when the audience is a largely disengaged electorate.

Meanwhile, the establishment heaps dirt on the campaign of Donald Trump every single day, thus revealing its preference and bias.

 

Sources:

Politico

The Washington Post

trumpclinton-1466840998

Trump fights back against establishment media campaign to discredit him

On Monday, presidential candidate Donald Trump led a foray against the establishment media.

In addition to a flurry of tweets, Trump sent out a Mainstream Media Accountability Survey via email. “We are running against the very dishonest and totally biased media!” the email reads. “It’s time to hold the media accountable for trying to rig this election against us.”

Trump’s recent criticism of the establishment media follows a story The New York Times published about the alleged secret work that Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, had done for Viktor F. Yanukovych, the elected leader of Ukraine who was deposed during a State Department engineered coup.

“One again The New York Times has chosen to purposefully ignore facts and professional journalism to fit their political agenda, choosing to attack my character and reputation rather than present an honest report,” Manafort said in a statement, adding that the accusation that he “accepted cash payments is unfounded, silly and nonsensical.”

“I have never received a single ‘off-the-books cash payment’ as falsely ‘reported’ by The New York Times, nor have I ever done work for the governments of Ukraine or Russia,” he insisted.

Manafort then excoriated The Times for ignoring the corruption of Hillary Clinton. “The Times does fail to disclose the fact that the Clinton Foundation has taken (and may still take) payments in exchange for favors from Hillary Clinton while serving as Secretary of State,” he said.

“This is not discussed despite the overwhelming evidence in emails that Hillary Clinton attempted to cover up.”

The reason the establishment media does not cover the Clinton Foundation scandal is obvious: NBC Universal, News Corporation, Turner Broadcasting and Thomson Reuters are among more than a dozen media organizations that have made contributions to the foundation.

“The list also includes mass media groups like Comcast, Time Warner and Viacom, as well a few notable individuals, including Carlos Slim, the Mexican telecom magnate and largest shareholder of The New York Times Company, and James Murdoch, the chief operating officer of 21st Century Fox. Both Slim and Murdoch have given between $1 million to $5 million, respectively,” writes Josh Gerstein for Politico.

The donations span the supposed political divide, and include Newsmax, Google, Bloomberg Philanthropies, Mort Zuckerman, George Stephanopoulos and others.

Trump’s strategic attack arrives at a time when public attitudes toward the establishment media are at a historical low.

“Over the last two decades, research shows the public has grown increasingly skeptical of the news industry,” a report from the American Press Institute released in April reads. “The study reaffirms that consumers do value broad concepts of trust like fairness, balance, accuracy, and completeness. At least two-thirds of Americans cite each of these four general principles as very important to them.”

Even journalists believe that the establishment media is not only biased, but corrupt. “There is unprecedented, I believe, influence on the media, not just the news, but the images you see everywhere. By well-orchestrated and financed campaign of special interests, political interests and corporations. I think all of that comes into play,” a CBS reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, told Fox News host Bill O’Reilly.

“Broadly there are overarching concerns about, I would say just fear over original investigative reporting,” she added.

According to a report by the Associated Press, Democrats are more likely to believe establishment media news stories than are Republicans and independents.

“Just 6 percent of people say they have a lot of confidence in the media, putting the news industry about equal to Congress and well below the public’s view of other institutions. In this presidential campaign year, Democrats were more likely to trust the news media than Republicans or independents.”

Donald Trump’s latest effort to fight back against negative propaganda aimed at his presidential bid appears to be well-timed and executed, especially following the outrageous charge by the media that he encouraged gun owners and supporters of the Second Amendment to assassinate Hillary Clinton.

Sources include:

NYTimes.com

TheHill.com

Politico.com

AmericanPressInstitute.org

TruthRevolt.org

BigStory.AP.org

Breitbart.com

taxes-e1460610068135

Trump to halt government theft of your money after you die

It truly is one of the most outrageous taxes ever levied on the American people. Formally called an “estate tax,” critics have rightfully dubbed it a death tax because it is levied on estates when the owners of said estate pass away.

Republican presidential nominee Donald J. Trump wants to end it, as reported by Bloomberg Politics, so hopefully there will be enough members of Congress left after November to help him accomplish his goal.

The first thing to note is that not all estates are taxed when the owners die. Under current law, estates valued at more than $5.45 million for an individual and at more than $10.9 million for a couple are taxed at a whopping 40 percent. And while you may not care if you’re not in this particular tax bracket, just imagine if you were: This tax law gives the government the authority to appropriate nearly half of an estate, all of which should be passed along to the rightful heirs. It is a tax on a person’s lifetime accumulated wealth.

And there is this. Estate taxes are after-the-fact taxes because everything within an estate that has been built, bought and paid for has already been taxed. What’s more, estates – like normal homes – are taxed annually in nearly every jurisdiction in the country to support local government, schools and other infrastructure. So you never really truly own your estate or property; miss just one of these tax payments and you’ll see a lien slapped on your property faster than you can say “stop taxing me so much.”

What’s more, it’s bad enough that Uncle Sam taxes us for as long as we’re alive. Taxing us at the end of our lives is just piling on.

Finally, it’s also bad that the tax code is skewered toward “the rich” – only wealthy estates get the death tax – because that is essentially our government punishing the most successful among us. Our economic system of capitalism – when it was still being practiced – was established by our founders to reward hard work, education, dedication and ingenuity, and because it was we’ve seen ours grow into the world’s number one economy. Death taxes are completely anathema to that founding principle.

Eliminating the death tax would actually be beneficial economically for a number of reasons. As noted in a study by the Heritage Foundation, though the tax only applies to a small percentage of Americans and raises only a miniscule amount of revenue, it has a harmful effect on job creation and reduces growth rates.

The group estimates that eliminating the estate tax and related gift taxes, that would boost the economy by more than $46 billion over the next 10 years because it would free up financial assets that would be used for private sector investment and income growth.

Not only that, eliminating the tax would be a boon for the small, family-owned businesses. Many of them, Heritage says, may be rich in assets but they are cash-poor. Being forced to come up with the cold, hard cash demanded by Uncle Sam for cash-poor, asset-rich businesses means that heirs often have to sell them just to pay the taxes.

It’s time for this punitive tax to go away. Trump is the one pushing to eliminate it.

Sources for this story include:

Bloomberg.com

Heritage.org

Editorial-Use-Donald-Trump-Podium-Smile

Liberal Tech Companies Team Up to Defeat Trump

Now that the primaries are history and the election is right around the corner, the effort to take down Donald Trump and ensure Hillary’s coronation has shifted into high gear.

Liz Crokin writing for Observer Politics reports:

The usual suspects from left-leaning major media outlets like The New York Times, MSNBC, CNN and even entertainment networks are doing everything in their power to ensure a Clinton victory. Look no further than to Wolf Blitzer mincing around and drinking wine at the Democratic convention, celebrating Hillary’s nomination. But the propaganda skewing this election runs much deeper than just the media: our iPhones, iPads, social media networks, Google and even video games are all in the tank for Hillary Clinton—and it’s chilling.

Crokin explains how Trump media is rejected or stigmatized as “explicit” while left-leaning podcasts are allowed to dominate. “Of all the channels listed in the Apple News politics section, only two of the 16 arguably lean right—the rest are reliably left-wing,” she writes.

This should not come as a surprise: Apple CEO Tim Cook is an avid Clinton supporter. Team Clinton hired Google’s Eric Schmidt to kickstart a company providing consulting services for the candidate.

“While Schmidt has said that he would not work in a Clinton administration, he does support her presidential campaign. Google also has a number of close ties to the Obama administration, with a number of former employees serving in top positions, from U.S. Chief Technology Officer Megan Smith to the head of the U.S. Patent Office, Michelle Lee. The chief technology officer of Clinton’s campaign, Stephanie Hannon, was also hired from Google,” writes Alexander Howard for The Huffington Post.

Google also stands accused of rigging search criteria to show Clinton in a favorable light.

“Twitter is another culprit,” notes Crokin. “The company has gotten a lot of slack for banning conservatives and Trump supporters such as Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos and, most recently, rapper Azealia Banks after she came out in support of Trump. Twitter has provided vague answers as to why conservative voices have been banned while they’ve allowed other users to call for the killing of cops.”

On Thursday it was revealed Twitter CEO Dick Costolo “secretly ordered employees to filter out abusive and hateful replies to President Barack Obama during a Q&A session,” according to BuzzFeed.

Moreover, founders of popular pro-Trump Twitter handles accuse the corporation of censoring their content.

Instagram pulls down accounts criticizing Clinton. “In June, a conservative comedy group called Toughen Up America was banned with no warning or explanation. Last week, the popular Australian-based graffiti artist, Lushsux, was banned from Instagram after he posted photos of a bikini-clad Clinton mural he painted.”

Facebook faced criticism after Sen. John Thune sent a letter to CEO Mark Zuckerberg asking him to explain why conservative posts were taken down while those for Black Lives Matter promoted.

Facebook is said to be a product of the CIA’s tech investment operation, In-Q-Tel.

“The publicly available record on the Facebook/In-Q-Tel connection is tenuous,” writes The Corbett Report. “Facebook received $12.7 million in venture capital from Accel, whose manager, James Breyer, now sits on their board. He was formerly the chairman of the National Venture Capital Association, whose board included Gilman Louie, then the CEO of In-Q-Tel. The connection is indirect, but the suggestion of CIA involvement with Facebook, however tangential, is disturbing in the light of Facebook’s history of violating the privacy of its users.

Google’s connection to In-Q-Tel is more straightforward, if officially denied. In 2006, ex-CIA officer Robert David Steele told Homeland Security Today that Google “has been taking money and direction for elements of the US Intelligence Community, including the Office of Research and Development at the Central Intelligence Agency, In-Q-Tel, and in all probability, both the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Army’s Intelligence and Security Command.” Later that year, a blogger claimed that an official Google spokesman had denied the claims, but no official press statement was released.

Hillary Clinton is the obvious choice for the establishment, its national security state, the military industrial complex, and the surveillance apparatus that relies on tech companies, especially Facebook.

Sources:

Observer.com
HuffingtonPost.com
BuzzFeed.com
CorbettReport.com

Editorial-Use-Donald-Trump-Ivanka

Junk food-damaged Michael Moore calls for Ivanka Trump to convince her dad to step down

Filmmaker Michael Moore has told Ivanka Trump her father needs to end his presidential campaign.

The Oscar-winning director made news in December when he stood outside the Trump Tower in New York with a placard proclaiming “We are all Muslim.” Moore also penned an open letter at the time.

“Fortunately, Donald, you and your supporters no longer look like what America actually is today,” Moore wrote. “We are not a country of angry white guys. Here’s a statistic that is going to make your hair spin: Eighty-one percent of the electorate who will pick the president next year are either female, people of color, or young people between the ages of 18 and 35. In other words, not you. And not the people who want you leading their country.”

In yet another open letter posted on August 10 on the liberal Alternet website, Moore tells Trump’s daughter she must convince him to shut down his campaign.

“I’m writing to you because your dad is not well,” Moore begins. “Every day he continues his spiral downward—and after his call for gun owners to commit acts of violence against Mrs. Clinton, it is clear he needs help, serious help. His comments and behavior have become more and more bizarre and detached from reality. He is in need of an intervention. And I believe only you can conduct it.”

Trump’s supposed call for gun owners to murder Clinton is a classic case of the establishment media taking comments out of context for the sake of political gain. After the Clinton campaign distorted the statement and the Secret Service talked with Trump about the remark in support of the Second Amendment, Donald Trump posted a tweet and his campaign issued a formal statement.

“It’s called the power of unification—2nd Amendment people have amazing spirit and are tremendously unified, which gives them great political power,” Jason Miller, a Trump aide, said in the statement.

“And this year, they will be voting in record numbers, and it won’t be for Hillary Clinton, it will be for Donald Trump.”

It should come as no surprise Moore would disingenuously attack Trump on the Second Amendment. He established himself as a leader of the anti-Second Amendment movement when he released his 2002 film Bowling for Columbine. In the film, he verbally attacked the late actor and president of the National Rifle Association, Charlton Heston.

In the open letter Moore provides Ivanka with a script she can recite to convince her father to step aside and seek psychiatric help. It is peppered with the sarcastic remarks Moore is known for.

“Ivanka, I have faith in you that you can do this,” Moore concludes. “I know I’ve called your dad crazy before, but I was speaking politically, not clinically. This has gone beyond crazy. The entire nation—in fact, the entire world—needs you to step forward and do the courageous thing history will praise you for: the loving act of a brilliant daughter who also loved her beleaguered country enough to say her father wasn’t well and needed help.”

Moore has not posted an open letter to Hillary Clinton despite her documented health issues and anger management problem, the latter demonstrated when she testified before Congress on Benghazi.

In 2008 Moore told Larry King he was “morally prohibited from voting for Hillary in the primaries because of her war votes, I mean that not as a personal attack against her, but I simply can’t side with somebody who participated, whether willingly or unknowingly, as she claims, in something that has been so evil.”

Despite this aversion to Clinton, in January Moore admitted a “forbidden love” for the former secretary of state. After fawning over Bernie Sanders, Moore told Chris Hayes of MSNBC although “I have obviously many disagreements with Hillary about her vote on the war and her relationship with Wall Street, whatever,” he has “always really liked her, and not just in a—in a forbidden way.”

Moore further admitted his admiration for the Clintons. “Obviously, my politics line up very closely with Bernie’s. But we have a historic moment where we could elect the first woman president of the United States. And you know, I got invited to the White House by the Clintons back in the day. And they were really nice to me. And I got to eat whatever I wanted to eat. It was all very friendly… We were going through the reception line. And Bill goes ‘I’m your number one fan.’ She grabbed his hand and goes ‘No, I’m your number one fan.’ They’re great.”

Moore expressed his admiration years after Bill Clinton demonstrated his capacity as a warmonger, illegally bombing Yugoslavia, a medical facility in Sudan, and launching cruise missiles into Baghdad, killing a number of civilians, including the renowned artist Layla al-Attar. Moore has not spoken a word about Bill Clinton’s murderous sanctions that ultimately killed 500,000 Iraqi children.

Michael Moore is a throughly modern Democrat. He champions social issues, attacks the cornerstone of the Constitution, and downplays the war crimes of the Clintons and Obama.

Moore may consider Donald Trump insane. However, the billionaire presidential candidate had nothing to do with killing 30,000 Libyans, the US policy in Syria responsible for the murder of 500,000 Syrians, and orchestrating a coup in Honduras.

An intervention is required in the case of Hillary Clinton.

Hopefully, the American people will do it in November.

MichaelMoore.com

Alternet.org

TheHill.com

TheHuffingtonPost.com

Mediaite.com

NYTimes.com

FPIF.org

CounterPunch.org

Donald Trump

Trump sends warning on possible ‘rigged’ election, after repetitive establishment attacks

Donald Trump is one of the most polarizing figures in the history of American politics.

Establishment democrats and republicans alike have been doing everything in their power to prevent him from receiving any positive recognition or attention. They clearly — occasionally admittedly — fear the man because they know that a shocking amount of American people are behind him. He could very well be the next President of the United States.

Trump supporters believe that the democrats are trying to sabotage his campaign by spreading lies and skewing polls. The Donald himself seems to agree with his fans.

During a recent speech in Columbus, Ohio, Trump stated, “I’m afraid the election is going to be rigged, I have to be honest.” Citing previous examples of democratic corruption, Trump’s comment was met with much criticism from the mainstream media, who wrote his statement off as him being a sore loser — well in advance of the election results.

Trump’s suggestion isn’t all that crazy, though. After all, it’s been completely proven that the Democratic National Committee conspired against Bernie Sanders in order to ensure a victory for Hillary Clinton. So why is the concept of them conspiring against Donald Trump — a man who isn’t even in their party — so hard to believe?

Sure, it’d be substantially more difficult to rig a presidential election than a primary, but corruption runs deep in American politics.

Should it be proven that the 2016 elections were rigged in favor of Hillary, American society could very well collapse into chaos. There would be such a powerful outrage among American citizens that the entire country could feel the devastation.

Most people know that the political game is filled with deception, but should they discover that they have been played for fools; should they discover that none of their votes mattered in the end, a legitimate revolution could begin on American soil. The people have felt like their voices don’t matter for many, many years now. If Trump is cheated out of a fair victory, that could be the final straw.

 

Sources:

Infowars.com

RealClearPolitics.com

Hillary Clinton

Clinton campaign now trying to ban anti-Clinton ads on television

In the unfortunate and horrific event that Hillary Clinton is elected as the next President of the United States, there is an abundance of freedoms and liberties that the American people will have to fear her trampling all over in an attempt to push her authoritarian agendas. However, the one that has already been under attack is the freedom of speech, which the Clinton campaign targeted immediately.

According to the New York Post, the Clinton campaign has been attempting to strong-arm television networks into refusing to air a Donald Trump advertisement that “claims Clinton went to India and talked up outsourcing — and then received a donation from Indian politician Amar Singh of up to $5 million in 2008.”

The leftists claim that they want the ad taken down because it’s factually incorrect. According the Clinton gang, Singh did, in fact, donate $5 million to Hillary, but it wasn’t in 2008. Instead, the donation was given in a different year. They seem to not realize that they date isn’t the problem — it’s that the event took place in general.

While most of Trump and Clinton’s battles have been fought over Twitter, they’ve been going back and forth in television advertisements over the past few weeks. Trump, clearly recognizing the value and tenants of the First Amendment, isn’t demanding that Clinton remove her ads that attack his character. No, only Crooked Hillary demands that…

This shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, though. Hillary Clinton’s laundry list of scandals, corruption and generally horrible political history gives the likes of Trump lots of ground to cover when it comes to attack ads. If her goal is to censor and silence everyone who speaks out against her awfulness, she’s going to need a lot of help — because there are a lot of us out there.

You can watch the ad below and share it around to help expose the truth and support free speech.

 

 

Sources:

NYPost.com

IAgreeToSee.com