ArchiveArchive
barack-obama-1000692_960_720

REAL forensic investigation determines Barack Obama’s birth certificate really was a Photoshop fake

President-elect Donald J. Trump was accused of being the primary source of the so-called “birther movement”—the questioning of whether or not President Obama was actually born in the United States and, thus, eligible to be president—when in fact the originator of the movement was Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign.

In any event, the powers that be and, of course, the discredited “mainstream” media, laughed off as a wild conspiracy theory any mention of the fact that Obama’s produced Hawaiian birth certificate was a forgery.

Now, it seems, a lengthy and comprehensive forensic investigation has concluded that, indeed, the copy produced by the Obama administration that is said to be an original is instead a forgery.

As reported by WorldNetDaily, which has long tracked and reported on the issue of Obama’s birth certificate, a just-completed, years-long investigation ordered by Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio—himself and his department a target of Obama’s Justice Department—confirms that those who were subjected to the derogatory “birther” label were right all along, at least regarding the document used to establish Obama’s eligibility to be president.

At issue is the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that presidents be a “natural born citizen,” while not actually defining the term. But as WND noted, scholarly works written by the founding fathers defined it as being a U.S. citizen at birth, born in the United States to two citizens of the country, or merely the offspring of two citizens.

Okay, it was faked…now what?

The birth certificate that Obama displayed on the White House website as “proof positive” he is eligible to be president says he was born in Hawaii to an American mother and Kenyan father. But either way, the Arpaio-ordered investigation has concluded that birth certificate to be “not authentic.”

Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., WND senior staff writer and author of “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” praised the findings.

He said Mike Zullo, head of the Cold Case Posse, and Arpaio “have done the United States a heroic service demonstrating by forensic analysis that the long form birth certificate produced in a White House news conference on April 27, 2011, as Barack Obama’s authentic birth certificate is a forgery.”

So now what?

Corsi says that because the document produced is a fake, as demonstrated by a legitimate law enforcement forensic investigation, that also could mean that Obama’s entire presidency was illegitimate—meaning every action taken (bills signed, executive orders issued, policies made) were also illegitimate, as in null and void.

“Impeachment procedures may be required,” he said, “even if those procedures are conducted after Obama leaves office.”

The real challenge, however, is getting anyone in authority—like Congress or the Trump administration—to examine the findings, verify the study’s conclusions, and then take action.

That shouldn’t be difficult, given that a number of legitimate experts were involved in the multi-year investigation.

Sources:

WND.com

Breitbart.com

AZCentral.com

Obama-Eats-America

Investigation finds proof of Obama document forgery with profound implications

It is one of the most, if not the most under-reported, misreported and mis-characterized story in recent history.

An official investigation conducted by law enforcement officials have concluded that the document known as the Certificate of Live Birth of U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama II, uploaded to and published on the White House website on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document. It is a digitally manufactured forgery.

(Article by Douglas J Hagmann, republished from HagmannReport.com)

That is the official and final conclusion of a five-year long investigation performed by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, using the expert analysis of a certified document examiner based in Hawaii and a digital forensics laboratory located in Europe. The findings of this investigation were detailed by lead investigator Mike Zullo under the direction of Sheriff Joe Arpaio in a press conference held on December 15, 2016. Additional details were provided in a subsequent two-hour interview with lead investigator Mike Zullo and Carl Gallups on The Hagmann Report the following day.

Due to the swirl of confusion and often mind-numbing mischaracterizations of the facts of this issue and the nature of the investigation, it is critically important to understand with precision exactly what has been addressed and ultimately determined by this investigation. Only then will the profound and disturbing implications be fully understood, and the magnitude of this issue be realized.

Read more at: HagmannReport.com