ArchiveArchive
Baby-Vaccine-Shot-2

The CDC and media have hidden the vaccine injury court to downplay vaccine damage

Many people have never even heard of the “Vaccine Court” – the nickname given to the Vaccine Claims/Office of Special Masters. It’s not so much a court as it is a federal program. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was established as a no-fault compensation program in 1988.

Under this program, petitions for compensation for injuries incurred by compulsory childhood vaccinations may be presented. Per the organization’s website, Congress supposedly intended for this vaccine compensation program to make it easier to obtain compensation for vaccine damages, rather than having to go through traditional litigation procedures. The “court” you see, is merely a board of eight Special Masters that are appointed to serve four-year terms; they aren’t even elected officials. Rather than appear before a court with a jury of your peers, you instead present your case to a group of appointed bureaucrats.

You can see where things began to go awry, can’t you?

It is this Office of Special Masters that is charged with paying out millions in damages to vaccine-damaged people and their families. The statute of limitations is just three years from the time symptoms begin after the administration of a vaccine. In the instance of death, that window is shortened to a mere two years. When parents are forced to make their case against government attorneys in a government-owned courtroom, how can anyone truly feel that justice is being served?

As Natural Blaze points out, usually when a product fails, the onus is on the manufacturer to prove it wasn’t at fault. However, in Vaccine Court, it is up to the families of the injured to prove a connection between cause and effect. Since diagnostic criteria laid out by the American Psychiatric Association has changed several times over the years, proving such a connection can be quite difficult. It can take anywhere from two to 10 years for Vaccine Court cases to reach a resolution; because of this, recipients of financial compensation really only represent a small fraction of the number of people who have been harmed by vaccines.

Since 1989, roughly $3 billion has been paid out to families, and more than $120 million has been paid out to cover legal fees and attorney costs. All financial restitution is funded by an excise tax on vaccines placed on every dose of vaccine set by the CDC, and paid for by the taxpayer (i.e., the injured party). So, rather than forcing Big Pharma to pay for the damage they cause, that cost is then levied onto taxpayers. When you or your insurance company pays for a vaccine, you are also paying for the compensation program.

Many people do not even know that they can report vaccine injuries through the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), nor that they can file for financial compensation. The VAERS website itself admits that there are many shortcomings to its passive reporting system, including “the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events.” Some estimates indicate that the under-reporting to VAERS is so dramatic that the system really only represents about 1 percent of all vaccine-related adverse events.

The reliance on such a passive and poorly managed system makes it relatively useless for obtaining any kind of real data on the frequency of vaccine injuries. The VAERS website itself notes infants’ risk of certain medical issues, including high fevers, seizures and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The website then claims, “Some infants will experience these medical events shortly after a vaccination by coincidence.” The website also notes that their data contains both “coincidental events” and “those truly caused by vaccines.”

There is a desperate lack of real information on vaccine safety and the frequency of vaccine damage. The mainstream media remains totally complicit in this by dismissing the legitimacy of vaccine damage – and defaming anyone who dares to question vaccine safety.

Together, these institutions prevent the American public from ever knowing the truth about the harm vaccines can cause. They protect vaccine manufacturers at a terrible cost to the people of this country – not just in dollars, but by the sheer volume of people affected by vaccine injury.

Sources:

NaturalBlaze.com

USCFC.USCourts.gov

VAERS.HHS.gov

FEMA US Homeland Security Citizen and Immigration Services

Citizens against vaccination will be among the first groups targeted by FEMA camps in America

Are government agencies conspiring to imprison those who do not conform to their demands? The CDC’s newest proposal surely seems to indicate that the agency has grown a bit too big for their britches, if you will. Their recent Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) declared that the agency would be amending their current domestic and foreign quarantine regulations.

Within these regulations, the CDC has essentially given itself the power to detain individuals by declaring that they are “reasonably believed to be infected” with a communicable disease that is at a “qualifying stage.” In other words, the CDC can now claim you are incubating or carrying a certain disease, and then quarantine you at will. Yes, a government agency has granted itself the power to to do whatever it wants, and whatever it needs to do in order to enforce and obtain strict compliance with their beliefs.

Throughout the massive document that is their NPRM, there are several instances of these “amendments” out and out violating the rights of the American people, and possible routes to target those who do not conform to vaccination standards. It seems as though  the government truly believes that as long as they  present their sheer tyranny under the guise of public good, it will be blindly accepted by the rest of us. For example, this contingency outlined by the CDC is a blatant depiction of their authoritarian aspirations:

“CDC may enter into an agreement with an individual, upon such terms as the CDC considers to be reasonably necessary, indicating that the individual consents to any of the public health measures authorized under this part, including quarantine, isolation, conditional release, medical examination, hospitalization, vaccination, and treatment; provided that the individual’s consent shall not be considered as a prerequisite to any exercise of any authority under this part.” [VB emphasis added]

Now, is it really “entering an agreement” if the individual’s consent is not a “prerequisite” for the agency to conduct any of the above actions?  Those kinds of words suggest that we are not entering any kind of agreement at all; we are entering a police state.

With just those words, the CDC is granting itself the right to detain, isolate, examine, vaccinate and “treat” whoever they want in their FEMA camps, without any kind of consent from free-thinking and otherwise law-abiding citizens.  There are, however, many other  “agreements” and stipulations throughout the document that are equally concerning. Regardless, provisions such as this will pave the way for the CDC to round-up unvaccinated individuals and force them to receive immunizations. After all, according to their propaganda, those of us who abstain from their toxic jabs are the biggest vectors for disease. Rubella, pertussis and other diseases that have vaccines formulated for them are on the CDC’s list for concerning conditions. What do you really think is going to happen when their new “regulations” take effect?

The CDC has set out to grow its power as an agency, and what could be a better way to do that than through tyrannous self-aggrandizement?

Sources:

TheCommonSenseShow.com

FederalRegister.gov

ActivistPost.com

Coca-Cola

CDC executive resigns in disgrace after being caught using influence to favor Coca Cola

When it comes to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), corruption is nothing new.

As with most government organizations, the CDC is fueled by financial greed as opposed to helping support the health and wellness of the American people. They’re much less concerned with whether or not the citizens of the country are flourishing and much more concerned about how much money they have to line their pockets.

The latest corporation the CDC seems to be in cahoots with is none other than soft drink empire Coca-Cola.

New evidence allegedly shows that Barbara Bowman, Ph.D. director of the CDC’s Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, was working with Dr. Alex Malaspina, an employee of the multi-billion-dollar company, to help sway public perception of the effects of soft drink consumption. Once this news was revealed, Bowman resigned from her position with the CDC.

It’s common knowledge at this point that consuming soda isn’t exactly healthy. In fact, there is substantial evidence to support the fact that soda has contributed heavily to America’s overwhelming problems with obesity and the general unhealthiness of its people. According to a report published by Harvard, “Studies in children and adults have found that reducing sugary drink consumption can lead to better weight control among those who are initially overweight.”

Taking care of your body is extremely important in order to make the most out of your life and not die prematurely — and a major part of that is making sure that you eat and drink properly in order to maintain a reasonable weight instead of ballooning up to hundreds and hundreds of pounds. Regularly consuming gallons of sugary liquids is a surefire way to tear down your body beyond repair.

Regardless of what corrupt conclusions the CDC comes to, the facts show that it’s time to completely remove soda from your diet — or face the horrific consequences.

 

Sources:

GovtSlaves.info

NaturalNews.com

HSPH.Harvard.edu