climate change hoax

We here at Natural News have regularly pointed out the hypocrisy and outright deception that encompasses media coverage and political discussion regarding so-called “global warming/climate change.” The issue is as phony as President Obama’s great economy and the recent fake news Washington Post report on “fake news.”

One of the most outrageously false of all the false claims is the one regularly spewed by Left-wing warming alarmists up to and including President Obama is that “97 percent of scientists” believe humans are causing the planet to warm, a figure which forms a genuine “concensus” of “settled science.”

The big problem with that claim is that it is based on incredibly skewed sampling.

As noted by The Last Great Stand website, the 97 percent consensus only makes sense to you if you also believe that nearly 100 million Americans out of about 320 million currently not in the work force really does produce an unemployment rate of just 4.7 percent.

Phony ‘consensus’

Author and frequent on-air political host and commentator Mark Steyn, in a recently published book, A Disgrace to the Profession, documented the fraud surrounding the so-called consensus figure:

Margaret R. K. Zimmerman, MS, conducted an opinion survey of earth scientists on global climate change, the results of which were published by the University of Illinois in 2008. This was a two-question survey, and in fact was conducted online. It was sent to 10,258 earth scientists. Of that figure, only 3,146 responded.

Of the responding scientists, an overwhelming number – 96.2 percent – came from North America. Only 6.2 percent came from Canada, so the United States is dramatically over-sampled even within the North American sample.

Nine percent of U.S. respondents were from California, making California very over-represented within not just the U.S. sample, but elsewhere: That figure is twice as large a share of the sample as Europe, Asia, Australia, the Pacific, Latin America and Africa combined. Of the 10 percent of non-U.S. respondents, Canada comprised 62 percent, Steyn noted.

So the sample was very distorted, but apparently Zimmerman wasn’t satisfied yet, so researchers working with her further distorted it by selecting 79 of their sample and deeming them “experts.” Of those 79 scientists, two were excluded from an added question, lowering the total number of scientists to 77; 75 of the 77 made it through to the final round, and 97.4 percent of them were found to agree with the “consensus” claim.

This is where the “97 percent of scientists” claim comes from. So in essence, a handful of scientists, mostly from Left-wing California, get to decide climate policy for the world’s 6.5 billion people.

In addition to this sham, the “researchers” also invited respondents to comment on the so-called “hockey stick” model, which purports to show a dramatic increase in global warming in a very short period of time (the Industrial Age, basically). That drew three comments: one blandly positive, and the other two – not so much.

Hoaxers have had to alter data in order to fool the masses

As scandalous as this is, however, it’s not the only way climate hoaxers have been manipulating the issue. As Natural News founder/editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, has reported, the data claiming to support the charge that our planet is warming has been repeated faked. He cited the web site Real Science, which noted in June 2014 that NASA began manipulating its climate data after the year 2000.

Prior to that year, the site reported, the space agency’s climate division had been showing the Earth in a perpetual cooling trend (even The New York Times reported on it, in February 1989):

Last week, scientists from the United States Commerce Department’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said that a study of temperature readings for the contiguous 48 states over the last century showed there had been no significant change in average temperature over that period.

Right after 2000, NASA and NOAA changed data to make it appear much colder in the past and much warming in the present.

Sources:

NaturalNews.com

TheLastGreatStand.com

StevenGoddard.com

When the lie becomes big enough — and sufficient amounts of big money are there to support it — a whole lot of folks get big careers from pushing that big lie.

Propaganda trickles down from on high, similar to a scene from the 1956 film version of 1984, George Orwell’s classic dystopian look at a precisely controlled society where poor men, like the beleaguered Winston, must control his suspicions and participate in the recreation of history. Think about pre-programmed Common Core computers in kindergarten classes while observing Winston sending lies down the newspaper shoot, creating a new future while burning the past.

It’s our children and our grandchildren that are being indoctrinated with this big lie, which began to be codified at a Stockholm, Sweden United Nations conference discussing the “human environment” in June, 1972. But, as reported by The Washington Times, if it’s up to Travis Reider, mankind won’t be having as many children, or grandchildren.

Reider says procreating less is an imperative, because we have to “protect them from the ravages of global warming and reduce emissions.” Reider gets big bucks touting these doctrines at John Hopkins University where he is the “assistant director at the Berman Institute of Bioethics.” Reiter is suggesting punitive measures to assure a lower birthrate, like taxes on newborns.

Is this a slippery slope? Ponder a one-child system similar to the methodology once enforced in China. In Reider’s interview on NPR.org, he even proclaimed that “the only thing that could save us” from global warming/climate change is to cut down global fertility by at least 50%. As history repeats its eugenic past, we see these ideas are coming from the same places — big bucks and the ivory tower men and women who play god.

Do you remember the first Earth Day? It took place two years before the U.N. Stockholm meeting. As the years rolled on, we didn’t see much emphasis on cleaning up PCBs, DDT, banning substances like depleted uranium, stopping genetic engineering, forcing Union Carbide to clean up after the Bhopal, India disaster or trawling all that plastic out of the Pacific Ocean. No, it’s all about climate change now. They blame it on that marvelous carbon molecule. Never mind that carbon is fundamental in photosynthesis and life itself. The proponents of climate change, in the guise of carbon control, want to control life — and your reproductive systems are supposed to shut down.

There may not be another younger generation who will understand that their outbound breath is not destroying the earth, and the rhetoric about climate change is really about totalitarian control of all energy and life. History shows us that people who comprehend big lies get mocked and ridiculed, and eventually eliminated for not acquiescing. This carbon climate change debate is one of the biggest lies ever concocted in the last generation, along with saying that genetically engineered food is perfectly safe. Getting your own organic and heirloom seeds and growing your own food is more important than ever — as is doing the research and having the courage to expose these big lies.

John Coleman is a meteorologist, scientist and founder of the Weather Channel. He’s also an octogenarian. This means his generation wasn’t inundated with GMOs or global warming propaganda. When Coleman studied meteorological science at his university, he was taught to critically think. One thing he doesn’t mention in this particular video is the potential link between chemtrails and HAARP to the California drought. But he knocks down the global warming argument with a two-by-four and reveals little known historical seeds that established today’s pervasive scientific dictatorship that is now telling you not to have children.