ArchiveArchive
barack-obama-1000692_960_720

REAL forensic investigation determines Barack Obama’s birth certificate really was a Photoshop fake

President-elect Donald J. Trump was accused of being the primary source of the so-called “birther movement”—the questioning of whether or not President Obama was actually born in the United States and, thus, eligible to be president—when in fact the originator of the movement was Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign.

In any event, the powers that be and, of course, the discredited “mainstream” media, laughed off as a wild conspiracy theory any mention of the fact that Obama’s produced Hawaiian birth certificate was a forgery.

Now, it seems, a lengthy and comprehensive forensic investigation has concluded that, indeed, the copy produced by the Obama administration that is said to be an original is instead a forgery.

As reported by WorldNetDaily, which has long tracked and reported on the issue of Obama’s birth certificate, a just-completed, years-long investigation ordered by Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio—himself and his department a target of Obama’s Justice Department—confirms that those who were subjected to the derogatory “birther” label were right all along, at least regarding the document used to establish Obama’s eligibility to be president.

At issue is the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that presidents be a “natural born citizen,” while not actually defining the term. But as WND noted, scholarly works written by the founding fathers defined it as being a U.S. citizen at birth, born in the United States to two citizens of the country, or merely the offspring of two citizens.

Okay, it was faked…now what?

The birth certificate that Obama displayed on the White House website as “proof positive” he is eligible to be president says he was born in Hawaii to an American mother and Kenyan father. But either way, the Arpaio-ordered investigation has concluded that birth certificate to be “not authentic.”

Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., WND senior staff writer and author of “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” praised the findings.

He said Mike Zullo, head of the Cold Case Posse, and Arpaio “have done the United States a heroic service demonstrating by forensic analysis that the long form birth certificate produced in a White House news conference on April 27, 2011, as Barack Obama’s authentic birth certificate is a forgery.”

So now what?

Corsi says that because the document produced is a fake, as demonstrated by a legitimate law enforcement forensic investigation, that also could mean that Obama’s entire presidency was illegitimate—meaning every action taken (bills signed, executive orders issued, policies made) were also illegitimate, as in null and void.

“Impeachment procedures may be required,” he said, “even if those procedures are conducted after Obama leaves office.”

The real challenge, however, is getting anyone in authority—like Congress or the Trump administration—to examine the findings, verify the study’s conclusions, and then take action.

That shouldn’t be difficult, given that a number of legitimate experts were involved in the multi-year investigation.

Sources:

WND.com

Breitbart.com

AZCentral.com

ballot-return

Mainstream media publishes election results before the election!

Well, that was awkward. Or strangely prophetic. Only time will tell.

In recent days, a Republican candidate for Florida House District 86, Laurel Bennett, was somewhat surprised to discover that a local West Palm Beach NBC affiliate, WPTV, was reporting that she had already lost her race, despite the fact that not a single ballot has been counted yet. Allegedly.

The report from the local affiliate showed Laurel getting 45 percent of the ballot, or 12,189 votes. In response to the report, Laurel took to Facebook to warn her supporters about what was happening:

“Election fraud is already taking place here in Palm Beach County! WPTV is posting election results, today, when the race is Tuesday! Please spread the word and contact everyone you know to vote Bennett on Tuesday! I have a snapshot of it! End corruption in Palm Beach! It begins with you, the voter!”

Needless to say, Palm Beach is notoriously liberal, or at least its newspaper, The Palm Beach Post, is.

Bennett is not the only victim of this kind of scandal. Tinu Pena, a Democrat who got hold of Bennett and told her about the “election results,” said that the station had done the same thing to her when it prematurely announced she had lost a primary to her Democratic rival, Matt Willhite, according to Biz Pac Review.

What in the world?

On its website, the station acknowledged the bogus results and claimed that it had merely been testing its software.

“In order to make sure we bring you fast and accurate election results on election day, we are testing our election page ahead of time with test data,” the disclaimer said. “On election day, this message will be removed and the actual election results will be displayed on this page.”

Sure. Twice.

In an interview with Biz Pac Review, Bennett said that after making the discovery she had to call the station four times before they had a website editor or technician go in and delete the “election results.” She reportedly even asked station management to use fake candidate names if they were going to be posting phony results, but the station said it would not do that.

WPTV’s director of new media, Eric Weiss, told Biz Pac Review that the fake election results on candidates running in state and national elections that are utilized for testing purposes are actually provided to the station by – and are under the control of – The Associated Press. For this reason, he said, the station could not change the data or the names. He also said that tests are conducted for up to one hour per day, three days a week on average, in the weeks leading up to elections, to ensure that the software is operational. It was just coincidental that Bennett’s Google inquiry came during one of the testing periods.

Surely the AP and WPTV wouldn’t be trying to influence an election in favor of a particular party – would they?

Sources:

BizPacReview.com

WPTV.com

BizPacReview.com

ZeroHedge.com