ArchiveArchive

Vaccine pushers who promote mercury injections into children are “medical child molesters,” warns heavy metals expert

January 13, 2017 by Mike Adams Leave a Comment

On top of all the sicko pedophilia and child trafficking going on in America, there’s also the vaccine industry: A cartel of toxic mercury pushers whose denial of the periodic table of elements (yes, they are science deniers) turns them into “medical child molesters” as they demand more and more children be injected with toxic mercury, a known neurotoxin and potent heavy metal that causes brain damage.

As any genuine scientist or chemist knows, there is no such thing as a safe quantity or safe form of mercury for injecting into children. The continued advocacy of vaccines containing mercury — which continue to be pushed onto children and pregnant women all across America — is a crime against children and a gross violation of the American Medical Association’s code of medical ethics. (RELATED: Read more news about modern medicine’s ethical failures at Medicine.news)

As the lab science director of an internationally accredited heavy metals laboratory — CWClabs.com — I’ve personally tested vaccines for their mercury content, and I know more about heavy metals than most vaccine pushers will ever learn in their lives. (I wrote an Amazon.com #1 Science book on heavy metals in food called Food Forensics.) The simple truth is that mercury is a potent neurotoxin and it’s still being deliberately used in vaccines injected into infants, children and pregnant women all across America.

Mercury in vaccines is “chemical violence” against children

That’s a “chemical assault” and a form of violence against children. That’s why I’ve decided to start calling it “medical child molestation.” Hear my podcast below for more discussion. This means that medical hacks and vaccine propagandists like Dr. David Gorski and Calif. state Sen. Richard Pan are openly advocating a form of medical violence against children. Meanwhile, people like myself (the Health Ranger) are routinely vilified in the pharma-controlled media for practicing good science and working to protect children from a known neurotoxin. (Coming soon: News on Thimerosal at Thimerosal.news)

“There is no debate that mercury in any form is toxic. Scientists may debate the differences in toxicity between different forms of mercury, such as ethylmercury (which is an ingredient in Thimerosal) or methylmercury (from fish). But all would agree that mercury is a potent neurotoxin.” – Mark Hyman, M.D.

“The continued use of mercury, a known neurotoxin, raises particular concern for populations that are most vulnerable to neurodevelopmental harms, mainly a fetus in utero, infants, young children and the aged. When we speak of the health and safety of our children, our future generation, we speak of a societal responsibility, which we are privileged to bear… Many of the CDC’s own studies have demonstrated a link between increased Thimerosal exposures and the development of vocal and motor tics, which are generally recognized as autismlike features. This alarming association has been downplayed to the public.” — US Congressman Bill Posey

“That mercury is toxic cannot be disputed. To say otherwise is to pick a fight with the periodic table and the fundamental principles of physical chemistry. Consider the organization of electrons in atoms. Mercury is a large, heavy atom with more orbitals than lighter metals, like copper or zinc, and has a greater capacity to pick up and exchange electrons. …Mercury is thus a metabolic poison because it can insinuate itself into situations where it doesn’t belong.” – Martha R. Herbert, PhD, MD

“There is a broad consensus among research scientists that Thimerosal is a dangerous neurotoxin that should be immediately removed from medicines. Several hundred peer-reviewed scientific publications by the world’s leading research scientists, public health agencies, universities, and teaching hospitals have confirmed that Thimerosal is a potent neurotoxin that has never been proven safe for medical use and for which cost-effective alternatives exist.” – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. from his book Thimerosal – Let the Science Speak: The Evidence Supporting the Immediate Removal of Mercury – a Known Neurotoxin – from Vaccines.

Listen to my full podcast on Thimerosal, vaccines and the “medical child molesters” who push them

Hear the full podcast at my Health Ranger Report website, or listen below, and be sure to check Vaccines.news daily for more breaking news about vaccines.

New studies once again link mercury to autism

December 15, 2016 by JD Heyes Leave a Comment

Even though the federal government’s health care bureaucracy, Big Pharma and the vaccine industry refuse to admit it, yet another study has linked mercury (still found in some vaccines) with autism.

As reported in EcoWatch by Robert Kennedy, Jr., a pair of international research teams, including Egyptian scientists have validated the link between autism and mercury. In an article published in the journal Metabolic Brain Disease, a team of nine research scientists from top Egyptian universities and academic medical institutions have now confirmed the causal role of mercury as a leading cause of autism.

The researchers determined the degree of mercury poisoning in children by analyzing the excretion in urine of organic elements called porphyrins. These are biomarkers that indicate the toxicity level of mercury, Kennedy wrote.

In addition, the researchers measured levels of mercury and lead in the blood.

‘Half-dozen’ U.S. studies have also shown a link

The teams found a substantial relationship between autism and mercury toxicity, as well as a direct correlation between the levels of mercury toxicity and the presence and severity of autism symptoms.

Kennedy noted further:

The scientists studied 100 children; 40 with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), 40 healthy individuals and 20 healthy siblings of ASD children. The results showed that the children with ASD had significantly higher mercury levels than healthy children and healthy siblings. Children with the highest mercury levels had the most severe autism symptoms.

He went on to write that at least a half-dozen U.S. studies have also found a link between the development of autism and exposure to mercury, as determined by measuring porphyrins in urine. The first study, which was completed in 2012, found a correlation between the presence of specific urinary porphyrins linked to mercury toxicity and autism. That study affirmed an earlier one in 2011 that determined specific porphyrins associated with mercury toxicity were much higher in ASD kids when compared to non-autistic controls, Kennedy noted.

Further, a study in 2010 also found “disordered porphyrin metabolism” in autistic children that was not found in non-autistic kids, once more suggesting a higher mercury toxicity that is associated with autism and ASD – autism spectrum disorder.

A second study, which was also published in Metabolic Brain Disease (June 2016), an international team consisting of researchers and physicians from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Norway and Chile used a different set of measurements to identify a direct link between levels of mercury in the body and the diagnosis of autism.

The team measured levels of neurokinin A and B—these are pro-inflammatory neuro peptides that help identify mercury in blood—in 84 children with ASD, along with 84 controls. Researchers found a positive relationship between the severity of autism symptoms and the levels of mercury in the blood.

Kennedy explained that many mothers of children in the first Egyptian study had several dental amalgams which some believe likely helped create elevated levels of mercury in their kids. But that study did not analyze any potential link between higher incidences of autism and thimerosal, a vaccine preservative, which is 50 percent ethyl mercury by weight. But other studies have noted that thimerosal is 50 times more toxic to human tissue than the methylmercury in amalgams and fish, according to this 2012 study, and twice as prevalent, at a minimum, in the brain.

Even the FDA has admitted the link

It should be noted again that these two studies are only the latest in a growing body of research that link autism and mercury. In fact, as Natural News founder and editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, reported in March, the Food and Drug Administration’s own website admits openly that vaccines lead to autism.

Adams noted that the document—which is a really a product insert for the Tripedia vaccine—openly admits to the vaccine being linked to “idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea.”

Adams also produced a video explaining his findings, here.

Sources:

EcoWatch.com

NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov

NaturalNews.com

Will President Trump dismantle dangerous vaccine mandates that harm children across America?

December 9, 2016 by Robert Jonathan Leave a Comment

When it comes to vaccine mandates, it remains to be seen if President-elect Donald Trump’s vow to make America great again also includes making America healthy again. In short, will he use the power of his office to try to protect heath freedom by reining in mandatory inoculations?

If so, it will require some serious swamp draining. The entire institutionalized regulatory establishment in the form of The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and its and international and state counterparts are aggressive proponents of mandatory vaccination, including a no-exception policy for families.

Abolishing vaccine mandates could be on the Trump agenda. As far as health-related reforms, however, the repeal and replace of Obamacare (otherwise known as the profoundly misnamed Affordable Care Act) is expected to be one of the first orders of business for Trump and the Congress. That will require some heavy lifting.

If you dislike your vaccine, do you have to keep it?

Even raising the possibility of the toxic side effects, and/or merely having an open mind about vaccines, has prompted outrage (faux or otherwise) from the media and its approved array of experts, perhaps because of the all advertising money it rakes in from Big Pharma. According to the media echo chamber, no scientific evidence exists that vaccines, for example, cause autism.

You may recall during the September 16, 2015, nationally televised GOP presidential debate that CNN tried to push Trump into the full-on anti-vaxxer camp. Citing the example of an employee whose vaccinated newborn wound up with autism, Trump mentioned that doses should be administered over a two- or three-year period rather than all at once.

To the horror of the conventional-wisdom-obsessed media (the same folks who assured the U.S. and the world that Hillary Clinton was a lock to win the presidency), then-candidates Ben Carson and Rand Paul, both of whom are medical doctors, agreed with Trump on the same national stage that vaccinations should be given incrementally.

Even Green Party candidate Jill Stein of recount fame, an MD herself, had to backpedal furiously in August after seemingly equivocating on vaccine safety.

Democrat Hillary Clinton, the recipient of more campaign donations from drug companies than any other candidate in the 2016 election cycle, is an advocate of mandatory vaccinations.

Over the years, Trump’s Twitter feed raised questions about how vaccinations are administered by the medical community. “I’m not against vaccinations for your children, I’m against them in 1 massive dose. Spread them out over a period of time & autism will drop!” he tweeted in September 2014.

A 1905 U.S. Supreme Court case, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, established the legal precedent for mandatory vaccinations, when a Cambridge clergyman unsuccessfully objected to a law that required him to get a second smallpox vaccination after a bad reaction the first time around. Reasonable health regulations generally fall under the so-called police power of the government, in which courts tend to give substantial deference. “It is within the police power of a State to enact a compulsory vaccination law, and it is for the legislature, and not for the courts, to determine…The matured opinions of medical men everywhere, and the experience of mankind, as all must know, negative the suggestion that it is not possible in any case to determine whether vaccination is safe,” the majority opinion declared.

Because of the untimely death of Justice Scalia, one vacancy exists on the Supreme Court, which is split 4-4 (roughly) between conservatives and liberals. It will be interesting to see if Trump nominates a health freedom supporter from among the 21 potential picks that he released during the campaign and thereby perhaps revisit the 100-plus year old ruling.

Sources:

NVIC.org

Supreme.Justia.com

The CDC and media have hidden the vaccine injury court to downplay vaccine damage

December 8, 2016 by Vicki Batts Leave a Comment

Many people have never even heard of the “Vaccine Court” – the nickname given to the Vaccine Claims/Office of Special Masters. It’s not so much a court as it is a federal program. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was established as a no-fault compensation program in 1988.

Under this program, petitions for compensation for injuries incurred by compulsory childhood vaccinations may be presented. Per the organization’s website, Congress supposedly intended for this vaccine compensation program to make it easier to obtain compensation for vaccine damages, rather than having to go through traditional litigation procedures. The “court” you see, is merely a board of eight Special Masters that are appointed to serve four-year terms; they aren’t even elected officials. Rather than appear before a court with a jury of your peers, you instead present your case to a group of appointed bureaucrats.

You can see where things began to go awry, can’t you?

It is this Office of Special Masters that is charged with paying out millions in damages to vaccine-damaged people and their families. The statute of limitations is just three years from the time symptoms begin after the administration of a vaccine. In the instance of death, that window is shortened to a mere two years. When parents are forced to make their case against government attorneys in a government-owned courtroom, how can anyone truly feel that justice is being served?

As Natural Blaze points out, usually when a product fails, the onus is on the manufacturer to prove it wasn’t at fault. However, in Vaccine Court, it is up to the families of the injured to prove a connection between cause and effect. Since diagnostic criteria laid out by the American Psychiatric Association has changed several times over the years, proving such a connection can be quite difficult. It can take anywhere from two to 10 years for Vaccine Court cases to reach a resolution; because of this, recipients of financial compensation really only represent a small fraction of the number of people who have been harmed by vaccines.

Since 1989, roughly $3 billion has been paid out to families, and more than $120 million has been paid out to cover legal fees and attorney costs. All financial restitution is funded by an excise tax on vaccines placed on every dose of vaccine set by the CDC, and paid for by the taxpayer (i.e., the injured party). So, rather than forcing Big Pharma to pay for the damage they cause, that cost is then levied onto taxpayers. When you or your insurance company pays for a vaccine, you are also paying for the compensation program.

Many people do not even know that they can report vaccine injuries through the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), nor that they can file for financial compensation. The VAERS website itself admits that there are many shortcomings to its passive reporting system, including “the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events.” Some estimates indicate that the under-reporting to VAERS is so dramatic that the system really only represents about 1 percent of all vaccine-related adverse events.

The reliance on such a passive and poorly managed system makes it relatively useless for obtaining any kind of real data on the frequency of vaccine injuries. The VAERS website itself notes infants’ risk of certain medical issues, including high fevers, seizures and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The website then claims, “Some infants will experience these medical events shortly after a vaccination by coincidence.” The website also notes that their data contains both “coincidental events” and “those truly caused by vaccines.”

There is a desperate lack of real information on vaccine safety and the frequency of vaccine damage. The mainstream media remains totally complicit in this by dismissing the legitimacy of vaccine damage – and defaming anyone who dares to question vaccine safety.

Together, these institutions prevent the American public from ever knowing the truth about the harm vaccines can cause. They protect vaccine manufacturers at a terrible cost to the people of this country – not just in dollars, but by the sheer volume of people affected by vaccine injury.

Sources:

NaturalBlaze.com

USCFC.USCourts.gov

VAERS.HHS.gov

Citizens against vaccination will be among the first groups targeted by FEMA camps in America

October 11, 2016 by Vicki Batts Leave a Comment

Are government agencies conspiring to imprison those who do not conform to their demands? The CDC’s newest proposal surely seems to indicate that the agency has grown a bit too big for their britches, if you will. Their recent Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) declared that the agency would be amending their current domestic and foreign quarantine regulations.

Within these regulations, the CDC has essentially given itself the power to detain individuals by declaring that they are “reasonably believed to be infected” with a communicable disease that is at a “qualifying stage.” In other words, the CDC can now claim you are incubating or carrying a certain disease, and then quarantine you at will. Yes, a government agency has granted itself the power to to do whatever it wants, and whatever it needs to do in order to enforce and obtain strict compliance with their beliefs.

Throughout the massive document that is their NPRM, there are several instances of these “amendments” out and out violating the rights of the American people, and possible routes to target those who do not conform to vaccination standards. It seems as though the government truly believes that as long as they present their sheer tyranny under the guise of public good, it will be blindly accepted by the rest of us. For example, this contingency outlined by the CDC is a blatant depiction of their authoritarian aspirations:

“CDC may enter into an agreement with an individual, upon such terms as the CDC considers to be reasonably necessary, indicating that the individual consents to any of the public health measures authorized under this part, including quarantine, isolation, conditional release, medical examination, hospitalization, vaccination, and treatment; provided that the individual’s consent shall not be considered as a prerequisite to any exercise of any authority under this part.” [VB emphasis added]

Now, is it really “entering an agreement” if the individual’s consent is not a “prerequisite” for the agency to conduct any of the above actions? Those kinds of words suggest that we are not entering any kind of agreement at all; we are entering a police state.

With just those words, the CDC is granting itself the right to detain, isolate, examine, vaccinate and “treat” whoever they want in their FEMA camps, without any kind of consent from free-thinking and otherwise law-abiding citizens. There are, however, many other “agreements” and stipulations throughout the document that are equally concerning. Regardless, provisions such as this will pave the way for the CDC to round-up unvaccinated individuals and force them to receive immunizations. After all, according to their propaganda, those of us who abstain from their toxic jabs are the biggest vectors for disease. Rubella, pertussis and other diseases that have vaccines formulated for them are on the CDC’s list for concerning conditions. What do you really think is going to happen when their new “regulations” take effect?

The CDC has set out to grow its power as an agency, and what could be a better way to do that than through tyrannous self-aggrandizement?

Sources:

TheCommonSenseShow.com

FederalRegister.gov

ActivistPost.com

American Medical Association opposes mandatory vaccines

August 25, 2016 by D. Samuelson Leave a Comment

At first this headline appears to be good news, indicating that the American Medical Association (AMA) has finally woken up to the medical tyranny of mandatory vaccines. Unfortunately, as is the case with so many institutions, while the AMA’s guiding principles originally include detailed support of informed consent, their modern-day practice is far removed from those moral foundations.

The Health Ranger reports, “A mandatory vaccination policy — forced vaccination of unwilling recipients — is, by definition, a medical intervention carried out without the consent of the patient or the patient’s parents. This directly violates the very clear language in the Informed Consent section of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics which states:

The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment… Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is imminent.”

When was the last time your doctor handed you a sheet that detailed the toxic combination of ingredients in your children’s vaccine? Were you fully informed before you gave your consent? What about the terrifying increase in medical kidnapping, where children are taken from parents who have the audacity to question their physician, or even dare to suggest alternative medicine? Why should you or the AMA follow dictates of government health officials or media talking heads who intimidate and coerce people into a treatment they do not want?

As Natural News stated, “If the AMA does not immediately denounce the widespread vaccine violations of its own Code of Ethics, then what medical ethics does the AMA actually stand for, if any? Are there any limits to the coercion tactics doctors may use against patients to force them into medical treatments demanded by doctors?”

Sources:

Science.NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

Top government scientists refuse to vaccinate their children

August 19, 2016 by Vicki Batts Leave a Comment

How shocking is it that New Mexico, the school district with the highest percentage of students whose families are opting out of vaccines, is actually one of the state’s most scientifically literate communities?

Well, if you know how harmful vaccines really are, you might not really be all that surprised. But for many, the 2.3 percent of students forgoing traditional vaccine regimens in Los Alamos is causing quite the upset. After all, many of the parents in the community work for US Los Alamos Labs, or one of the other scientific organizations that call the area home. For example, the Los Alamos National Laboratory has even conducted extensive research and development on a vaccine for HIV.

The Superintendent of the Los Alamos school systems has said that he finds the high rate of parents exempting their children from vaccination “curious,” given that it is a “pretty scientific and literate community.”

While the mainstream media continues to come up with all kinds of wild reasons for why “anti-vaxxers” don’t vaccinate their children, a community of scientists continues to abstain from the practice, much to the chagrin of pro-vaccine activists. Los Alamos is not alone; Santa Fe’s percentage of children not getting jabbed was just a few points behind, at 2.1 percent.

Anna Pentler, the head of the New Mexico Immunization Coalition (a pro-vaccine group) seems to think that not wanting to inject their children with toxic adjuvants and heavy metals is an “emotional issue,” and not an issue of ethics and morality. She says that while the science could be “99 to 1″ in favor of vaccines, a parent’s anecdotal story of how vaccines harmed their child could easily sway another parent’s opinion.

While it is true that the countless horror stories that many parents and children are forced to endure post-vaccination are enough to give any reasonable parent pause, the fact is that the science behind vaccine damage is also all there. The problem is that no one wants to believe it; no one wants their reality disrupted.

As the Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute states, “[T]here is a large body of scientific evidence confirming numerous vaccine safety deficits that counteract well-publicized benefits. For example, several studies show that thimerosal (mercury) and aluminum in vaccines can cause neurological, immunological and developmental harm.”

The CDC itself has conducted investigations on the harmful effects of certain ingredients in vaccines, and found that they did in fact disrupt neurological development in young children. But the mainstream media doesn’t care about that; they want you to fall in line and do your “due diligence” by getting vaccinated to maintain society’s “herd immunity” – which isn’t even real, by the way.

The vaccine agenda is one based on smoke and mirrors; its all a ruse to hide the harmful effects of vaccines that are felt worldwide. And it seems that the scientists in Los Alamos are brave enough to go against the grain, rather than putting their children in harm’s way just to satisfy society.

Sources:

AbqJournal.com

NaturalNews.com

Info.CMSRI.org

Vaccines can cause autism, according to many studies

August 15, 2016 by Vicki Batts Leave a Comment

How many studies will it take to prove that vaccines cause autism? Well, it doesn’t seem to matter how many there are, really. No matter how many studies there are that prove the connection between autism and vaccines, the media will never allow such divisive information to reach the masses. Pundits, celebrities and conventional medicine practitioners across the country insist that the vaccine debate is over, and that anyone who dares to suggest that getting jabbed is dangerous is an “anti-science” loon.

But what if it is really these people – who are really more like puppets – that are crazy? After all, is it not fear mongering to say that without vaccines people will get sick? Is it not anti-science to deny a mountain of evidence and disregard it as “inconsequential,” merely because it causes you to question your own views?

An in-depth review by Arjun Walia from Activist Post has revealed that at least 22 studies have found that there is a link between vaccination and the onset of autism. And there are plenty more studies out there with similar findings.

A 2002 study that was published in the Journal of Biomedical Sciences observed a casual relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism, but specifically with the measles portion of the vaccine. The researchers, who were from Utah State University, concluded that in some children the MMR vaccine may cause an abnormal measles infection. This in turn can lead to neurological problems that would be considered part of the autism spectrum.

The journal Entropy also featured a study in 2012 that showcased a much stronger correlation between the MMR vaccine and autism. In this case, the study found that aluminum was what was causing the vaccine to be harmful. The study authors wrote in their abstract that vaccines that contain aluminum are often toxic to children, and can potentially lead to a later diagnosis of autism. Very low serum levels of sulfate and glutathione are often seen in these cases. Basically, the aluminum that’s found in a variety of vaccines appears to provoke the onset of autism.

Walia writes in his report that there are a “number of studies that link vaccines to a possible autism connection,” and notes that across the globe a number of courts have ruled in favor of vaccines causing a multitude of side effects, including autism and brain damage. The MMR vaccine is really just one of many.

Besides aluminum, there is a whole host of other toxic materials that can be added to vaccines. Thimerosal, the toxic mercury derivative, is an example of one of the many problematic materials added to vaccines. Several studies in Walia’s report suggest that despite modern medicine’s insistence that it is totally safe, thimerosal is also a dangerous ingredient. There are many other types of adjuvants and preservatives used in vaccines that can be harmful.

Sources:

NaturalNews.com

ActivistPost.com

Flu deaths keep mounting in people vaccinated against the flu

August 15, 2016 by D. Samuelson Leave a Comment

A death from the flu shot might appear on your local media, like it did in 2015, for Katherine McQuestion, a 26-year-old healthcare worker from Wisconsin.

Of course, the media makes sure an uneducated stooge from the health department gets on TV to say, well, yes, that’s just an aberration that the person died. But it’s not.

The flu vaccine is the most dangerous vaccine in the U.S.

Health Impact News reports, “Once every 3 months the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines meets and the DOJ issues a report of cases settled for vaccine injuries and deaths . . from 8/16/15 to 11/15/15 there were 150 cases adjudicated . . .63 of the 84 cases were for injuries and deaths from the flu vaccine, making the flu vaccine the most dangerous vaccine in the U.S., harming and killing more people than all the other vaccines put together.”

The people that are dying were healthy, happy people before the flu shot.

Natural News writes, “Chad Rattray, a 37-year-old . . . from Spokane, Washington . . . followed the advice of health authorities in getting a flu shot. Instead, he fell deathly ill. [Then, he] died from the flu.

“. . . Five -year-old Kiera Driscoll . . . died from cardiac arrest due to influenza A. Kiera had recently gotten a flu shot as well, and after developing a severe cough and fever was rushed to a clinic and given steroids and put on a nebulizer. . . Kiera died of the very same flu strain for which she was vaccinated.

“. . .Fourteen-year-old Amber Grey, like the others, is reported to have been in optimal health prior to the jab. Like Kiera, Amber tested positive for influenza A. Prior to her death, the same strain was found in the flu vaccine. She suffered a severe bacterial infection and pneumonia in the days prior to her passing.”

Sources:

YouTube.com

HealthImpactNews.com

NaturalNews.com

Science.NaturalNews.com

Schools shamelessly promote GMOs, vaccines to children

August 1, 2016 by Vicki Batts Leave a Comment

Though disheartening, it is truly no surprise that Big Biotech has managed to introduce their propaganda into public school systems. Who better to prey upon than children? By forcing their agenda on young, impressionable minds, they can ensure a future where the safety of their products and practices goes unquestioned.

A screenshot from one student’s homework assignment revealed the question, “Are genetically modified foods safe to eat?”

As Natural News reports, the assignment also asked, “Do you hate going to the doctor for shots?” as well as, “What if you could eat a banana instead?” Natural News went on to report, “Through a process called genetic modification, scientists are creating foods that contain human vaccines as well as extra vitamins and minerals.”

So it would seem that in addition to brainwashing children, Big Biotech also wants to pick your child’s brain for product development. Pretty soon, school lunches might very well be accompanied by daily vaccines, in the form of a banana.

Also included in the worksheet is a lovely explanation about how scientists have made food “better” for us. Indeed, genetic modification is revered throughout the assignment, cited as being able to increase the positive traits within a food, while decreasing negative ones. This kind of thinking inherently assumes that nature can actually be “perfected” by human intervention somehow. The state that our planet is currently in should certainly suggest this ideation is not based on reality — human intervention has all but destroyed the earth.

There are severe environmental impacts associated with the cultivation of GMO crops. The use of destructive pesticides and herbicides, such as Roundup, is particularly concerning. The World Health Organization recently declared the main ingredient in Roundup, glyphosate, a probably carcinogen.

GMOs in and of themselves may be toxic to the environment and surrounding organisms as well. Non-target creatures such as bees, butterflies and birds are often harmed by these GM crops and their chemical counterparts. The use of harsh herbicides and pesticides often result in the growth and spread of superbugs and superweeds that can withstand the chemical abuse. Concerns about GM crops’ effects on biodiversity are also well-founded. GM crops often replace heritage seeds and are planted in a mono-crop fashion. Mono-cropping leads to the destruction of what was once good soil, leaving it devoid of essential nutrients for plant life.

To put it simply, GMOs are really anything but safe for the planet. It is shameful that these ideas are being foisted upon children to further immoral, corporate agendas. The best way to rebel against Big Biotech is to begin growing your own organic food with natural, GMO-free seeds.

Sources:

NaturalNews.com

OneGreenPlanet.org